When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Along that line, what would be considered better gas, for an '01 C-5.....90 octane 0% Ethanol, or 93 octane, 10% ethanol? 93 octane 0% ethanol hasn't been available in my area for several years.
Along that line, what would be considered better gas, for an '01 C-5.....90 octane 0% Ethanol, or 93 octane, 10% ethanol? 93 octane 0% ethanol hasn't been available in my area for several years.
This is also my question. I usually run Shell 93 with 10%, I do have a Citco about the same distance that offers 90 ethanol free which I run all my yard things and generator with. Last time I went to Shell they were out of the good stuff so I filled up with 90 corn free, and honestly I could not feel a difference.
The word "better" is subjective so the answer depends on exactly what you mean when you use the word.
In my opinion fuel that meets GM's requirement of 91 octane rating or more is better than fuel that doesn't.
Originally Posted by cdee63
This is also my question. I usually run Shell 93 with 10%, I do have a Citco about the same distance that offers 90 ethanol free which I run all my yard things and generator with. Last time I went to Shell they were out of the good stuff so I filled up with 90 corn free, and honestly I could not feel a difference.
But when I define "better", I mean what will not damage the car....is using "non ethanol", but only 90 octane fuel better for the car than 93 octane, 10% ethanol is?
All Octane Booster-in-a-can products are a waste of money. If that stuff actually worked, for less money that the usual additive packages do, the oil companies would add it to their existing fuels There are no new chemicals is this world, everything we have today, we've had, and studied for 50 years.
Adding 104octane boost to a tank of gas t, will at best raise the octane of your fuel 0.04 octane (also known as 4 points).
I'm not supporting octane boost companies, but there's far more to the story than you're posting as to why the oil companies don't buy it and use it. First, how do you know that they don't use it in a modified form from the off the shelf stuff we have available??? Second, in its off the shelf form, some brands can destroy converters. I dont use it, but you're making a Helluva blanket statement. One brand I did use years ago was NOS booster, which actually contained a small amount of Nitromethane!!! Used it in my 800cc 3 cylinder Polaris snowmobile. That stuff was some good stuff. But its no longer available, at least AFAIK. I think we can all guess why, lol......
This is also my question. I usually run Shell 93 with 10%, I do have a Citco about the same distance that offers 90 ethanol free which I run all my yard things and generator with. Last time I went to Shell they were out of the good stuff so I filled up with 90 corn free, and honestly I could not feel a difference.
I have run pump 93 octane/10% alcohol for almost the entire 20+ years/140,000 miles I've owned the car. It works fine, and is all you need. Thats what I use in the built LS7 in my C5, no issues.....
But when I define "better", I mean what will not damage the car....is using "non ethanol", but only 90 octane fuel better for the car than 93 octane, 10% ethanol is?
Short answer is no. You would be wasting your money.....
I have run pump 93 octane/10% alcohol for almost the entire 20+ years/140,000 miles I've owned the car. It works fine, and is all you need. Thats what I use in the built LS7 in my C5, no issues.....
In my area, the cost of those two grades of gas is pretty much the same......
I believe it is in my area, too. But you still run the risk of having timing pulled, because the octane isn't there. 10% alcohol harms nothing in port/direct injected engines, or you wouldnt see OEM engines like the LS and Buick 3.8L V6s going 400,000 miles with no fuel issues. My '03 Buick LeSabre went 400,000 with original injectors. Only a deer collision took it off the road. It's more problematic in carbureted engines, especially seasonal use carbureted engines. When you are forcing it thru injectors at 58psi to thousands of psi, there's not many, if any issues. Of course, if you would store the car for several years, with no fuel preservative, it may be better with no alcohol. That I don't know. But if I did store a car for several years, Id drain the fuel out and dump it in my daily....
I believe it is in my area, too. But you still run the risk of having timing pulled, because the octane isn't there. 10% alcohol harms nothing in port/direct injected engines, or you wouldnt see OEM engines like the LS and Buick 3.8L V6s going 400,000 miles with no fuel issues. My '03 Buick LeSabre went 400,000 with original injectors. Only a deer collision took it off the road. It's more problematic in carbureted engines, especially seasonal use carbureted engines. When you are forcing it thru injectors at 58psi to thousands of psi, there's not many, if any issues. Of course, if you would store the car for several years, with no fuel preservative, it may be better with no alcohol. That I don't know. But if I did store a car for several years, Id drain the fuel out and dump it in my daily....
I park my Corvette for the winter, but it's usually only about 4 months, depending on the severity of the snowfall and road salt application. And I do put fuel stabilizer in the tank, before parking it.
UPDATE: I was at Murphy oil in Hudson, Fl. yesterday, and 93 octane, zero alcohol, was $3.98, and the 92 octane, 10% alcohol was $3.48, so in this area, 50 cents difference....
I'm not supporting octane boost companies, but there's far more to the story than you're posting as to why the oil companies don't buy it and use it. First, how do you know that they don't use it in a modified form from the off the shelf stuff we have available??? Second, in its off the shelf form, some brands can destroy converters. I dont use it, but you're making a Helluva blanket statement. One brand I did use years ago was NOS booster, which actually contained a small amount of Nitromethane!!! Used it in my 800cc 3 cylinder Polaris snowmobile. That stuff was some good stuff. But its no longer available, at least AFAIK. I think we can all guess why, lol......
I would say my only blanket statement is that these products don't work for any meaningful positive way.