Long Tube headers
I am also in the market for LT's. The ones I have seen discussed on this site and you most likely can't go wrong with are the LG's, Kooks and Dynatech. Asking forum members on which one is better is a tough one. I would say they are all very comparable and would probably suggest getting them jet hot coated. I have a 1970 Chevelle SS with Hooker Super comp headers that were jet coated and they reduce under hood heat in a significant way.
Best of luck in your choice, price will probably win out in the decision making process.
Tino


Of course, the kooks' site has more pictures of Shmustangs, whereas LG has nothin by Vettes. So for the "I HATE FORD'S" crowd, the LGs win out.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts






Tino

I am running the QTP's that are a Tri-Y design. They install very easy, the O2 sensors go back in as they do in the stock system, no hassles at all with cable lengths, etc. The headers mate to the Random Tech system that is made for these headers including high flow metal matrix cats. Nice close up fitment to the bottom of the car. All stainless steel. You don't see the same publicity with the QTP's as some of the other more "touted" brands, but the numbers and the torque curves speak for themselves. Careful of huge claims as many games can be played with the dyno numbers. Here is an interesting header article if you are interested:
Header Article
I am running the QTP's that are a Tri-Y design. They install very easy, the O2 sensors go back in as they do in the stock system, no hassles at all with cable lengths, etc. The headers mate to the Random Tech system that is made for these headers including high flow metal matrix cats. Nice close up fitment to the bottom of the car. All stainless steel. You don't see the same publicity with the QTP's as some of the other more "touted" brands, but the numbers and the torque curves speak for themselves. Careful of huge claims as many games can be played with the dyno numbers. Here is an interesting header article if you are interested:
Header Article
Tino
I am running the QTP's that are a Tri-Y design. They install very easy, the O2 sensors go back in as they do in the stock system, no hassles at all with cable lengths, etc. The headers mate to the Random Tech system that is made for these headers including high flow metal matrix cats. Nice close up fitment to the bottom of the car. All stainless steel. You don't see the same publicity with the QTP's as some of the other more "touted" brands, but the numbers and the torque curves speak for themselves. Careful of huge claims as many games can be played with the dyno numbers. Here is an interesting header article if you are interested:
Header Article
especially if you're looking for some headers that fit up tight to the bottom of the car. Vettenuts looked for a long time and studied the issue forever. I've studied a lot, too. Did a spreadsheet comparing, from what I could tell, two similar cars and their dyno sheets for the LG and QTP headers. They mirrored each other throughout the power curves and differences swapped back and forth throughout the RPMs. Based on inaccuracies and differences between dynos, you could say they were exactly the same. (Note: tire inflation affects dyno readings....remember pedaling your bike on half inflated tires as a kid? Imagine rear tires inflated to 45 psi for a dyno run.)
Now, if going all-out with a head/cam package and bumping the redline up to 6600+ RPM, you'll clearly see an advantage from the LG's (Kooks, for that matter) due to the nature of 4 into 1 headers versus Tri-y designs.
Oh, and actually, "long tube" isn't the most important aspect.....equal tube length is the most important thing and why the Kooks and LGs can squeeze more HP and TQ out of long-length primary tube headers. Their headers are near equal length. Other things, like merge collectors, squeeze out a few more horses, too, but at higher cost. If your racing for money, worth every cent. For me, the extra money would go better towards other speed items.
Upshot - if price doesn't matter and you have to have every single ounce of power "under the curve," then go with LG's. Value buyers would be better with QTPs, or if really cost conscious and another 5 HP (approx.) doesn't mean as much, go Dynatech.
If clearance is the biggest issue, then it's a no brainer - QTP. Oh, and I believe you'll get an easier install with the QTP.
I've no personal experience with any listed. These opinions are only based on what others have reported and what I've learned about exhaust systems, so holster the flame throwers.
Hope I've helped.
Tino

I don't personally want to sway you in any direction, I am merely suggesting you do your homework and don't go solely by popularity. Determine how you will use the car and what you want in the future. I don't take my car to the track so peak numbers were not as important to me. I wanted something easy to install that were soundly designed and would provide me a little more grin factor in everyday driving. I am very happy with my choice, and others are with theirs as well. You have to determine what you want from your car and what your budget is. Good luck.
Last edited by vettenuts; Apr 25, 2005 at 12:07 PM.
....I've no personal experience with any listed. These opinions are only based on what others have reported and what I've learned about exhaust systems, so holster the flame throwers.
Hope I've helped.


















