When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
2000 Auto should not have fuel cutoff in column lock condition
Originally Posted by JC in XTC5
Q: Should my car (an automatic) be shutting off fuel with the column lock, even with the wheel now unable to be locked?
A: Yes. This is the original design.
Actually, the first page of this thread has this:
Originally Posted by Cscokd
Q What can happen then if my CLB gets out of sync?
A Your DIC will display "Service Steering Column Lock" error message; your steering wheel will not be locked; if you own a 1997-2000 C5 that has not had the recall implemented; you should be able to drive your car normally. You must reset your DIC each time you start your car if you are annoyed with the error message. IF you have a newer C5 (2001-2004) OR you've had the recall implemented, you will NOT be able to drive your car because the fuel will be shut off at speeds above 2 mph.
and this is the portion that was done to my car in error by the dealership (I say in error because my car is an Automatic)
Originally Posted by Cscokd
Q I have a MN6/M12 car, what will the recall do?
A IF you have a MN6/M12 car, the recall does NOT disable your column lock motor. It simply re-programs your PCM to guarantee your fuel is shut off at speeds above 2 mph so you cannot drive your car with the steering column locked.
So, I'm believing that my 2000 Auto which had the PCM reprogrammed (in error by the GM technician) should not have the fuel cut off if I can get the dealership to undo the PCM programming they did in error. Does anyone agree with my thinking here, or is the Cscokd posting on the first page of this thread inaccurate?
Actually, the first page of this thread has this:
So, I'm believing that my 2000 Auto which had the PCM reprogrammed (in error by the GM technician) should not have the fuel cut off if I can get the dealership to undo the PCM programming they did in error. Does anyone agree with my thinking here, or is the Cscokd posting on the first page of this thread inaccurate?
Regards.
No you are incorrect. The post you're referring to regarding the PCM programming is incomplete and misleading. The PCM programming part of that recall was to "modify" the logic used that shut fuel off if the BCM detected a locked or out-of-sync state under a certain low voltage condition.
The BCM has always an continues to receive lock state signals (from the CL lock feedback switch, the Harness K, or CLB) and if it is not happy with the state it sees it will disable fuel - PERIOD.
If you don't believe me, access the Corvette Service Manual section on this - it clearly outlines the original design of the BCM/PCM interaction.
No you are incorrect. The post you're referring to regarding the PCM programming is incomplete and misleading. The PCM programming part of that recall was to "modify" the logic used that shut fuel off if the BCM detected a locked or out-of-sync state under a certain low voltage condition.
You are correct in that the PCM programming modified existing code to handle low voltage corner case conditions. I think we've all learned a lot in the past 19 months since my original post. My opinion is that the original logic never really worked and they actually made a bug fix in addition to fixing the corner cases you mention.
Originally Posted by JC in XTC5
The BCM has always and continues to receive lock state signals (from the CL lock feedback switch, the Harness K, or CLB) and if it is not happy with the state it sees it will disable fuel - PERIOD.
I agree with everything you said except the "PERIOD". I am wondering how some of us drove our cars with the ECL totally disconnected constantly displaying service column lock errors. I personally drove mine for over a month like this. My fuel never once shut off. But it could be that the PCM program changes after Y2000 made this difference.
Originally Posted by JC in XTC5
If you don't believe me, access the Corvette Service Manual section on this - it clearly outlines the original design of the BCM/PCM interaction.
I'm sure you are correct and the Service Manual does say this. I'm just not sure I believe everything GM says. Otherwise we wouldn't be still dealing with this problem after all these years would we? Thanks for your posts. They are always helpful and precise. I think it's probably time to review and update my original post now after 19 months. If you have time and are so inclined I would appreciate your comments so that inaccuracies can be discussed and corrected. I'm also looking for the original pics of the ECL. The links disappeared. If anyone has them, please PM me.
Thanks
John
I have my vehicle in at a GM Dealer - good vette dealer - doing some work for me.
Question is I had the first Recall done 04006B on the column lock two years ago and have not had one problem since then.
Since their is a updated recall - 04006C - would you have them conduct that one as well/ with my luck I will start having problems.
I guess they remove the plate on this one.
I have my vehicle in at a GM Dealer - good vette dealer - doing some work for me.
Question is I had the first Recall done 04006B on the column lock two years ago and have not had one problem since then.
Since their is a updated recall - 04006C - would you have them conduct that one as well/ with my luck I will start having problems.
I guess they remove the plate on this one.
Advice Please
I'd go ahead and have them remove the lock plate and then I'd put in a CLB when they're done.
John
I had the column lock last week and was flatbedded to the local dealer. None of the tricks found here would free it up. I made sure to tell him about the new recall (4006C) and he said he would research it.
When I picked up the car I had a $450 bill and the recall wasn't done. He claimed that I had a short in the column lock wire that had to be fixed. He also replaced relay part #12193601. He did research the recall and said mine didn't need it because 4006B had been done. I argued and he said he couldn't do a recall unless the vin showed it needed it in the GM computer system.
