C5 Upgrade
What kind of gain would you like to see and then how are you going to use the car. Finally is there a budget.
There are a number of options and you need to be aware of the good, bad and the cost of each and how it relates to the use of the car.
Are you wanting just engine modes, sound, handling etc?
Not a mech and don't pretend to be. Know just enough to make me dangerous.
Got a pretty good budget. Car has lot of sentimental value to me.
Not a mech and don't pretend to be. Know just enough to make me dangerous.
Got a pretty good budget. Car has lot of sentimental value to me.
Look at the dyno pull -- this is from my car, before and after a super.
the lower one is my car with basic mods headers, catback exhaust, intake and a tune -- I had 330hp and 330 pd-ft. Keep in mind that your car's reported horse power is 350 at the crank, not wheel hp. Figure about 20% ish loss to parasitic drag on from the diff, tube, and tranny, your car bone stock is likely around the 310 range at the wheels (your milage will vary.. back in the day when these cars were new, I remember seeing bone stock dyno pulls around 320hp.. but that would REALLY be the high water mark).
So -- if you really want to get to 400hp at the wheels, you're looking at around 75-100hp gain. And if you don't want to super charge (which will *easily* get you to over 500), you're likely looking at intake, headers, cat back, and a cam. and of course a tune. If you want to maintain streetability, you'll end up getting a somewhat mild cam, so I don't think you'll hit 400-- you'll get maybe (depending on what you install and what your car is putting out now) around 375 ish. But this is a REALLY rough guess.
the good news is though that well thought out upgrades -- the intake, cam, headers, cat back, etc. , will be a very good base if you ever do decide to add a super.. or heads.


Last edited by grinder11; Aug 12, 2023 at 08:13 PM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts


Regardless, I'm surprised you missed the second portion of my quote -- getting to 400hp would be easy, just not with "basic" mods. Here, I'll repost it for you to read this time. Certainly not as difficult as you think it would be:
this is all in the ability of a good mechanic with c5 experience.”
Hmm, So a 20+ yr old motor w a stock A4 can make 400whp reliably without creating any damage and would still work/behave like original?
Anbody done this in 2023 that would add some validity to actual customer costs?
Others will chime in, I'm sure -- 400hp at the wheels is no big deal, and 400 horse power reliably without "creating any damage and would sill work/behave like original" is not only feasible, it's common -- many of us have done just that.
this is all in the ability of a good mechanic with c5 experience.”
Hmm, So a 20+ yr old motor w a stock A4 can make 400whp reliably without creating any damage and would still work/behave like original?
Anbody done this in 2023 that would add some validity to actual customer costs?
Regardless, I'm surprised you missed the second portion of my quote -- getting to 400hp would be easy, just not with "basic" mods. Here, I'll repost it for you to read this time. Certainly not as difficult as you think it would be:
100%. Driveability and reliability are two VERY different things. 550whp cars on stock internals to go to DQ and park your car no problem. However, most have no idea how "reliable" their cars are if they aren't romping on it or taking them to the track. Which puts into question why even modify the car to that hp? So you can tell your DQ loungchair buddies about it? A 1000whp car with otherwise stock components will last forever driving 35 to 70mph. I've had 3 NA builds done with what most consider "mild" cams. 228/228/112 and 232/236/113 neither one "drove like stock" in any way shape or form. Tuned by A&A, 2nd Street Speed, and Cartek. The MN6 needed a 4.10 gear for me to not need to feather the clutch consistently at low speed driving in order to tame driveability. And my tunes were spot on by very reputable tuners in the LS world. My 640whp forged, Novi, H/C build tuned by ECS drives exponentially more "stock like" under 3k rpms. It's also got my Centerforce 680 torque rated clutch on borrowed time. More power requires better supporting mods to be "reliable" if you actually plan to drive your car.
OP...everyone has their own opinion and experience on this topic. Fact of the matter is if you build a three story house on stilts it's bound to topple over with one big storm.
100%. Driveability and reliability are two VERY different things. 550whp cars on stock internals to go to DQ and park your car no problem. However, most have no idea how "reliable" their cars are if they aren't romping on it or taking them to the track. Which puts into question why even modify the car to that hp? So you can tell your DQ loungchair buddies about it? A 1000whp car with otherwise stock components will last forever driving 35 to 70mph.I've had 3 NA builds done with what most consider "mild" cams. 228/228/112 and 232/236/113 neither one "drove like stock" in any way shape or form. Tuned by A&A, 2nd Street Speed, and Cartek. The MN6 needed a 4.10 gear for me to not need to feather the clutch consistently at low speed driving in order to tame driveability. And my tunes were spot on by very reputable tuners in the LS world. My 640whp forged, Novi, H/C build tuned by ECS drives exponentially more "stock like" under 3k rpms. It's also got my Centerforce 680 torque rated clutch on borrowed time. More power requires better supporting mods to be "reliable" if you actually plan to drive your car.
OP...everyone has their own opinion and experience on this topic. Fact of the matter is if you build a three story house on stilts it's bound to topple over with one big storm.
Or are we talking about not doing a the proper procedural teardown you inspect/replace bottom end bearings, rods, rings, and even pistons for spec and damage?
I see a lot of red flags nobody seems bothered about.
Then there’s cost. The average person pays to have their car serviced like Chief.
Does anyone care to elaborate on what his price range would be based on on the “total package “ drivetrain included all in price for a high horse NA build ?
Reread my post... I said most of us that do this, have low mileage cars that we baby and maintain.
BUT-- since you're changing what you said -- sure. 75k-100k miles? 400hp RWHP, with stock driveline? I'll repeat what I already said -- if you maintain your car, absolutely no problem. And there are *many* in here that have done this. With 100k miles, with the stock driveline, with FAR more horsepower than what you're claiming is so difficult to do. Not something that really needs to be proven, I'm surprised you taking such a contrary point.
And like I said -- I'm already at 530hp, my car is 23 years old with 50k miles. Stock transmission. I just maintain it very well. And getting to 500hp wasn't even that expensive, and wasn't even remotely difficult. And it drives like a dream. Others in here have gone the cam/heads/exhaust route and easily surpassed 400hp with NA. It won't behave "exactly" as stock, but once you start making mods you've passed that point anyway.
This really isn't a controversial issue. 400rwph on the stock driveline, as long as it's maintained, not even a minor problem . It's been done many, many times.
Last edited by JMG2; Aug 13, 2023 at 01:41 PM.



















