When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
From: It's true money can't buy happiness, but it is more comfortable crying in a Corvette than on a bicyc
St. Jude Donor '13
Since the topic of heat was brought up.....the seller I bought my gasket from sent along a "free tip", his advice is/was to remove the gasket up by the windshield to allow air to flow out, thereby reducing underhood temp, and also to hold the front of the car down at high speed. Which I never saw a need for. His claim is air trapped under the car creates lift and removing the gasket allows the pressure a place to escape. It makes sense but again at 130 I never thought the front was floating like some other cars I've driven that fast. However I figured that this summer I will try the gasket removal and see if it does lower the temps under the hood.
Since the topic of heat was brought up.....the seller I bought my gasket from sent along a "free tip", his advice is/was to remove the gasket up by the windshield to allow air to flow out, thereby reducing underhood temp, and also to hold the front of the car down at high speed. Which I never saw a need for. His claim is air trapped under the car creates lift and removing the gasket allows the pressure a place to escape. It makes sense but again at 130 I never thought the front was floating like some other cars I've driven that fast. However I figured that this summer I will try the gasket removal and see if it does lower the temps under the hood.
Since the topic of heat was brought up.....the seller I bought my gasket from sent along a "free tip", his advice is/was to remove the gasket up by the windshield to allow air to flow out, thereby reducing underhood temp, and also to hold the front of the car down at high speed. Which I never saw a need for. His claim is air trapped under the car creates lift and removing the gasket allows the pressure a place to escape. It makes sense but again at 130 I never thought the front was floating like some other cars I've driven that fast. However I figured that this summer I will try the gasket removal and see if it does lower the temps under the hood.
Mine has seen speeds over 180 MPH and with a seal.
No prob. The Corvette as we all know pulls down at higher speed.
The Vette is a bottom feeder not a hood crack breather.
Actually on a stock setup the car does get some air into the breather from the crack in front of the hood. That's why I imagine they put the small hole in the top of the breather, the Z06 has a larger hole because the foglight shrouds are opened up. The majority of air entering a stock breather comes from inside the engine bay through channels underneath the breather. The air coming in from the bottom is primarily for cooling.
Actually on a stock setup the car does get some air into the breather from the crack in front of the hood. That's why I imagine they put the small hole in the top of the breather, the Z06 has a larger hole because the foglight shrouds are opened up. The majority of air entering a stock breather comes from inside the engine bay through channels underneath the breather. The air coming in from the bottom is primarily for cooling.
When you say breather, are you talking about the intake filter?
Ed
Actually on a stock setup the car does get some air into the breather from the crack in front of the hood. That's why I imagine they put the small hole in the top of the breather, the Z06 has a larger hole because the foglight shrouds are opened up. The majority of air entering a stock breather comes from inside the engine bay through channels underneath the breather. The air coming in from the bottom is primarily for cooling.
Making it a bottom feeder. The cooling for the radiator comes from the bottom. That is why you have the movable air dam under the car.
The hole that you talk about was not on a stock C5. The stock filter cover had a solid top and slits around the edge for air to enter.
The Z06 had 2 different sizes of hole. I upgraded to the larger one. The way the "breather" as you call it, gets are is from the bottom. That is why some people that do the zip tie and such also cut out a square under the stock tray. The hole is mounted up under the front bumper, not behind the "crack" The only thing coming in the crack is water and a bit of air.
That is why the hood seal is recommended for people with open air filters, or the zip tie mod or similar (swiss cheese etc).
Making it a bottom feeder. The cooling for the radiator comes from the bottom. That is why you have the movable air dam under the car.
The hole that you talk about was not on a stock C5. The stock filter cover had a solid top and slits around the edge for air to enter.
The Z06 had 2 different sizes of hole. I upgraded to the larger one. The way the "breather" as you call it, gets are is from the bottom. That is why some people that do the zip tie and such also cut out a square under the stock tray. The hole is mounted up under the front bumper, not behind the "crack" The only thing coming in the crack is water and a bit of air.
That is why the hood seal is recommended for people with open air filters, or the zip tie mod or similar (swiss cheese etc).
When you say "bottom feeder" it suggests the engine gets air to the intake from the bottom of the car. On a stock set-up that is just not the case directly but indirectly being the air has already passed thru the cooling system. Any opening, including the crack between the nose and hood, that introduces ambient temperature atmosphere (cooler air) into the engine bay is a plus for a stock set-up.
I know how the car gets air. I have had the stock set-up (2002 vert) which does have the small hole in the top. I then tried the zip-tie mod. I then went to the Vararam and I finally settled on "this" which has worked well for me so far.
Highly recommended with the Vortex Rammer. Keeps engine bay clean and the filter dry.
No overheating no matter if driving in the city or autobahn.
I don't understand this one either. The Vortex Rammer requires a hole to be made in the radiator shroud exposing the filter to the elements under the car. The Rammer has a cover over the filter in the engine bay. A hood seal may keep the cover clean and dry but not the filter.
I don't understand this one either. The Vortex Rammer requires a hole to be made in the radiator shroud exposing the filter to the elements under the car. The Rammer has a cover over the filter in the engine bay. A hood seal may keep the cover clean and dry but not the filter.
I have a vortex on my 01 C5 so I thought I would chime in here. I also have the seal, mostly for keeping the engine bay neat and tidy. It does accomplish that as it is much cleaner since the install. 2nd the box will protect it from the engine bay elements. Here is the problem with ithe vortex though it uses a duct you install under the box to get more air forced to the filter. Here is what I have experianced. With the seal only nothing changed temp wise within the engine (I have a raytech which is used for temp indication) With the box over the filter the filter did stay cooler. With the seal, filter, and box nothing changed temp wise (enough to account for error) With the little scoop attached though I did notice a differance and that is that my coolant, trans, oil temps all were about 5-8 degrees hotter during the same driving conditions. I removed the scoop as I felt it robbed from the radiators. So my opinion is there was no diffrence with or without the seal temp wise (external temp) only change was with the vortex scoop installed (and it was not a good change IMO) Also my element does not get any dirtier than the K/N open element in my truck (filter is in the engine bay on top)
When you say "bottom feeder" it suggests the engine gets air to the intake from the bottom of the car. On a stock set-up that is just not the case directly but indirectly being the air has already passed thru the cooling system. Any opening, including the crack between the nose and hood, that introduces ambient temperature atmosphere (cooler air) into the engine bay is a plus for a stock set-up.
I know how the car gets air. I have had the stock set-up (2002 vert) which does have the small hole in the top. I then tried the zip-tie mod. I then went to the Vararam and I finally settled on "this" which has worked well for me so far.
When the car is moving the flow of air goes up over the bumper and to the cowl. It does not enter the engine bay at the "crack". I have seen the wind tunnel tests and the CAD tests, no air enters the crack.
Again, Water is the main concern here, that it what the seal is for.
Gm most likely did not add a seal in this area because you would need to remove and replace it every time you need access to the bumper.
The seal is just a protection mod, it keeps the engine bay cleaner and the aftermarket filters from getting wet and damaged.
From: It's true money can't buy happiness, but it is more comfortable crying in a Corvette than on a bicyc
St. Jude Donor '13
I also wondered about the claims of the Vortex rammer and others that tapped into the shroud. They claim cold air intake yet I can't help but think you'd still suck some heated air from the condenser and radiator. The cold air enters from the bottom, heat rises, and then your intake sucks from higher up which is also narrower and closer to the heat sources. That's my opinion on these type of cold air ram air systems. Long live my Vararam.
And of course I also run a performance hood seal too. On topic comment.