When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Rotating mass is the enemy....robs horsepower and will slow the acceleration of the engine (and make it slightly less responsive).
Not a good set-up if your looking to be a hero on the chassis dyno (or the track)...thats for sure.
A heavy flywheel/pressure plate combo will slow you down on the track only if your launch rpm is lower than your rpm through the traps. Additional mass could even be an advantage with tall gears, poor low-end torque, or excellent traction.
Originally Posted by Tony Mamo
The other negative is that heavy mass single disc clutch will make lightening fast shifts at high RPM much more difficult (which I personally kind of enjoy the challenge of).
Pressure plate and flywheel mass don't factor into the speed of the shift. The synchros only need to overcome the clutch disc mass.
Here's my 2 cent. I just got my car back with the LS7 set up installed. Ive only got about 140 miles on it so I have not really jumped on it. I doubt my car will see a road race or a track run, and I still think the selection was right for me.
The clutch does grabs a little lower then my stock LS1. I have the adjustable master in, but have not corrected the engaugement level yet. It not a bad engaugement level, it's just a little lower than im used to.
I have gotten on the car at 3/4 throttle once or twice, and it grabs hard. A friend of mine had about 460 HP with 3.90s and it grabs perfect. Its a great clutch for the street car with HP.
A friend of mine had about 460 HP with 3.90s and it grabs perfect. Its a great clutch for the street car with HP.
Phil drove my car with 460RWHP and the LS7 setup. I agree with Tony Mamo, for people wanting a stock feeling clutch that works with extra HP the LS7 is a great choice. I have't found a downside on mine yet after about 5k miles and I do "drive it like I stole it"
A heavy flywheel/pressure plate combo will slow you down on the track only if your launch rpm is lower than your rpm through the traps. Additional mass could even be an advantage with tall gears, poor low-end torque, or excellent traction.
Some tracks actually have turns.
Pressure plate and flywheel mass don't factor into the speed of the shift. The synchros only need to overcome the clutch disc mass.
Not exactly true. An engine with a heavier mass flywheel/pp assembly changes rpm more slowly than if a lighter assembly is used. Therefore the syncros have to overcome a larger speed differential between gears. A lighter assembly also makes rev matching when downshifting easier.
From: Wylie TX --> Less is More, except under the hood !
I have a good question for you....
Do you feel that you Lost or Gained any power "Feel" to the wheels with this clutch setup ?
I don't want to install this clutch and find the car "feels" slower because people have said its a heavier clutch set up than the LS6 clutch. I did not listen to guys here about heavier wheel weights affecting my car's performance and I sold the heavy wheels 2 weeks after I got them.
My 04 Z06 has 525HP/500Tq (LG's Heads/Cam/Headers). I can feel the clutch engagement is becomming more and more towards the highest point in the movement. Its time I start thinking about a clutch replacement.
A lighter assembly also makes rev matching when downshifting easier.
Originally Posted by VetteDrmr
An engine with a heavier mass flywheel/pp assembly changes rpm more slowly than if a lighter assembly is used. Therefore the syncros have to overcome a larger speed differential between gears.
Mike
Sorry, can't go along on that one. Speed differential between the gears is a function of transmission ratios, not engine rotating mass.
When shifting (at least if you use the clutch when shifting) the transmission and clutch disc are disconnected from the engine, so engine mass isn't a factor. Only clutch disc inertia.
Last edited by Warp Factor; Jul 11, 2006 at 03:32 PM.