What's wrong with run flats?
They handle like *hit due to the mega stiff sidewall.
They weigh quite a bit more than a regular tire.
To make matters worse the extra weight is all rotating mass.
Con run-flat: Not many tire shops, including Goodyear shops will attempt to repair a run-flat for whatever excuse they give. I did notice that when I changed over from the GY run-flats to the GY F1 GS-D3, that it took two tire techs to wrestle the the run flat off the rim. Some tire shops are afraid they might damage the rim or the tire pressure sensor when dismounting the tire.
Pro run-flat: You can limp to the nearest tire shop with a flat. However, read again the above. What's the use if they won't touch it anyway.
I carry a can of sealer and a set of tire-plugs, tire plug tools, pliers, gloves, a small jack and a tarp when I drive any long distance away from home. The sealer will definitely damage the tire sensor but I'll exchange that with "getting outa Dodge" if needed. The tire-plugs will negate the given tire "speed rating" - damn that means I can't drive 150 mph any more.
The GS D3s non-runflats are definitely quieter and ride smoother than the run-flats. I noticed on a twisty road near home that they did not trigger the traction control as often as the runflats did. On an autocross course I was a lot closer in my coupe to the Hoosier tired Z06s than I ever was with the runflats.
I would seriously consider the next generation Goodyear runflat (the one designed for the C6) if and when they offer it in C5 sizes.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I'm not into racing but I do expect some degree of performance, as well as durability and value in a tire. What exactly do people most dislike about these tires? What would be a better replacement, when the time comes? I'd prefer a run flat but would be open to other suggestions.Thanks.

HANDLING RATING 8.30 8.00 7.60 8.70
DRY TRACTION 8.3 8 8.4 9
WET TRACTION 7.8 6.5 8.2 8.8
SNOW TRACTION N/A N/A 7.1 7.3
RIDE COMFORT 8.2 5.6 8.3 8.3
NOISE COMFORT 7.9 4.5 8.4 8.1
WEAR 6.9 5.2 8.3 8.1
Last edited by JACKAL0PE; Aug 3, 2004 at 07:07 PM.
They handle like *hit due to the mega stiff sidewall.
They weigh quite a bit more than a regular tire.
To make matters worse the extra weight is all rotating mass.

Uh, you must have missed my post.
Each runflat tire weighs 6 lbs more than its non-runflat equivelant....a couple of additional facts:
1. Many tire shops will tell you before they work on your runflats that they cannot guarantee that there will be no wheel damage when they install new runflats. It does take two techs to install one runflat.
2. Goodyear says that the speed rating of its high-performance tires is retained after one plug and one plug only.





It's the same entry-level material sold by Cascade; its just repackaged and in a different width.
You don't want to use it outside where it would be exposed to the elements... which includes door panels.
the vunerable part is indeed the foam, but it doesn't see even air.. let alone the elements. On one side it's adhesived down so there is no element penetration... and the other side sees foil.
Sure; if you take a piece of it (or any type of these products) and subject it to the elements, it may start to break down. But in the car, it's not used in this manor - nor will it ever see the elements.
The manufacturer says it's good up to 180 degrees. The foil/bubble sheet that works so well for heat insulation is also only good to 180 degrees (if there is no air gap).
I don't know where you're getting the info on the FK; but the FAA approved it's useage on private aircraft - aluminum fuselage types - well over 10 years ago:
http://www2.roversnorth.com/roversno...ser/26508.html
Last edited by Mike Mercury; Aug 4, 2004 at 01:19 PM.
Once I had a slow leak on the tire and it was nearly flat.
Who needs the "runcraps" .....The YOKOS sidewalls held up pretty good, and I made it to the tire shop just fine.
"RUNCRAPS"=
"YOKOS" =














