When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Given the choice of saving a LOT of money. An all bore stock stroke will peform better than a stock bore stroker in drag racing and roadracing scenarios.
Valves are unshroud, Quicker Revving, lots more durability.
Bore, hands down! You can save a little money, but the main thing, as Kewlbrz mentioned will the the unshrouding of the valves. Considering most tuners are using the 2.055" valve on their heads and cam packages, this will help A LOT! The stock bore really should not have anything over a 2.02" valve on the intake IMHO.
All bore. Has better bore/stroke ratio. Much better rever. Also, if you ever want to go to a 427 ish motor , all you will have to do is replace the crank. :cheers:
Given the choice of saving a LOT of money. An all bore stock stroke will peform better than a stock bore stroker in drag racing and roadracing scenarios.
Valves are unshroud, Quicker Revving, lots more durability.
I wouldn't go so far to say a 4.10 inch bore is much more reliable than a non bore 382 stroker is unless you are using the 6 litre cast iron truck block.. Produce more power yes, but more reliable? no... My friend has had zero bottom end problems with his 382 stroker...
Hampton
The Big Bore would be better than the stroker only, but go all the way and do both. I was going to do the Big Bore with stock stroke, but I knew I would have wanted the Big Engine. So I decided to go with the ARE 422 Studded Heads and O rings and 300 + shot of direct port Nitrous. That should get me down the track :D
I guess I will have to do that Bird Cage Thingy now :rolleyes:
I wouldn't go so far to say a 4.10 inch bore is much more reliable than a non bore 382 stroker is unless you are using the 6 litre cast iron truck block.. Produce more power yes, but more reliable? no... My friend has had zero bottom end problems with his 382 stroker...
Tony
Quote from Nick Agostino:
"The reliability of the resleved blocks at this point in time is not an issue at all, we have run a few in a roadrace conditions all year, 800+rwhp on No2 and everyday driving. A few years back there were some problems with this procedure and have learned the "hard" way but have learned! There is no dought that the "r" block is a better choice but the extra $4000+ in a job may make it affordable to some that don't have it, we were just trying to make the big engines "affordable", at least a bit more to some. "
Also even when going a superstroker, its better to have bore over the stroke combination.
There is a trick to sleeving the blocks! I believe that Judson (SAM racing Camaro) was the first to figure this out. If you notice, they are still on their first motor. :) Must be a pretty good school...
So Tony, your statement some-odd months ago was completely true, but the reliability issuses with sleeving them is pretty much solved. :)
There is a trick to sleeving the blocks! I believe that Judson (SAM racing Camaro) was the first to figure this out. If you notice, they are still on their first motor. :) Must be a pretty good school...
So Tony, your statement some-odd months ago was completely true, but the reliability issuses with sleeving them is pretty much solved. :)
Well, when they put 30 K miles on that motor in one year...I'll believe it! :) That car is far from daily driver status. :)
Who is this person Nick is talking about? I'm seriously interested in talking with him. I see no value in building a stroker if you can't force feed it nitrous! :)
I only debated the all bore being more reliable than the all stroke statement.
Not a week has gone by where their car has not been to the track. It usually goes a few times a week!!! Putting miles on your car a 1/4 mile at a time is probably a little more stressful that cruising to Austin... ;) Especially when you are floating the front tires the first 60'!!! :) :)