how much power, is too much ?

stock c5z is plenty fast imo.
a race car and a street car have a vastly different setup and making a street car a race car gets expensive when you consider what entry into a formula ford costs and how it in the long run they would actually be cheaper to race
lots of threads about high hp street cars on here. builds, power, been there, done that over ten years ago
now i'm in a virtually stock c5z that's designed for the street with a great street tire that doesn't have to warm up. since i don't have the funds to track often anymore i couldn't be happier and have no interest in more power....except perhaps another 20-30 at 3500+rpm
Last edited by racebum; May 18, 2015 at 10:16 PM.
Fact is, unless you are a professional and know what you are doing, even 450hp is more than enough to get you into plenty of trouble. I am sure lots of people will deny this, but it's the truth.
As to other vehicles having issues. Some do. I believe some of the early build 5.7 MOPAR engines had timing chain issues. Some Coyotes develop a tick, although for some the tick is "normal" and for others it requires a short/long block replacement. (no tick here on my coyote).
By no means have I ever raced professionally, or even driven proffessionaly, but I probably have more experience than most people do with defensive driving courses and how to handle skids, hydroplaning, ice, and such. (My uncle was an instructor at the police academy when I was growing up, and my cousin and I spent a summer going through the entire routine. The driving course was awesome. We spent a lot of time on that.).
You'll hear people who come back from driving courses say that the first rule is, no mods until you can handle what you have in hand, and most will admit that it will be a while before they are at that point. It's the truth.
Although I will admit that the twin blue flames jetting out of the Porsche 918 Spyder's mid-engined exhaust is quite intoxicating at night, there really is no need for 1,000HP combined combuistion and electric motor power unless you are racing professionally.



I hear you, and each must decide what is 'too much'. Street, or track. But most agree, that when it 'goes into boost', there are few feelings greater than that, at least that you can admit to....
But I started this thread, and find all these comments interesting. Hope it continues. I'd like to steer this discussion back a little, to my original intent.
I want to hear, what you all think about the power, ever increasing power, released by GM (Corvette) in new cars. With the histroy of C5 thru C7 (so far), I wondered if we crossed a line somewhere, that is no longer sustainable without a valid warranty to 'fix the things' which simply will not hold up to what the car was advertized for?
Will anyone want to buy a Z06, of any year, without a warranty? The LS7's in C6 Z06 all throw rods and valves unless some aftermarket shop 'fixes' the heads. The new C7 Z06 can't seem to run (on a track) for more than 20 minutes without overheating. And now, it seems more engines arre blowing up. Too soon to be sure if that is a 'pattern' beginning yet, or not.
So, I'm not wanting you to discuss your own car, develloped in the aftermarket, but what the manufactureer is expecting us to buy. Again, I don't want to talk about hand built $250,000 or $350,000 Ferrari's. I"m talking about 75 to $100,000 Corvettes, coming off an assembly line.
Frankly, I feel sorry (uhmmm, kind of) for the guy who 'bought' all the pre-marketing garbage about the new Z, and spent $95,000 for it, and now has to go spend another 10 or 20 grand to Calloway or someone to make the car run hard without overheating.....
I will no longer consider a new Z (I was thinking about it), until they admit there is a problem, and fix it! So, again; is all this a failure of engineering and testing? Is it a failure of GM just 'holding on' to the car another year or two, for more testing, before releasing it? Or, have they gone too far, too much power?
And next, they (rumors) talk of a C8 mid engine supercar? Can they make a car, and an engine package; that will deliver what they promise? Can they make it, still affordable, to middle class guys?
What say you, to all this, to GM? What would you say, or ask GM/Corvette engineers if you had the opportunity?
Don
I hear you, and each must decide what is 'too much'. Street, or track. But most agree, that when it 'goes into boost', there are few feelings greater than that, at least that you can admit to....
But I started this thread, and find all these comments interesting. Hope it continues. I'd like to steer this discussion back a little, to my original intent.
I want to hear, what you all think about the power, ever increasing power, released by GM (Corvette) in new cars. With the histroy of C5 thru C7 (so far), I wondered if we crossed a line somewhere, that is no longer sustainable without a valid warranty to 'fix the things' which simply will not hold up to what the car was advertized for?
Will anyone want to buy a Z06, of any year, without a warranty? The LS7's in C6 Z06 all throw rods and valves unless some aftermarket shop 'fixes' the heads. The new C7 Z06 can't seem to run (on a track) for more than 20 minutes without overheating. And now, it seems more engines arre blowing up. Too soon to be sure if that is a 'pattern' beginning yet, or not.
So, I'm not wanting you to discuss your own car, develloped in the aftermarket, but what the manufactureer is expecting us to buy. Again, I don't want to talk about hand built $250,000 or $350,000 Ferrari's. I"m talking about 75 to $100,000 Corvettes, coming off an assembly line.
Frankly, I feel sorry (uhmmm, kind of) for the guy who 'bought' all the pre-marketing garbage about the new Z, and spent $95,000 for it, and now has to go spend another 10 or 20 grand to Calloway or someone to make the car run hard without overheating.....
I will no longer consider a new Z (I was thinking about it), until they admit there is a problem, and fix it! So, again; is all this a failure of engineering and testing? Is it a failure of GM just 'holding on' to the car another year or two, for more testing, before releasing it? Or, have they gone too far, too much power?
And next, they (rumors) talk of a C8 mid engine supercar? Can they make a car, and an engine package; that will deliver what they promise? Can they make it, still affordable, to middle class guys?
What say you, to all this, to GM? What would you say, or ask GM/Corvette engineers if you had the opportunity?
Don
The line has definitely been crossed when manufacturers start adding line-locks to their cars but then suggest if you use it, it could void your warranty..... Ford crossed that line with the 2015 Mustang and I'm sure at some point it will be challenged and fought in court with the argument being that if Ford added it, Ford should warranty the outcome of using it.
A C8 Mid-engined vette nicely optioned will probably run around 200k (which is right around what the 2005 Ford GT ran, and it had problems with the electrical systems, even so, those cars sell for much more these days) It will be out of the price range for even upper-middle class folk. The new Ford GT is earmarked for a close to 400k price tag. That Carbon Fiber tub is expensive I guess.
I still think GM should spin off the Corvette brand into its own division. Especially if it wants to introduce a mid-engined C8 alongside the traditional front-engined C8's. If that happens. They need to shake off the Chevrolet stigma if they plan on catering to the upper-class folk. Yes, they can make it, but GM needs to start up some serious talks with the Germans. They've been doing it longer and are better at it. The Italian made cars are pretty and all, but they aren't reliable.
One of my favorite car reviewers gave a thumbs up to a nicely optioned C7 and a thumbs down to the C7 Z06. Apparently it was over price. He said the C7 was value for the money, and the Z06 version just wasn't.
Last edited by CriticalmassGT; May 20, 2015 at 03:39 PM.

