C5 Tech Corvette Tech/Performance: LS1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Mods That Work !

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 10:16 AM
  #1  
Nightshifter's Avatar
Nightshifter
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota Florida
Default Mods That Work !

Okay, time to combine some efforts here in attempt to seperate the MOD's that work (increase HP and lower your 1/4 times) and the MOD's that don't! I've exhaustingly searched throughout the forums for MOD's to help my 2000 C5 A4, but there are so many contradicting opinions ! Surely, the cars are pretty much the same, but the driver's and driving conditions differ. Example: "It's not worth it to put an intake on a stock motor because the engine is tuned by GM to only suck in so much air..." In order for one to benefit from any MOD, or a series of MOD's, the car must be retuned !

It seems the only MOD i found that does work is Dr. Gases or Bassani's X-Pipe!

http://www.drgas.com/store/product.p...2&cat=1&page=1

Basically my car can pull 13.20's best, what i'm trying to do is get into the 12's all day long without a dynotune (but i'll eventually get one) and without gears and drag radials. So, what mods do work in conjunction with each other to gain about 4 ~ 5 tenths off in quarter, if any ?
Please back up your claims with times and or dynos, not by SOTP feel !

Last edited by Nightshifter; Nov 16, 2007 at 11:07 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 10:23 AM
  #2  
Nightshifter's Avatar
Nightshifter
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota Florida
Default

Example ! : Breathless Performance claims up to 40 HP on there LS1 Engine Performance Package #1. Up to ? Why is that ? I would like to know the minimum that can be expected. Is this a bolt-on and you got the HP, or do you need a dynotune (for 500 or 600 bux) in conjunction with the package to get the HP! Basically it's all a complete intake upgrade...

Stage 1- Up To 400HP

Vortex Ram Air Induction Box

Vortex Power Duct with silicone couple

(97-00 includes Upgraded MAF Housing and MAT sensor)

Item 300-050 (97-00) $670.00

http://www.breathlessperformance.com...0-050stage.asp


now this would be great, if, it works ! I would buy, install and be done with it, and my car would be around 4/10ths faster !
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 10:28 AM
  #3  
uracowman's Avatar
uracowman
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,113
Likes: 0
From: Houston TX
Default

Originally Posted by Nightshifter
Example ! : Breathless Performance claims up to 40 HP on there LS1 Engine Performance Package #1. Up to ? Why is that ? I would like to know the minimum that can be expected. Is this a bolt-on and you got the HP, or do you need a dynotune (for 500 or 600 bux) in conjunction with the package to get the HP! Basically it's all a complete intake upgrade...

Stage 1- Up To 400HP

Vortex Ram Air Induction Box

Vortex Power Duct with silicone couple

(97-00 includes Upgraded MAF Housing and MAT sensor)

Item 300-050 (97-00) $670.00

http://www.breathlessperformance.com...0-050stage.asp


now this would be great, if, it works ! I would buy, install and be done with it, and my car would be around 4/10ths faster !
no way you will hit 400 with that.

Also companies who claim a certain HP gain for a product, they forget to mention that it is WITH a dyno tune.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 10:59 AM
  #4  
Nightshifter's Avatar
Nightshifter
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota Florida
Default

That's what i would think ! Another example: Vararam. Stock motor, no tune, no other mods, 3/10th's off in the quarter ! Is this ???
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 11:22 AM
  #5  
travelingypsye's Avatar
travelingypsye
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,956
Likes: 2
From: Indianapolis In
Default

I strongly suggest a dyno tune. I just had one & I can tell a HUGE difference. My #'s b-4 & after dyno tune.

b-4;
299.3 RWHP @ 5300 rpm & 315.4 RWTQ @ 4500 rpm

after:
336.3 RWHP @ 5300 rpm & 361.3 RWTQ @ 4400 rpm

The BEST $375 I ever spent......

Now that I have the engine performing at its best, I can look for performance mods that will enhance what I have.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 11:30 AM
  #6  
Nightshifter's Avatar
Nightshifter
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota Florida
Default

Originally Posted by travelingypsye
I strongly suggest a dyno tune. I just had one & I can tell a HUGE difference. My #'s b-4 & after dyno tune.

b-4;
299.3 RWHP @ 5300 rpm & 315.4 RWTQ @ 4500 rpm

after:
336.3 RWHP @ 5300 rpm & 361.3 RWTQ @ 4400 rpm

The BEST $375 I ever spent......

Now that I have the engine performing at its best, I can look for performance mods that will enhance what I have.
What year vette ? A4 or M6 ? 336 from a stock motor or did you already have some bolt-ons ? Awesome numbers !
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 11:41 AM
  #7  
nickolbag's Avatar
nickolbag
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 3
From: Winter Park FL
Default

Originally Posted by travelingypsye
I strongly suggest a dyno tune. I just had one & I can tell a HUGE difference. My #'s b-4 & after dyno tune.

b-4;
299.3 RWHP @ 5300 rpm & 315.4 RWTQ @ 4500 rpm

after:
336.3 RWHP @ 5300 rpm & 361.3 RWTQ @ 4400 rpm

The BEST $375 I ever spent......

