Do you text and drive?



It's a personal rule. I don't even have a 'good' reason for it, never lost a loved one to a DUI or anything, but I do know that driving drunk is incredibly dumb and would never do it.
Comparing a texting driver to a drunk driver is about the stupidest comparison. A drunk driver is drunk all the time they're behind the wheel. As a texting driver, I can make the decision of when I can afford to be a little distracted. 99% of the time that I'm driving, I am not distracted, and in the 1% when I am, I'm still aware of my surroundings.
All of you geezers can get off your high horses now; I know it feels good up there, but you just look like jackasses.
My intended last contribution to this thread is this. I apologize for the lengthy post, but the above (excerpted post) caused me to feel it a worthy addition to this discussion.
As I stated earler in this thread, during my 41 years in the transportation industry (Locomotive Engineer), I was inundated (sometimes overwhelmed) with the science of drunkenness, fatigue, and distracted driving; as it pertains to operating freight Locomotives. This science, ALL applies to planes, trucks, buses, river barges, automobiles, SUV's, boats, etc.
The science is in, it is conclusive, and it is shocking to some (but not to those who have paid attention).
At the scene of a train collision, or serious incident involving a train; the first thing FRA (Federal Railroad Administration) officials demand, is the cell phones, and cell phone records of ALL involved parties, alive or dead!!! And you do NOT have a choice on this, a lawyer cannot help you on this.
Because of all this conclusive science, it is now, a Federal Offense to use a cell phone, or text, on a moving freight train (by Locomotive Engineer, or Conductor in the controlling cab) on America's railroads. No longer just a 'rules violation' of the railroad company. Currently, a violation of Federal regulation, this will cause a Federally Licensed Engineer, to lose his/her federal license, and the ability to operate trains in America. Same for Federally license airline pilots. Soon; (listen carefully now), this will become a violation of Federal LAW (as opposed to just a Federal Regulation). A big difference!!! Very soon, in congress now, they will send US Marshalls out, to take Engineers off of trains, and pilots off of planes; when suspected of violations in this regard; in handcuffs!!!
As laws become stiffer and stiffer against distracted driving violations (cell phones, fatigue, drunkenness), by the states, you should fully expect the Federal Government to follow in time, with 'federalizing' this. They can, and they will. It is being talked about, now, in the halls of Congress. It's only a matter of time, and public disgust with this senseless massacre, which will bring this about. And it will be with full blessing of the states, and public approval.
And for those of you who react thinking or saying 'the federal government can't tell me what to do'.... I assure you, they can, and they will.
You can find many many studies of all this, just using Google Search. I have excerpted from this one, with a link to the entire pdf report. They studied drunk drivers, against drivers distracted by cell phones, against a base line of non distracted drivers.
Please read the 4 or so paragraphs I copied and pasted here below. And please read the entire study, link below, when you have time. (as well as many others, with the same results, all available on line).
You will find, that cell phone distractions actually caused MORE wrecks than drunkenness. And they explain why. And, you will find that 'hands free' blue tooth type use of cell phones, was NO better.
Quotes from study: "Thus, there appears to be a disconnect between participants’ self-perception of driving performance and objective measures of their driving performance. Elsewhere, we have suggested that one consequence of using a cell phone is that it may make drivers insensitive to their own impaired driving behavior (Strayer et al., 2003).
Drivers using a cell phone exhibited a delay in their response to events in the driving scenario and were more likely to be involved in a traffic accident. Drivers in the alcohol condition exhibited a more aggressive driving style, following closer to the vehicle immediately in front of them, necessitating braking with greater force. With respect to traffic safety, the data suggest that the impairments associated with cell phone drivers may be as great as those commonly observed with intoxicated drivers.
On the other hand, we found that cell phones drivers had slower reactions, had longer following distances, took longer to recover speed lost following a braking episode, and were involved in more accidents. In the case of the cell phone driver, the impairments appear to be attributable, in large part, to the diversion of attention from the processing of information necessary for the safe operation of a motor vehicle (Strayer et al., 2003; Strayer & Johnston, 2001).
Also noteworthy was the fact that the driving impairments associated with handheld and handsfree cell phone conversations were not signifi- cantly different. This observation is consistent with earlier reports (e.g., Patten et al., 2004; Redelmeier & Tibshirani, 1997; Strayer & Johnston, 2001) and suggests that legislative initiatives that restrict handheld devices but permit hands-free devices are not likely to eliminate the problems associated with using cell phones while driving.
Finally, the accident data were analyzed using a nonparametric chi-square statistical test. The chi-square analysis indicated that there were significantly more accidents when participants were conversing on a cell phone than in the baseline or alcohol conditions, χ2 (2) = 6.15, p < .05" : End quotes from study.
http://www.distraction.gov/downloads...unk-driver.pdf
Deny the science if you will. The world is full of such fools. Fools blindfolded by their own arrogance, bravado, and lack of education.
Don
Last edited by donald4972; May 3, 2015 at 09:52 PM. Reason: spelling
http://newsok.com/texting-while-driv...rticle/5414784
Last edited by 73Corvette; May 3, 2015 at 08:29 PM.






