When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Here’s an article with pros and cons, and a video with Jay Leno. This is supposed to have a boiling temp at 375°, and last forever. Interesting concept considering the engine will never boil over.
One BIG con is Propylene Glycol doesn't dissipate heat as well as Ethylene Glycol. Sure, it doesn't boil at the higher temps, but all else equal, it will run slightly hotter than regular antifreeze....
Last edited by grinder11; Oct 4, 2022 at 10:39 AM.
It seems that the main deficiency with waterless coolant is that our engines were not designed for it. For example, let’s say it is indeed less efficient at conducting heat (as the manufacturer stated) but is much better at preventing corrosion. That’s better for all aluminum engines, but requires a greater radiator capacity to account for the slower release of heat.
My opinion is that engineers are more concerned about efficiency, compactness, and production cost. I don’t see waterless coolant as being consistent with those goals.