When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
From: Are you fat because you're lazy or lazy because you're fat? San Jose, CA
Cruise-In X Veteran
St. Jude Donor '09
I'm not sure about your specific question, but I've been told to stay with the 1.7 ratio from Tony Mamo, and he certainly knows what he's talking about.
And it's duration that affects the P2V clearance much more than lift does.
A higher rocker ratio will slightly reduce your P to V clearance.
The other negative is valve control which they will inevidably have an adverse effect on (valve motion is no longer accurate and smooth at higher RPM's due to the added intensity from the higher ratio).
You have to have dedicated cam profiles meant for the faster ratio's to really benefit from their installation.
There are better places to spend your money...you may end up with the same or even less power due mainly to valve control issues.
Good luck
Tony
PS...Duration has a much greater effect on power output than lift by the way. You are far better off getting a different cam but obviously the swap is not nearly as simple.
PSS....If you get 1.85 rockers and lose power the executive producer might cancel your Corvette show....LOL (badda bing!)
Last edited by Tony Mamo @ AFR; Aug 1, 2007 at 05:43 PM.
Not sure what you are trying to achieve or why you are looking at rockers, but have you considered a good 1.7 rocker? Someone on tech picked up 5 hp with the Yella Terra's in a back to back dyno and I think the Crane's have something to offer as well, but for more $$$. The Cranes are also fully adjustable if that is of interest to you. One thing I do like about the aftermarket rockers is, from my experience, you can achieve a much more narrow wipe pattern with them if you correctly adjust them and this should help with valve guide wear, especially when using stiffer aftermarket valve springs.