Now that I have the engine performing at its best, I can look for performance mods that will enhance what I have.
you got 37rwhp and and 46twtq from only a tune? somethings wrong with that. just because you have high dyno numbers doesnt mean the engine is performing at its best either.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 11:46 AM
  #8  
Wop1's Avatar
Wop1
Instructor
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 176
Likes: 6
From: Golden Colorado
Default

I bought my '99 A4 with 3.15 gears this June; it's a Friday nite club racer at Bandimere Speedway in Denver. IMO, the only thing that really matters is measurable results, in terms of ET and speed. FYI, a stock C5 A4 is usually in the high 14s at this altitude. That's been true for me (remember this is at 5500 ft. of altitude, figure an extra second ET for that over sea level) I baselined the car in total stock form; then proceeded to do some mods and document improvements. A Corsa cat back was good for 0; the Blackwing with fog lights vented was good for 2 tenths; a set of LG Street headers with hi flo cats and X pipe and dyno tune took it down another 4 tenths. Ported Dart Heads and custom grind cam, 37lb. injectors, ported TB, along with a torque converter are going into it now. We expect that to take off a full second. The short answer is, you can depend on anything that moves more air thru the motor to burn more fuel, make more power. Gears will drop ETs, but can make a nice driver less so, depending on how radical they are.
PS: speed is 4 mph from the baseline, so HP is definitely up.

Last edited by Wop1; Nov 16, 2007 at 11:49 AM. Reason: left out speed
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 11:47 AM
  #9  
travelingypsye's Avatar
travelingypsye
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,956
Likes: 2
From: Indianapolis In
Default

Originally Posted by Nightshifter
What year vette ? A4 or M6 ? 336 from a stock motor or did you already have some bolt-ons ? Awesome numbers !
I have a 99 A-4 & stock except pacecar cat backs & a twin cone intake. I also have 3.42 gears. The numbers surprised both the tuner & me. If there is a 22% loss with an A-4, I should have 400+ at the crank. Now besides the #'s the funny thing is the 3.42 gears. GM didn't even offer 3.42 gears as a option fr an A-4 in 99. I am the 2nd owner & I know that the 1st owner took the car to the dealer for every oil change, battery problem ect. I really don't think SHE had gears added. Go figure?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 11:51 AM
  #10  
CanadianVetster's Avatar
CanadianVetster
Drifting
15 Year Member
Active Streak: 30 Days
Conversation Starter
Liked
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 246
From: Toronto Ontario
Default

2001 m6
before: 309.4 RWHP / 333.5 torque

MODS:
Blackwing intake / smooth bellows
new spake plugs
SLP Sport tuner
Corsa Cat back

332.3 rwhp / 345.8 torque
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 11:53 AM
  #11  
travelingypsye's Avatar
travelingypsye
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,956
Likes: 2
From: Indianapolis In
Default

Originally Posted by nickolbag
you got 37rwhp and and 46twtq from only a tune? somethings wrong with that. just because you have high dyno numbers doesnt mean the engine is performing at its best either.
The tuner ran the car again after seeing the #'s & the same 3's came up again. I agree with you. The air/fuel mix was constant 12.5-12.8 between 3400-5900 rpm. If that isn't near perfect, please tell me what is?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 12:27 PM
  #12  
Nightshifter's Avatar
Nightshifter
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Wop1
I bought my '99 A4 with 3.15 gears this June; it's a Friday nite club racer at Bandimere Speedway in Denver. IMO, the only thing that really matters is measurable results, in terms of ET and speed. FYI, a stock C5 A4 is usually in the high 14s at this altitude. That's been true for me (remember this is at 5500 ft. of altitude, figure an extra second ET for that over sea level) I baselined the car in total stock form; then proceeded to do some mods and document improvements. A Corsa cat back was good for 0; the Blackwing with fog lights vented was good for 2 tenths; a set of LG Street headers with hi flo cats and X pipe and dyno tune took it down another 4 tenths. Ported Dart Heads and custom grind cam, 37lb. injectors, ported TB, along with a torque converter are going into it now. We expect that to take off a full second. The short answer is, you can depend on anything that moves more air thru the motor to burn more fuel, make more power. Gears will drop ETs, but can make a nice driver less so, depending on how radical they are.
PS: speed is 4 mph from the baseline, so HP is definitely up.
Good Post ! Blackwing did that eh ? Hmmm.. that would put me around the 13 mark ! I'm def. going to get an X Pipe because it pulses the exhaust through more efficiently without hurting the exhaust gas velocity. I heard real good things about the X Pipe for our cars.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 12:29 PM
  #13  
Nightshifter's Avatar
Nightshifter
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota Florida
Default

Originally Posted by travelingypsye
I have a 99 A-4 & stock except pacecar cat backs & a twin cone intake. I also have 3.42 gears. The numbers surprised both the tuner & me. If there is a 22% loss with an A-4, I should have 400+ at the crank. Now besides the #'s the funny thing is the 3.42 gears. GM didn't even offer 3.42 gears as a option fr an A-4 in 99. I am the 2nd owner & I know that the 1st owner took the car to the dealer for every oil change, battery problem ect. I really don't think SHE had gears added. Go figure?

