Tuning Pfadt Suspension
Current Setting for Stiffness of Shocks is 7 in front and 6 in the rear.
My biggest concern is regarding spring preload: When I received the coilovers the springs were pretty much loose with no preload at all. I adjusted the seats so that the spring was tightly held in place without compressing or preloading the spring. But it quickly became obvious that no preload = bad characteristics when hitting bumps on the freeway. The lack of preload seemed to allow the rear end to float as if it was getting airborne whenever I hit a bump.
Recently I added 3 full turns of tension to the front and rear coilovers by adjusting the lower seat of the springs. Since this would also lower the car even more, I compensated for this by increasing the length of the shock body to maintain my previously set ride height. The effect that I noticed was that this adjustment of preloading the spring and increasing the length of the shock body also increased the amount of travel in the shock. Perhaps this could be a problem as well?
Adding the three turns of preload eliminated the problem of the rear floating when hitting bumps, but now rear end feels very harsh. But the front end of the car feels balanced.
I am unsure whether to reduce or add more preload to the rear springs. Or whether I am headed entirely in the wrong direction... I am looking for recommendations on how others have set up these coilovers on their cars, including shock stiffness, number of turns of preload on the springs, etc... Thanks in advance for your feedback.
He will be able to give you the best advice concerning your issues and probably be able to advise you about shock settings etc. for best results in your particular application.
They are very helpful and Im sure will be able to get you straightened out. Seems most people who run their coilover set-up love them
Cheers,
Tony
There is a large bridge over the entrance to San Francisco Bay that I have an INCREDIBLE deal for you on ........
contact me ....
There is a large bridge over the entrance to San Francisco Bay that I have an INCREDIBLE deal for you on ........
contact me ....

There is a large bridge over the entrance to San Francisco Bay that I have an INCREDIBLE deal for you on ........
contact me ....

the stock suspension wasn't designed for all out performance. it was made to fit within the budget given to the engineers, and to be cost effective for gm to mass produce. there is a reason that the C5-R has coilovers.
Last edited by aris; Mar 11, 2008 at 09:11 PM. Reason: i thought it may have been a little mean.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
There is a large bridge over the entrance to San Francisco Bay that I have an INCREDIBLE deal for you on ........
contact me ....

There is a large bridge over the entrance to San Francisco Bay that I have an INCREDIBLE deal for you on ........
contact me ....

Look at a race team ... NASCAR, F1, whatever ... any race team is adjusting the suspension before a race (and even during) not because they are "cheap" suspension systems, but because one track is different from another, and even a single track changes as its temperature varies, the amount of grip due to rubber on the track varies, etc.
The reason for a suspension set-up like the Pfadt system is to allow people who actually KNOW what they want/need from the suspension to adjust the suspension to accomplish their goals. Another way to do it could be by allowing the user to alter the "programming" of cars fitted with the MSRC system. Another way to alter the cars suspension is by choosing a shock with a differnt valving, such as the 2004 Z06 shock .... there are MANY ways to alter how the car handles .... even GM offers you "choices" such as MSRC (F55) and Z51 ....
Make no mistake .... GM spent many MILLIONS of dollars designing and tuning the Corvette suspension .... even to the point of shipping cars to Germany for testing at the Nurbergring ... after many many months of testing at Milford .... the suspension is not cheap .... you need to be a pretty good student of suspension systems to do better than GM did ... installing an "adjustable" system is STUPID if you don't know what to adjust .........
Last edited by BlackZ06; Mar 12, 2008 at 05:13 AM.
Look at a race team ... NASCAR, F1, whatever ... any race team is adjusting the suspension before a race (and even during) not because they are "cheap" suspension systems, but because one track is different from another, and even a single track changes as its temperature varies, the amount of grip due to rubber on the track varies, etc.
The reason for a suspension set-up like the Pfadt system is to allow people who actually KNOW what they want/need from the suspension to adjust the suspension to accomplish their goals. Another way to do it could be by allowing the user to alter the "programming" of cars fitted with the MSRC system. Another way to alter the cars suspension is by choosing a shock with a differnt valving, such as the 2004 Z06 shock .... there are MANY ways to alter how the car handles .... even GM offers you "choices" such as MSRC (F55) and Z51 ....
Make no mistake .... GM spent many MILLIONS of dollars designing and tuning the Corvette suspension .... even to the point of shipping cars to Germany for testing at the Nurbergring ... after many many months of testing at Milford .... the suspension is not cheap .... you need to be a pretty good student of suspension systems to do better than GM did ... installing an "adjustable" system is STUPID if you don't know what to adjust .........

i will stand by the idea that GM would not have gone with a leaf spring setup had a large enough budget been allocated to them.
do the leaf springs work? yes.
do the coilovers work better, and have more potential? yes.
.
















