When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Mine is a Spec 3+ single. I ve driven it about 100 miles now and it seems to be useable- I wish it released higher but im getting used to it. What im not used to yet is the aluminum flywheel... You have to rev it alot higher to get it rolling from a dead stop now... I wonder if it ll rev up alot faster? I hope its worth it.
Mine is a Spec 3+ single. I ve driven it about 100 miles now and it seems to be useable- I wish it released higher but im getting used to it. What im not used to yet is the aluminum flywheel... You have to rev it alot higher to get it rolling from a dead stop now... I wonder if it ll rev up alot faster? I hope its worth it.
I wonder if an adjustable master would alleviate this issue?
k called spec again today.... bunch of contradictory information
Spec says 100% to use the shim
Tick just installed one on my buddies SS trim twin....no shim required and they measured
England green...they said they only installed 1 but it didnt need one but that was with a different bellhousing
ECS....100% no shim required on C5s
so I leave you at that
I have to wonder if the shim is a bandaid for the crappy stock master not putting enough fluid in the slave to disengage the clutch all the way
k called spec again today.... bunch of contradictory information
Spec says 100% to use the shim
Tick just installed one on my buddies SS trim twin....no shim required and they measured
England green...they said they only installed 1 but it didnt need one but that was with a different bellhousing
ECS....100% no shim required on C5s
so I leave you at that
I have to wonder if the shim is a bandaid for the crappy stock master not putting enough fluid in the slave to disengage the clutch all the way
Sounds like with all of Kurt's mods lately, Tick adjustable sounds on the way!
Sounds like exactly that! Im really considering it myself. Its the only choice -imo- if i want to bang the gears any more aggressively than "granny shifting". Also- Thanks Kurt, for the info!
Hmmm I guess the best thing to do is go with what the manufacture recommends. Anyone have the clutch installed with shim and can you provide us with any feedback?
Well, I got the car buttoned up today and the clutch so far feels great! It has almost stock-like pedal pressure and grabs on demand and no chatter. We used the shim per Specs over the phone instructions. We put in all new slave and master. We also put in a set of Pfadt shocks and Pfadt comp sways and hypercoil composite leaf springs. All to be tested next week at Spring Mountain for Corvette Track days.
Sounds like with all of Kurt's mods lately, Tick adjustable sounds on the way!
I spoke with Tick today - they are having a sale/group purchase for the f-body version only @ ls1tech - so no rush as the vette version is regular price. They told me that the tick master for the vette can be installed at a later date without removing the torque tube, etc. So, I am going to install the spec twin and do the drill mod to increase the flow from the stock master cylinder. If needed, I will buy and install the tick adjustable master cylinder at a later time.
Did you measure or did you just put the shim in and go?
I plan on measuring and using the shim, if needed.
I went ahead per Specs over the phone directions and used the shim. My installer looked at it and thought the shim wasn't necessary, but Spec said "yes" and if something goes wrong I'll be contacting Spec.
Originally Posted by 2GOFAST
I spoke with Tick today - they are having a sale/group purchase for the f-body version only @ ls1tech - so no rush as the vette version is regular price. They told me that the tick master for the vette can be installed at a later date without removing the torque tube, etc. So, I am going to install the spec twin and do the drill mod to increase the flow from the stock master cylinder. If needed, I will buy and install the tick adjustable master cylinder at a later time.
I thought the same thing. I went with a Napa master and if it fails I'll be calling Tick too!
Bill sorry just caught this thread...I didnt take pics of measuring
I put a piece of flat stock on a properly tq'ed clutch...has to be fully installed
then i took a caliper used the depth side of it with another piece of flat stock laid on the bellhousing to tq tube surface. Took the measurement...try and get a few for a accurate measurement...then depending on how you took this measurement add and subract the values of the flat stock (add the flatstock thickness that i had on the clutch fingers and subract the flatstock thickness on the mounthing surface of the tq tube and bellhousing
write down that measurement A
next is to install your slave without a shim have someone hold the slave completely depressed. Take the measurement from the throwoutbearing surface to the tq tube surface....add subract the values for however you got this measurement
write down this measurement B
the value of A should be (varies from who you talk to) 1/16-1/8"(Ticks recommendation) larger than the value of B....or Slowhawks recommendation 1/8 to 1/4 difference...his reasoning for the larger value was as the clutch breaks in/wears the fingers will come out thus making this distance smaller
I measured and came up with 3/16"
I called Tick they said if i was to use the stock master they would shim it (shim was a hair over .100 thick) if I was to use the Tick master they would not shim it.