To answer the question of the OP... NO I do NOT text and drive.
duramansky says that 99% of truck drivers do it... If that percentage were really true (which it's not) then here's me in the 1%. I'm quite sure Porsche, BMW, Mercedes, and Audi are relieved to know that.
I already hate the fact that so many people bury their nose in their phone any free second they have. It's GD pathetic. It's not just texting but, the social media sites that give people a false sense of elevated "social prestige" status as if they are "somebody". A lot of people are addicted to that, God knows why but, they'll risk their life and those around them for the fleeting glory of a few "likes"
These addictions better known as " Nomophobia" are a very real threat in our lives especially driving. As a professional driver, I see people at their worst, everyday for hours. Adding a device that turns people into self-absorbed zombies, just takes it to a whole new level of dangerous. The fines for these infractions are a joke, and until stiffer monetary penalties and insurance rates get jacked people will throw caution to the wind.
Glad to see that there are others like me who actually care about other people's welfare and safety whether you're driving your Vette or not.
As a professional driver, I'm required by law to wear a Bluetooth headset, and I had it before it was mandatory. I urge those of you who spend a great deal of driving to invest in one. It makes a world of difference.
Happy motoring...
To answer the question of the OP... NO I do NOT text and drive.
"
These addictions better known as " Nomophobia" are a very real threat in our lives especially driving. As a professional driver, I see people at their worst, everyday for hours. Adding a device that turns people into self-absorbed zombies, just takes it to a whole new level of dangerous. The fines for these infractions are a joke, and until stiffer monetary penalties and insurance rates get jacked people will throw caution to the wind.
Glad to see that there are others like me who actually care about other people's welfare and safety whether you're driving your Vette or not.
As a professional driver, I'm required by law to wear a Bluetooth headset, and I had it before it was mandatory. I urge those of you who spend a great deal of driving to invest in one. It makes a world of difference.
Happy motoring...

I did not say 99% text. That is a huge federal fine. I said they use hands free phones. That is not against the law. They also talk on their CBs. Those are not hands free. But not in the same percentage. They are out dated except for long haulers. I have not had one for 15 years. But I am a local driver. Same size truck I just don't want to talk to some lonely over the road driver. I would never type a text while driving anything. I would read a short 2 or 3 word text in certain safe conditions. No different than looking at an address on a piece of paper when you are looking for a stop. And we have always done that.
I use a hands-free if I have to talk while driving the Corvette, since it's annoying to tell somebody to hang on every time I shift
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I use a hands-free if I have to talk while driving the Corvette, since it's annoying to tell somebody to hang on every time I shift
I need to cut that out, its usually in stop and go traffic but I also notice myself scrambling through songs I want to hear on the highway.
The Vette just puts you in that mood to find the perfect song when the tops down.
I need to cut that out, its usually in stop and go traffic but I also notice myself scrambling through songs I want to hear on the highway.
The Vette just puts you in that mood to find the perfect song when the tops down.
How did I earn that distinction? By making a quick decision to floor it instead of slam on the brakes when another driver ran a stop sign. He put his foot on the passenger floor as if he were trying to hit the brakes and I hit the gas, and we missed the other car by about 6 inches. If I'd have braked, we'd have been t-boned. We talked about it afterwards and he said he would have made a huge mistake if he'd been driving. There were other examples of my 'good driving,' of course, but this was the catalyst for him.
Age, even experience, does NOT make a good driver. I don't know exactly what does, but some people have it and others do not. I would like to think that those of us who drive Corvettes are generally those who can drive.
How did I earn that distinction? By making a quick decision to floor it instead of slam on the brakes when another driver ran a stop sign. He put his foot on the passenger floor as if he were trying to hit the brakes and I hit the gas, and we missed the other car by about 6 inches. If I'd have braked, we'd have been t-boned. We talked about it afterwards and he said he would have made a huge mistake if he'd been driving. There were other examples of my 'good driving,' of course, but this was the catalyst for him.
Age, even experience, does NOT make a good driver. I don't know exactly what does, but some people have it and others do not. I would like to think that those of us who drive Corvettes are generally those who can drive.






Can't argue your reason for not wanting to talk to some lonely OTR driver, I don't even want to talk them, lol! I like my silence and solitude too much.
Keep on trucking!!
Can't argue your reason for not wanting to talk to some lonely OTR driver, I don't even want to talk them, lol! I like my silence and solitude too much.
Keep on trucking!!

People who can't hold a conversation and safely drive probably can't handle the most basic of random obstacles one might encounter on the road, either

I essentially said EXACTLY the same thing, about 60-70 posts ago, but a couple of people thought I was the problem, not the others....
















