[Z06] Lowering Effect On Ride Quality
I took the back down on the stock bolts. Definite improvement in looks, but found the ride to be choppy, unending bounce on the rear spring, annoying.
Just did a bit up front. No problem with bounce on the front spring.
Basically removed the rake, car was level. Had a 4 wheel alignment done after it settled.
At the Motorsport Ranch, felt like I was fighting the car around the track, very tiring and didn't feel as fast. Car is now back at stock height.
For all you guys riding around on lowered Z06's, are you just putting up with the "bounce" or did you fix it somehow?
[Modified by TooManyIDs, 10:58 PM 7/29/2003]
I took the back down on the stock bolts. Definite improvement in looks, but found the ride to be choppy, unending bounce on the rear spring, annoying.
If so :eek: :banghead:
I took the back down on the stock bolts. Definite improvement in looks, but found the ride to be choppy, unending bounce on the rear spring, annoying.
:confused: Did I read this right, you only lowered the backend :confused:
If so :eek: :banghead:
as for mine...I lost big time, sometimes I hit pot holes and just brace my self. but the look is really good, and I wouldnt have it any other way.
In the range of normal suspension travel, dynamic response is "linear" and the handling will be predictable. Once you hit a bump stop dynamic response goes non-linear and the car is likely to be a handful. Chevrolet did a lot of work on the rear bump stop design to keep the suspension off the bump stops at high cornering force on a typical road or race course. If you lower the car, you negate a lot of this good engineering.
If you want the car to handle well at the limit on real world roads, don't lower it, or only lower it in very small increments - say a quarter to a half-inch until the handling degrades, then raise it back up to the previous setting.
Duke
In the range of normal suspension travel, dynamic response is "linear" and the handling will be predictable. Once you hit a bump stop dynamic response goes non-linear and the car is likely to be a handful. Chevrolet did a lot of work on the rear bump stop design to keep the suspension off the bump stops at high cornering force on a typical road or race course. If you lower the car, you negate a lot of this good engineering.
If you want the car to handle well at the limit on real world roads, don't lower it, or only lower it in very small increments - say a quarter to a half-inch until the handling degrades, then raise it back up to the previous setting.
Duke
I occasionally subject my car to the high cornering forces you are speaking of, under controlled conditions ;) if you know what I mean. I have always resisted the temptation to lower because I KNOW that the car handles great the way they delivered it. I don't want to find out differently in a 90 MPH sweeping turn after I lowered it. The unlowered look is a hell of a lot better than the "hit the wall at high speed" look.
I agree the car LOOKS better lowered. But the honest people at the track tell me there is very little REAL difference in the handling, if any.
I know a bunch of people will respond " Well the video that comes with the car says to lower it if you are going to track the car " That is true, but the guy that said that is a race development guy that can tell when he went too far and why. I don't know squat about suspension dynamics. I am not going to screw with something that was declared REALLY GOOD by some of the best engineers in the world to "improve" it.
I'm a weekend warrior and an amateur at that. I will never be able to drive the car as fast as it can possibly go, even the way it was delivered from the factory. Andy Pilgram could jump in my unlowered car and probably run 15-30 seconds faster PER LAP! . I take that to mean the one that needs to be modified is me, not the car... :D
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
When the jounce stop is encountered the effective spring rate dramatically increases which increases the roll stiffness on that end. The jounce bumper is specifically designed to gradually increase the rate. If it was solid the rate would effectively become infinite, which would cause the front end to completely washout or snap spin the car it the rear hits a solid stop. The jounce stop is also critical to passing the severe pothole test by attenuating the shock load that is transmitted to the shock mount.
During C5 development (as documented in a SAE paper) the development engineers found that in limit handling the rear suspension was encountering the jounce stop. To compensate they changed the anti-roll bar diameter, but later redesigned the jounce stop to reduce the shock load on the mount from the severe pothole test and it the process they shortened the overall length of the jounce bumper, which allowed more jounce travel before the bumper was engaged, and, as a result, were able to install the original rear anti-roll bar size.
You'd be surprised at how much engineering can go into a simple part like a jounce bumper, but GM did their homework and sweated the details.
Duke
and you don't need better shocks when lowering it that much.
if your handling got strange after lowering, it may be do the alignment getting out of whack. camber and toe will change as you lower. You need to get an alignment after lowering it.
and you don't need better shocks when lowering it that much.
if your handling got strange after lowering, it may be do the alignment getting out of whack. camber and toe will change as you lower. You need to get an alignment after lowering it.
[Modified by TooManyIDs, 11:02 PM 7/29/2003]
Very possible that prolonged high speed turns are bouncing you off the bumpstops.
have you corner weighted your car?
A lot of racers do this and it will lead to a slight increase in ride height as you balance everything out. Maybe that will be what you need.
no negative effect daily driving or autocrossing for me nor any of the (many) z06 autocrossers I know.
and you don't need better shocks when lowering it that much.
if your handling got strange after lowering, it may be do the alignment getting out of whack. camber and toe will change as you lower. You need to get an alignment after lowering it.
Did that (alignment). Street & autocross handling wasn't a problem. It was the bouncy / choppy ride that bothered me in those cases. At the Motorsport Ranch, where turns are taken at 70+ mph, it took more effort to get the car through the course. The lowering was a detriment there.
[Modified by TooManyIDs, 11:02 PM 7/29/2003]
My understanding is that the Z06 damping rates have been changed again for '04 based on development at the Nurburgring, and the new shocks have resulted in measureably better lap times on The Ring and other venues. Buying and installing the '04 Z06 shocks on a prior model year Z06 might be the best suspension upgrade available. I don't think the springs and bars have changes since '01. The only change to the Z06 suspension has been recalibrated rear shocks in '02 and recalibrated front and rear shocks for '04.
Duke
definite performance improvement, car feels more stable on the freeway and handles better overall!
Front definitely looks lower, rear looks abit lower.
conclusion - love it :D
Duke



















