C5 Tech Corvette Tech/Performance: LS1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

OHV vs. OHC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 09:47 PM
  #21  
dougbfresh's Avatar
dougbfresh
Le Mans Master
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,993
Likes: 25
Default

Originally Posted by Cobra4B
Yes... but that is not what distinguished OHC from OHV... the term for a traditional cam-in-block motor is OHV. The terms really describe the relationship between the cam and valve not the valve and combustion chamber.

These aren't flat heads.
Valves have not ALWAYS been where they are today (over the combustion chamber), some engines it still isn't (2 stroke engines for example). OHV means the valve is OVER the combustion chamber in the cylinder head. OHC means the cam is also in the head. DOHC means 2 cams in a single head.

Last edited by dougbfresh; Dec 3, 2007 at 10:10 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 09:59 PM
  #22  
Mike Mercury's Avatar
Mike Mercury
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 54,204
Likes: 180
From: S.W. Ohio. . . . . . NRA Life Member
Default

Originally Posted by dougbfresh
Valves have not ALWAYS been where they are today (over the combustion chamber),
right. Just think about what a typical Briggs lawnmower engine looks like after removing the head. Those are called "in line valves"... or the old Ford "Flathead"
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 11:50 PM
  #23  
drivinhard's Avatar
drivinhard
Racer
Supporting Lifetime
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,434
Likes: 18
From: Braselton GA
Default

Originally Posted by RedRiderZR1
Heck, the C6 Z06 revs to 7k out of a OHV engine. Same as my DOHC ZR1.
IIRC, the packaging of the LT5 was done quite well, with the dimensions essentially the same as the L98/LT1, but the ZR1 mill is 84 lbs heavier than an LS7, and with the majority of that extra weight in the 4 cam heads, has a CG probably several inches higher. While that may not seem like a lot in a vacuum (engine on a test stand in a lab) the engine has to move down the road with the car, lower weight and lower CG are both a + to anything trying to change direction, especially when it's sitting on the nose.

Last edited by drivinhard; Dec 3, 2007 at 11:54 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 12:27 AM
  #24  
rustyguns's Avatar
rustyguns
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,251
Likes: 16
From: Phoenix Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by Itallian33
You all are hitting on great ponts. I have heard the Internal combustion engine refered to as "An Elegant Balance", because you can make them so many different ways and with soo many different functions in mind. A Ship motor with a 3 meter bore has the same parts as the engine in your lawnmower, but they are completely diferent.
You will always be able to make more power from a DOHC engine than a OHV engine, all other things being equal, simply because you can spin it faster, but I agree that I don't want to spin my engine to 10k. I like driving down the highway at 1500 and getting 32 mpg
It is possible to use variable valve technology in OHV engines as well. GM uses quite a few cam phazers to advance and retard the timing of their valve trains.
dodge just did it with the new viper!
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 12:31 AM
  #25  
white90conv's Avatar
white90conv
Burning Brakes
Supporting Lifetime
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 807
Likes: 21
From: Los Altos CA
Default

One advantage of 4-valve DOHC engines is that at lower RPM, one intake valve is usually closed (actually the port is blocked) and this results in a flatter torque curve and a less peaky engine. However, I am super impressed with the LSx engines - somewhat higher in displacement but not that heavy and very reliable. I have a Jag with a DOHC V8 and am scared to death of a timing chain failure (which ruins the engine). I have a Nissan DOHC V6 and that requires replacement of the timing belt every 60K miles at about $700 a pop. It used to be that simple OHV engines with hydraulic lifters were limited in RPM due to valve float but most DOHC engines now have RPM limits about the same as the LSX so that advantage is gone.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 08:23 AM
  #26  
c5chines's Avatar
c5chines
Racer
20 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Default