..that's enough for me..



The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
like i totally mean this in a lighthearted respectful way
you're just not alone. SO many cars wind up with more power than the rest of the car/tire/suspension/brake can really deal with
even more peculiar to myself is how many get made and never raced/driven?
most often the best lap time or even street performance improvements for the $$ can be made with tires, brake pads and dialed suspension set to the drivers preference.
yet
9/10 threads are on HP creation
i noticed this while c5 shopping
brakes = stock
suspension = stock
tires = old and low performance
drivetrain = stock, clutch upgrade if you are lucky
aero = none
HP = 100+ over stock
Last edited by racebum; May 20, 2015 at 06:57 PM.
like i totally mean this in a lighthearted respectful way
you're just not alone. SO many cars wind up with more power than the rest of the car/tire/suspension/brake can really deal with
even more peculiar to myself is how many get made and never raced/driven?
most often the best lap time or even street performance improvements for the $$ can be made with tires, brake pads and dialed suspension set to the drivers preference.
yet
9/10 threads are on HP creation
i noticed this while c5 shopping
brakes = stock
suspension = stock
tires = old and low performance
drivetrain = stock, clutch upgrade if you are lucky
aero = none
HP = 100+ over stock
last I checked we are all grown men and want to carry a "big stick". I am guilty of your statement myself. Im addicted to how the power feels. Honestly, even though I could have made monstrous power going FI, I am happy went stroker instead. 486rwtq is just fun to play with. I don't drive like a jack *** and of course I don't go around stomping on it. Rolling into most of that power is intoxicating and I don't want or need more than that. The only other reason im doing one last modification is to make it look good on paper. I have a blast with it.
85% of the buyers never push the limits of the car, they may get a little spirited here and there but that about it, the 15% that does track, auto x or street race is who they here all the BS about the car so you think they really car about them?
most corvette owners have no idea what there cars are capable of any NEVER will
like i totally mean this in a lighthearted respectful way
you're just not alone. SO many cars wind up with more power than the rest of the car/tire/suspension/brake can really deal with
even more peculiar to myself is how many get made and never raced/driven?
most often the best lap time or even street performance improvements for the $$ can be made with tires, brake pads and dialed suspension set to the drivers preference.
yet
9/10 threads are on HP creation
i noticed this while c5 shopping
brakes = stock
suspension = stock
tires = old and low performance
drivetrain = stock, clutch upgrade if you are lucky
aero = none
HP = 100+ over stock
like i totally mean this in a lighthearted respectful way
you're just not alone. SO many cars wind up with more power than the rest of the car/tire/suspension/brake can really deal with
even more peculiar to myself is how many get made and never raced/driven?
most often the best lap time or even street performance improvements for the $$ can be made with tires, brake pads and dialed suspension set to the drivers preference.
yet
9/10 threads are on HP creation
i noticed this while c5 shopping
brakes = c6z brakes, hawk 1 piece pads, stainless lines
suspension = lg coilovers, hollow sways
tires = ccw's wrapped in nitto invos up front, nt05r's out back
drivetrain = twin disc clutch, pfadt diff mount, dss torque tube couplers, stock trans/diff for now with tr6060 swap sitting in my garage
aero = none, got me there!
HP = 500+ over stock