Except for the gears, you have an intake & exhaust mod + tune = those figures ... correct ?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 12:31 PM
  #14  
travelingypsye's Avatar
travelingypsye
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,956
Likes: 2
From: Indianapolis In
Default

Originally Posted by Nightshifter
Except for the gears, you have an intake & exhaust mod + tune = those figures ... correct ?
Yes. Like I said, the tuner ran the car twice just to make sure.......
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 01:59 PM
  #15  
noahdr's Avatar
noahdr
Racer
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 464
Likes: 2
From: New Bern NC
Default

Originally Posted by travelingypsye
The tuner ran the car again after seeing the #'s & the same 3's came up again. I agree with you. The air/fuel mix was constant 12.5-12.8 between 3400-5900 rpm. If that isn't near perfect, please tell me what is?
Isn't it supposed to be 14.7/1?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 02:14 PM
  #16  
Nightshifter's Avatar
Nightshifter
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota Florida
Default

Originally Posted by noahdr
Isn't it supposed to be 14.7/1?
One atmosphere is 14.7 to 1

Well there is a stoichemetric ratio that is perfect, then you want to run leaner to produce more power... this of course is with premium or better gasoline and advanced timing...


So even if you're pushing more fuel and air, the ratio will always be the same... just the quantity changes which in affect ups your compression because you have more charge (or denser) in the cylinder thus giving you a more powerful explosion. That's why you def. need a tune because when she start's breathing better front & back, you can burn more fuel & air producing more exhaust, which keeps your exhaust velocity up to create that scavenging affect in the cylinder. Reducing back pressure can hurt if you don't get a tune because you slow down the exhaust gas velocity thus not scavenging the cylinder gases...
There's a fine line here ... sometimes the car will improve without a tune, but from my experience, (well, except turbos.. turbos love a ver nonrestrictive exhaust, you always get plenty of exhaust when you raise the boost), you must do a retune. My Z28 LS1 ran 3/10ths worse with a catback, i put back the stock, and it ran fine again.
It was an A4 also... Most of these products are for one thing... MAKE MONEY ! But most do require a retune. I'm just not that familar with vettes and want to know what is what when it comes to MODS.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 02:16 PM
  #17  
nitrojunky's Avatar
nitrojunky
Burning Brakes
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 893
Likes: 38
From: ATX
Default

Originally Posted by Nightshifter
That's what i would think ! Another example: Vararam. Stock motor, no tune, no other mods, 3/10th's off in the quarter ! Is this ???
Never track tested my Vararam, but on both my C5 and my C5Z it is a very noticable SOTP difference, and this is compared with a stinger-style CAI not a stock filter.

My input:

Don't have data on the individual mods, but

(this is no vararam on either car; both had stinger-style intakes)

LG streets + high flow cats + Ti exhaust + LS6 intake + 160* thermo made my '97 M6 C5 exactly as fast as my stock 01 C5Z from a roll. Don't have times or dynos, but I do have experience from lining them side by side a private track and an '01Z is in the 12's stock.

Last edited by nitrojunky; Nov 16, 2007 at 02:19 PM.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Mods That Work !

Old Nov 16, 2007 | 02:20 PM
  #18  
Nightshifter's Avatar
Nightshifter
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota Florida
Default

Originally Posted by nitrojunky
Never track tested my Vararam, but on both my C5 and my C5Z it is a very noticable SOTP difference, and this is compared with a stinger-style CAI not a stock filter.

My input:

Don't have data on the individual mods, but

(this is no vararam on either car; both had stinger-style intakes)

LG streets + high flow cats + Ti exhaust + LS6 intake + 160* thermo made my '97 M6 C5 exactly as fast as my stock 01 C5Z from a roll.

Sounds like you were pushing 400 FWHP then eh ? LG Streets are def. a good MOD for HP ! Shorties don't do sh*t from what I heard. I wonder about the 160 thermo though. It takes longer for the car to warmup, so in a cooler climate, it probably isn't a good idea. Arizona or Florida should work !

p.s. .. that's some talent driving both cars at the same time

Last edited by Nightshifter; Nov 16, 2007 at 02:30 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 03:11 PM
  #19  
Nightshifter's Avatar
Nightshifter
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota Florida
Default

What about a throttle body ? So far, I'm thinking about doing the Blackwing with a TPIS ported stock TB! Or, Z06 LID with the TB... Then go with an X pipe and catback. Finally get a tune when it's all together. Should be good for 3 or 4 tenths !
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 05:11 PM
  #20  
Nightshifter's Avatar
Nightshifter
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota Florida
Default

Originally Posted by CanadianVetster
2001 m6
before: 309.4 RWHP / 333.5 torque

MODS:
Blackwing intake / smooth bellows
new spake plugs
SLP Sport tuner
Corsa Cat back

332.3 rwhp / 345.8 torque
SLP Sport Tuner ? How did you manage that ?
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:12 AM.

story-0
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-1
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-3
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-24 16:12:42


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

Slideshow: 10 major Corvette problems from the last 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-14 16:37:05


VIEW MORE