Overhead cam and overhead valve heads look the same on the combustion side.The difference is in the cam placement and valve geometry on the top side.The Ford Modular engines are a great example of why the ohc and dohc is overkill.They are a lot more complicated and less durable, for no gain. Hell, even the dealers considered them throwaways if they needed major internal work.For exotic engines, dohc is the way to go.Think motorcycle technology.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 08:34 AM
  #27  
cruisemon's Avatar
cruisemon
Melting Slicks
25 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 4
From: Brentwood TN
Default

Originally Posted by RedRiderZR1
But for high revving engines (10k as mentioned earlier) You want to have OHC to reduce valve float. That is the only reason I see these days to have a OHC engine.
I guess it's really better that we didn't know 30 years ago that we couldn't buzz a small block like we did. I had a blueprinted 265 K-stock '56 Vette that regularly turned 7200 rpm through the traps. I was an NHRA tech inspector in the late '60s and to mid '70s and saw any number of small blocks running in various bodies in super stock that were spinning 12,000 and one that ran over 14,000 rpm through the lights.

Now if we REALLY want to get serious about high rpms and valve geometry, let's talk about desmodromic valve systems that have NO springs. One cam opens the valve and another cam closes the valve. Use roller bearings on the rod and main bearing journals and you get an engine that is materials of construction stregth and intake and exhaust flow limited. Mercedes raced an engine like this 60 years ago.

Charlie
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 10:15 AM
  #28  
MGorman's Avatar
MGorman
Burning Brakes
20 Year Member
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 866
Likes: 5
From: Jensen Beach FL
Default

As long as we’re getting rid of valve springs, why don’t we just go ahead and ditch the cams too? I’ve seen very interesting research where computer controlled electric solenoids are used to open and close the valves. Limitless possibilities as far as VVT. Very interesting technology. I think current automotive electrical systems will not support the electrical draw of a system like this however.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2027 Corvette Buyer's Guide: Everything You Need to Know!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 10:43 AM
  #29  
dougbfresh's Avatar
dougbfresh
Le Mans Master
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,993
Likes: 25
Default

Originally Posted by MGorman
As long as we’re getting rid of valve springs, why don’t we just go ahead and ditch the cams too? I’ve seen very interesting research where computer controlled electric solenoids are used to open and close the valves. Limitless possibilities as far as VVT. Very interesting technology. I think current automotive electrical systems will not support the electrical draw of a system like this however.
It's been done, even on a Small Block Chevy. I think the new higher voltage busses should have the "juice" to do it. I think they still use springs to close them.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 10:46 AM
  #30  
dougbfresh's Avatar
dougbfresh
Le Mans Master
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,993
Likes: 25
Default

Originally Posted by cruisemon
I guess it's really better that we didn't know 30 years ago that we couldn't buzz a small block like we did. I had a blueprinted 265 K-stock '56 Vette that regularly turned 7200 rpm through the traps. I was an NHRA tech inspector in the late '60s and to mid '70s and saw any number of small blocks running in various bodies in super stock that were spinning 12,000 and one that ran over 14,000 rpm through the lights.

Now if we REALLY want to get serious about high rpms and valve geometry, let's talk about desmodromic valve systems that have NO springs. One cam opens the valve and another cam closes the valve. Use roller bearings on the rod and main bearing journals and you get an engine that is materials of construction stregth and intake and exhaust flow limited. Mercedes raced an engine like this 60 years ago.

Charlie
I saw this technology, I think there is a company doing it now. I need to scour the web again but it seemed pretty cool for some applications. I can't recall what the drawback is (there was one). I think the sealing of "valve" was a real issue (initial sealing and the seal in the long term).
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:11 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-1
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-5
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-24 16:12:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

Slideshow: 10 major Corvette problems from the last 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-14 16:37:05


VIEW MORE
story-8
5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!

Slideshow: 5 most and least popular Corvette model years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-08 13:25:01


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Corvette Buyer's Guide: Everything You Need to Know!

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette buyer's guide

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-17 16:41:08


VIEW MORE