SAE vs. STD on the dyno





Thanks,
Clayton from Las Vegas





Thanks,
Clayton from Las Vegas
STD the older J607 standard considers that the engine was run on a 60°F day with 0% humidity and a barometric pressure of 29.92 in-Hg or......
SAE the newer J1349 standard of 77°F (25°C) day with 0% humidity and a barometric pressure of 29.234 in-Hg (99 KPa).
Standard (J607) will report higher numbers than SAE (J1349 ).
You want a real argument - then we could discuss DYNOJET numbers vs the real world -and the fact that DynoJets are ridiculously high !
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Actually, my plan is to get a bigger cam to compensate for the altitude and weather. Thanks for the advice, Steve, I really appreciate it!!
Last edited by Billdog350; Dec 26, 2006 at 08:48 AM.
1. Type of Dyno or Manufacturer ( Different types give different numbers)
2. Automatic or manual transmission
3. Calibration used (SAE,STD, Correction factor)..
Without this info.. Dyno Numbers are like comparing oranges to apples or meaningless all together
1. Type of Dyno or Manufacturer ( Different types give different numbers)
2. Automatic or manual transmission
3. Calibration used (SAE,STD, Correction factor)..
Without this info.. Dyno Numbers are like comparing oranges to apples or meaningless all together
Various dyno testing and chatter from some of my contact at GMPT has placed C5 manual driveline loss in the range of 13-17% with the average at about 15%.
The problem with this number is it varies quite a bit on a per-car basis because so many different things affect it.
Some issues affecting it are:
Temperature of tires, axle and trans
Ring and pinion condition and set-up
Transmission condition
Tires
Any slip of the tires on the rollers.
type of transmission and axle lubricants
Example:
02 C5 MN6 LS1 stock rated at 350FWHP
same car on Dynojet 301RWHP
15% lose added in = 346FLHP
Pretty close and a little low compared to the factory.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Type of Dyno or Manufacturer ( Different types give different numbers)
2. Automatic or manual transmission
3. Calibration used (SAE,STD, Correction factor)..
Without this info.. Dyno Numbers are like comparing oranges to apples or meaningless all together
Ed
At a dyno shop in the area I used to live, my buddies car dynod around 410 (dyno jet) with a heads/cam (and other stuff) and a 150 shot. Car ran an 11.1 with a "fair" 60'. Had he hooked up, he w/h been 10s for sure!
Aint gonna happen with 410 hp, 3.42 gears and a small stall.. Gotta add this is NOT a car setup to be a drag car!! Just a fun daily driver..
I am sure if this Engine/Race car/Dyno shop had built the motor, the numbers would have been much higher.
I strongly feel thats why some guys here post numbers that seem so impressive and unrealalistic!
Welcome to the real world.
JMHO
Last edited by Fastbasser; Dec 26, 2006 at 10:46 AM.
At a dyno shop in the area I used to live, my buddies car dynod around 410 (dyno jet) with a heads/cam (and other stuff) and a 150 shot. Car ran an 11.1 with a "fair" 60'. Had he hooked up, he w/h been 10s for sure!
Aint gonna happen with 410 hp, 3.42 gears and a small stall.. Gotta add this is NOT a car setup to be a drag car!! Just a fun daily driver..
I am sure if this Engine/Race car/Dyno shop had built the motor, the numbers would have been much higher.
I strongly feel thats why some guys here post numbers that seem so impressive and unrealalistic!
Welcome to the real world.
JMHO
There is no way a H&C LS1 with a 150 shot is going to dyno only 410.
In order to get accurate data you need a dyno with load absorption control and measurements that are taken from a torque arm, not calculated from an inertia roller.
414 rwhp, Dynojet, SAE
Because that number can be compared to other Dynojet readings as long as its also SAE corrected.










