When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I am noticing a slight bulge in the sidewall of my left front Michelin AS+ (non runflat). The others do not have this issue. Is this evidence of a belt problem and should I replace the tire now?
I am noticing a slight bulge in the sidewall of my left front Michelin AS+ (non runflat). The others do not have this issue. Is this evidence of a belt problem and should I replace the tire now?
YES !!!
Get it checked. You definitely have an issue that will NOT go away.
1. I should probably replace the tire. I assume I should replace both fronts so the tread wear will be the same.
2. Is there a problem with replacing the fronts with Hankook Ventus EVO rather than Michelins and not replacing the rears? The Hankooks are significantly cheaper than the Michelin and they get good reviews here.
A lot of tires, including new, have a slight bulge in the sidewall if you look at the right angle. More like a small ripple. Have it looked at and ask a tire professional. They may want to sell you a tire, but try to find someone you trust.
I am noticing a slight bulge in the sidewall of my left front Michelin AS+ (non runflat). The others do not have this issue. Is this evidence of a belt problem and should I replace the tire now?
I had the same thing with one of my Michelin Pilot AS's non run flats. The tires had less than 5,000 miles on them, and it was the manager at America's Tire who noticed it while the car was in for a routine balancing. It was so barely noticeable that I don't think I would have caught it. They replaced the tire under warranty immediately.
The tire companies used to call them "undulations" and said they were normal in any radial tire. That is complete BS. Something has happened in the tire that needs to be addressed with a replacement tire before you experience a catastrophic failure of the subject tire.
1. I should probably replace the tire. I assume I should replace both fronts so the tread wear will be the same.
2. Is there a problem with replacing the fronts with Hankook Ventus EVO rather than Michelins and not replacing the rears? The Hankooks are significantly cheaper than the Michelin and they get good reviews here.
I appreciate everyone's feedback on this. Please weigh in on my questions above. Thanks.
I should probably replace the tire. I assume I should replace both fronts so the tread wear will be the same.
It would depend on how worn your tires are, if they more than 1/3 worn I would replace both tires, but it is completely up to you. You should be getting the faulty tire replaced under warranty, so that only leaves the other front tire to buy.
Originally Posted by stevegray04
Is there a problem with replacing the fronts with Hankook Ventus EVO rather than Michelins and not replacing the rears? The Hankooks are significantly cheaper than the Michelin and they get good reviews here.
I have tried the Hankooks, and they are a fine tire. They are a harder ride than the Michelins, and a little noisier, but fine tires. Personally I rate the Michelins so good that I think it is worth paying the extra money for them. I would go for the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3's non run flats.
Originally Posted by stevegray04
Is there a problem with not replacing the rears?
Here again it would depend how worn your current tires are. I'm sure you would have no problem putting new tires on the front and leaving existing tires on the back, or mixing Hankooks front with Michelin rears.
It would depend on how worn your tires are, if they more than 1/3 worn I would replace both tires, but it is completely up to you. You should be getting the faulty tire replaced under warranty, so that only leaves the other front tire to buy..
Since those were the tires that were on the car when I bought it, I doubt that there's a warranty claim.
I like the Michelins too, but they may not be in the budget right now.
obnoxus: I looked at the rim and did not see any bend.
The tire companies used to call them "undulations" and said they were normal in any radial tire. That is complete BS. Something has happened in the tire that needs to be addressed with a replacement tire before you experience a catastrophic failure of the subject tire.
Undulations are not bs. Usually they are concave type. Meaning they look like a trough. Most likely this particular one is a broken sidewall band in the tire which is allowing air to get between the inner liner and outer rubber of the tire. Would need to see a picture of it to tell. To determine if it is a manufacturer warranty the tire needs to be removed and inspect the inner liner for a tear from an impact.
In Post #1 about this problem, I said that the tires are not runflats, but they are. I checked with my local Goodyear store which I've used for the last 30 years and they confirmed that the problem is a belt separating in the sidewall. They also showed me the "zero pressure" on the sidewall. There isn't enough tread to replace only the one tire, so I'm pricing for two. Tire Rack wants $268/tire while Goodyear wants $290, but they will price-match. Goodyear's nationwide road hazard is $58 for two tires while Tire Rack's is $106.
I'll keep my driving local and low-speed until I replace the tires.
In Post #1 about this problem, I said that the tires are not runflats, but they are. I checked with my local Goodyear store which I've used for the last 30 years and they confirmed that the problem is a belt separating in the sidewall. They also showed me the "zero pressure" on the sidewall. There isn't enough tread to replace only the one tire, so I'm pricing for two. Tire Rack wants $268/tire while Goodyear wants $290, but they will price-match. Goodyear's nationwide road hazard is $58 for two tires while Tire Rack's is $106.
I'll keep my driving local and low-speed until I replace the tires.
Check the price for a set of Hankooks, you'll be much happier. You can have a set of 4, for what 2 will run you.