When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
From: All humans are vermin in the eyes of Guru VA
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Cruise-In V Veteran
OK dumb LS1 cam question
I have an F-body and I am looking to upgrade my camshaft as part of my efforts to make it the car I want it too be. Other things that are planned are a cat-back, and an intake. I am really not in the mood for ported heads, or any of that silliness. I already have 1 motor disassembled in my townhouse from my C3. A cam swap is about the most intensive mod I want to make. Its an Auto, and its been tuned by violator.
I am looking for
around the same RPM range as stock, but with a much more aggressive sounding idle, so I think that I am going to have to drop the LSA to around 112 or so.
It also has to pass emissions here in VA so that is also a concern and why I am not going to go with long tubes all that jazz. Its a driver that I just want to idle more aggressively and have more power.
On that note, if I cant do that I would like to maintain the RPM range and just go faster.
With such an increase in duration your power band will move up a lot. With my 224 I have a fairly flat HP peak that runs from 6200-6500 RPM.
Comp makes a small cam (206/212) and they advertise the powerband to be 800-5800. Also, it has a 112 LSA. You will need springs, but with a cam like this yellow LS6 springs would be fine (max lift for this cam is .522)
220 is the min I would go if going through the trouble.
I disagree. He said he is going with stock heads and no headers. Without headers the smaller cam should be less 'peaky' giving him more all around power. With a cam like the Stealth a torque converter swap would even be creeping up on him.
Guru_4_hire, the Lunatic cam you mention has 116 LSA, I thought you wanted a 112? A 116 will idle really smooth.
It is feasible. A lot of the performance cams have lower LSA's but if you find some cam specs you like but want them on a lower LSA have it custom ground. Generally, there is no difference in price as the cam you buy is likely not an off the shelf item anyway. When I ordered my cam from a supporting tuner the cam actually came direct from Comp.
Couple of points here. First, on the Lunati cam that was mentioned, the LSA is 112, and the intake centerline in 116. This means that the cam is advanced 4 degrees, which is very standard on most aftermarket cams.
Second, although it's true that a cam with more duration will move the power band up somewhat, it's almost invisible on a dyno graph, which typically starts at 2K to 2500 RPMs. I have seen dozens of dyno graphs comparing cams of varying durations. In almost every case, the cam with more duration shows power gains throughout the RPM range. Usually the peak TQ occurs at approximately the the same RPM, regardless of duration. With the larger duration cam, the power loss occurs below 2K RPMs. You can feel it on the road, but you don't see it on the dyno graph.
I previously had a 218/224 114 LSA cam in an LS1, w/ shorty Edelbrock headers and OEM cats. It was almost impossible to detect the cam at idle, and it passed VA emissions with ease. It made over 380 TQ/HP, and still got over 20 MPG.
In my opinion, 212 duration is ultra conservative, and will only result in a 20 HP gain, maybe even less.