When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Don't most people just assume a 15% drivetrain loss and multiply the rwhp by 1.15? That sounds about right...The C6 Z06 dynos at 439ish stock.... 439 * 1.15 = 504.85
Don't most people just assume a 15% drivetrain loss and multiply the rwhp by 1.15? That sounds about right...The C6 Z06 dynos at 439ish stock.... 439 * 1.15 = 504.85
Mine: 429rwhp * 1.15 = 493 bhp
Not quite. The formula for RWHP from BHP (Crank) is BHP*0.85 = RWHP. So to go backwards it is RWHP/0.85 = BHP.
Although 15% loss has been discussed at length and you might get a WHOLE lot of different answers on this, 15% is a good estimate, but the really important thing is how much gets to the road and how well you know how to us it.
Chassis dyno's are mostly used for comparison tuning. Dyno the car, make the changes, re-dyno the car and measure the difference to SAE standards. Comparing the amount of drive train/rotating mass loss from one day to another on a chassis dyno can be very misleading. You know every C6Z leaves the factory at 505 hp SAE and if you were to make three dyno pulls and you will see the different hp readings and they more that likely are different from someone else's hp claims. Then you have the different types of dyno's--drum, load bearing, etc....otherwise know as dynojet, mustang, etc.
Bottom line there are some general "rule of thumbs" but non are accurate
Not quite. The formula for RWHP from BHP (Crank) is BHP*0.85 = RWHP. So to go backwards it is RWHP/0.85 = BHP.
Although 15% loss has been discussed at length and you might get a WHOLE lot of different answers on this, 15% is a good estimate, but the really important thing is how much gets to the road and how well you know how to us it.
Multiplying by 1.15 and dividing by .85 provides you with 2 different answers. Dividing by .85 is the correct way.
The general rule of thumb is a 15% drivetrain loss for a manual transmission and 20% for am automatic. However, people still use those percentages no matter what the car is putting down at the wheels. That doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me, as I do not believe drivetrain losses will increase in a linear manner with power output. About the only real measure, IMHO, would be to pull the engine and dyno it, and then reinstall it and dyno the car at the wheels. Obviously, no one would want to do that, which, come to think of it, is probably why 15% and 20% are always used.
Ed
The general rule of thumb is a 15% drivetrain loss for a manual transmission and 20% for am automatic. However, people still use those percentages no matter what the car is putting down at the wheels. That doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me, as I do not believe drivetrain losses will increase in a linear manner with power output.
So how do you think drive train loss will change with increased engine power output?
I personally believe that drivetrain loss will vary somewhat as power increases. Don't have proof off hand but I'm certain that it can be proven.
I'm with you ... and to be more specific the loss % probably increases slightly as the HP levels go up. As an extremely simple example, the drive train loss % might be 12% at 100 HP, 15% at 400 HP and 18% at 700 HP.
I'm with you ... and to be more specific the loss % probably increases slightly as the HP levels go up. As an extremely simple example, the drive train loss % might be 12% at 100 HP, 15% at 400 HP and 18% at 700 HP.
If you had read my reply, that's what I said. I don't believe that drivetrain loss increases in a LINEAR manner. In other words, it may be 15% with a 350hp engine but a different percentage with a motor of greater, or lesser, power. There's just no way to figure it out without dynoing a motor seperately from the car, and then dynoing with the motor in the car. However, personally, I believe that with higher horsepowers, while total drivetrain loss increases, the percentage of drivetrain loss will decrease. In other words, a 700hp motor will have greater drivetrain loss than a 350hp motor, but not twice as much.
Ed
If you had read my reply, that's what I said. I don't believe that drivetrain loss increases in a LINEAR manner. In other words, it may be 15% with a 350hp engine but a different percentage with a motor of greater, or lesser, power. There's just no way to figure it out without dynoing a motor seperately from the car, and then dynoing with the motor in the car. However, personally, I believe that with higher horsepowers, while total drivetrain loss increases, the percentage of drivetrain loss will decrease. In other words, a 700hp motor will have greater drivetrain loss than a 350hp motor, but not twice as much.
Ed
After reading this reply of yours, it's really not what you think I said, as I think the % of drivetrain loss will increase with increased HP levels, not decrease like you theroize.
So you're saying a drivetrain becomes more efficient as the power going into it increases. I don't think so ... why would it magically become more efficient with more stress on it?
When is that damn ZR1 going to hit the dyno so we can have more info...
Exactly ... this will give a good date point on the upper end of the HP range. Once the ZR1 dyno HP numbers start coming in, someone could compare 2001 Z06, 2002-2004 Z06, C6 Z06 and ZR1 numbers and determine the percentage of drivetrain loss and if there is a change in the % loss trend with HP levels.