When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Are you saying the "revised" version uses standard pushrods lengths? There was a rumor circulating they were modifying them because the stock rockers didn't work and I think they were losing sales because people had to add in rocker arms to the cost of the heads and this effectively made them the most expensive head out there except possibly for the ETP's that required alternator bracket modifications. Longer pushrods can also lead to valve train instability with ETP being the prime example since their pushrods are over 8" long. With the benchmark being the AFR's that bolt right on and have a CARB number, I would understand if they revised them it would be to better compete in the market.
Last edited by vettenuts; Jul 25, 2007 at 06:44 AM.
I have the revised heads. I'm not sure what was done. Just guessing, they probably changed the rocker positioning to accomodate different rocker/pushrod combos. They do still require roller rockers though.
I didn't hear anything about using stock rockers. I posted a lengthy thread on LS1Tech about why these heads made no power over my previous ported 241 castings. The valvetrain geometry was where the experts seemed to think the problem was. In that thread everyone still cautioned against the stock rockers on these revised heads. In the end switching rockers did vastly improve the driving characteristics of the car, though I haven't dyno'd it to see where the power is at now.
7.5" is the correct pushrod length for heads milled to 61cc (which is common). On non milled heads you will need to measure or ask someone like TEA for the correct length.