I went as high as they would let me through the GM phone numbers and they are holding firm to the car not needing 4006C if the previous one has been done.
I'm afraid those of us with manual transmissions may have problems getting this done.
I just got mine done 2 weeks ago and had no problem. However, my DIC and gauges quit working the next day.. Dealership claims that it wasn't due to the recall but i think that a bunch of
I had the column lock last week and was flatbedded to the local dealer. None of the tricks found here would free it up. I made sure to tell him about the new recall (4006C) and he said he would research it.
When I picked up the car I had a $450 bill and the recall wasn't done. He claimed that I had a short in the column lock wire that had to be fixed. He also replaced relay part #12193601. He did research the recall and said mine didn't need it because 4006B had been done. I argued and he said he couldn't do a recall unless the vin showed it needed it in the GM computer system.
I went as high as they would let me through the GM phone numbers and they are holding firm to the car not needing 4006C if the previous one has been done.
I'm afraid those of us with manual transmissions may have problems getting this done.
You need to go back to the dealer and DEMAND that THEY contact their technical support center to get the correct info. You should also call Chevy Customer Service. There is absolutely no reason for the dealer to ignore performing this recall other than pure laziness.
I see you have a '99 MN6. Recall 4006C is the first recall to disable the column lock on MN6s. The recall notice lists the VIN breakpoints: X5100001 through X5133283 for the 99s - I assume your's is within this range.
For the record, I have never had GM touch my CL because I installed the CLB when I first bought my car. You should still look at getting the CLB installed either way you go.
GM doesnt have to do the 4006C recall UNLESS you have a message in the DIC or have to have your car towed in with a locked column. My car hadthe 4006 recall done in 2004 and I just talked to a 3rd dealer this morning about my car and they WILL NOT DO THE 4006C ON IT PERIOD. End of story they said.
You need to go back to the dealer and DEMAND that THEY contact their technical support center to get the correct info. You should also call Chevy Customer Service. There is absolutely no reason for the dealer to ignore performing this recall other than pure laziness.
I see you have a '99 MN6. Recall 4006C is the first recall to disable the column lock on MN6s. The recall notice lists the VIN breakpoints: X5100001 through X5133283 for the 99s - I assume your's is within this range.
For the record, I have never had GM touch my CL because I installed the CLB when I first bought my car. You should still look at getting the CLB installed either way you go.
The people I talked to were the ones at Customer Service. I used the 800 number listed in the recall. I went up through the ladder of people there and they're the ones that say if a prior 4006 has been done the dealer can't do the 4006C.
GM doesnt have to do the 4006C recall UNLESS you have a message in the DIC or have to have your car towed in with a locked column. My car hadthe 4006 recall done in 2004 and I just talked to a 3rd dealer this morning about my car and they WILL NOT DO THE 4006C ON IT PERIOD. End of story they said.
My car WAS towed in with a locked column but they claim it had nothing to do with the recall as there was a short in a wire. I guess it has to actually be one of the two conditions listed in the recall. (The fuel shutoff or the pin not fully retracting.)
If other dealers are doing the recall a second time how are they getting it through GM?
time for action car at dealer towed in service column lock and fuel shut off all recall work done $569.00 to replace actuater which whether they GM WANT or not is part of the column lock circuit attorney involed in the morning i want my money back!!!!
Last edited by no.21 dad; Sep 21, 2006 at 07:54 PM.
Reason: misspell
Really quick, i bought the CLB from COH and had the 4006C recall done, which is the removal of the locking ring. Now can i just install the CLB or do I have to remove anything before hand? Thanks in advance.
Looks like tomorrow is going to be the third time on a flat bed! Have had every version of recall done on my '02 MN6 including taking the locking ring off. Just got the Service Column Lock message again and shut down. Tried pulling the #23 fuse to reset the BCM and it backed it up to the pull key and wait 10 seconds message and then it gave me the Service Column Lock message again. Unreal. Can't wait for the run around at the dealer again. Sure they will try and bill me for something on it!
Had already decided it was time to sell the vette. This just confirms it. They are awesome cars, but I have to drive mine everyday and can't deal with having to take it to the dealer every 3 months for the same B.S. problem.
Looks like tomorrow is going to be the third time on a flat bed! Have had every version of recall done on my '02 MN6 including taking the locking ring off. Just got the Service Column Lock message again and shut down. Tried pulling the #23 fuse to reset the BCM and it backed it up to the pull key and wait 10 seconds message and then it gave me the Service Column Lock message again. Unreal. Can't wait for the run around at the dealer again. Sure they will try and bill me for something on it!
Had already decided it was time to sell the vette. This just confirms it. They are awesome cars, but I have to drive mine everyday and can't deal with having to take it to the dealer every 3 months for the same B.S. problem.
The only way to get your car back to normal is for the GM monkeys to reprogram or replace the BCM, replace the steering lock actuator with the good one and throw away the faulty column relay. Then, you'll have to install a CLB on your own. Thalt's what youll need to do to be able to sell it, so do it for yourself.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.