So my thinking...I'd rather have to install a master for disengagement issues (dont have them but IF) than to take it apart and pull a shim out due to preloading the clutch issues or as the clutch wears this distance shrinks and could possibly preload the clutch causing premature wear due to clutch not fully engaging
Say if if one had a measurement of 1/8 without the shim (.125) and used the shim per specs instructions (shim was approx .108 that would only leave .017 gap for breakin/wear....so I think I did right
Hope all that makes sense, I have about 500 miles on my PT trim now...FINALLY most of my chatter is gone...all I have spoke to with the SS trim say it is like butter, no chatter even right after install/for breakin process
Pedal pressure is light and this baby grabs
Last edited by Kurtomac; Mar 18, 2009 at 09:11 PM.
Hey guys...I just found this thread and wanted to provide some info from the "horse's mouth" so there was no further confusion of this point. Our initial Twin didn't require the use of the shim as a result of our use of a taller diaphragm. Nearly a year and a half ago we switched to a shorter diaphragm and as a result require the use of the shim with our Super-Twin on LS based applications. I apologize for any confusion regarding this. Please let me know if you all have any further questions. Thanks as always!
Hey guys...I just found this thread and wanted to provide some info from the "horse's mouth" so there was no further confusion of this point. Our initial Twin didn't require the use of the shim as a result of our use of a taller diaphragm. Nearly a year and a half ago we switched to a shorter diaphragm and as a result require the use of the shim with our Super-Twin on LS based applications. I apologize for any confusion regarding this. Please let me know if you all have any further questions. Thanks as always!
I will be pulling my ENTIRE drive train soon to repair my BROKEN STARTER boss on the engine and will be installing my SPEC Duel Disk during that repair.
SO,,,,if I conduct NAT'S A$$ measurements (thanks Kurt) and it indicates that I DO NOT need a shim, what would be your recommendations on shim installation??????
If the measurements call for a shim,, its getting one. I also have a TICK Master to install.
Please let me know what you think about the measurement dilemma.
From: Arlington Texas, originally from San Angelo, TX
Originally Posted by Kurtomac
spiral i thought you had the twin....sorry in the PMs i was under the impression that you had a twin
OK here we go
the stupid sheet that comes with the spec clutches says not used in most vettes....im pretty sure thats a general sheet included in all spec lsx kits
I talked to spec a couple times on this....they said origionally they designed this new twin to not require a shim....there was some inconsistency with this due to people installing specs in the past and using shims so they were using shims....this was causing the slave to preload the clutch and causing premature clutch failure....so they told me they did a slight redesign to where it requires the use of a shim 100% of the time (twin disk that is...i didnt ask about singles) on the C5 vette
heres where **** contradicts this info
PMed ECS...they say no shim on C5s with the twin but I didnt mention what spec had told me about the slight redesign to require a shim
PMed Slowhawk...he said he's only used a shim a hand full of times on C5s with a twin (Slowhawk says the same as Tick Perf...measure to be sure) Slowhawk has also installed quite a few of these
My buddy Blu on here...his car (1999 FRC) is at tick perf finishing up his clutch and header swap...hes using the SS trim twin...Tick measured and guess what...no shim was required...I called Tick and spoke with the installer jonathan...he told me with no shim he had right at .060 clearance which was perfect...no shim required....
Im also installing my PT trim twin this coming thursday...I'll try this measuring thing...if i cant figure it out...I guess im going to not use the shim...this way worst case I'll have high rpm shift issues...if thats the case...I'll use a Tick adj master and hope that gets rid of the issue
now worst case with shim installed...when no shim is required...you might be preloading the clutch causing it to slip under high load and causing premature failure...nobody wants this so....like tick says....measure to be sure
the writeup is in the manual trans section on LS1tech
v/r
Kurt
That is exactly the point I was going to make. There are other ways to extend throw-out bearing travel (via pushing more fluid with the Titlon/Tick adjustable high volume master cylinder).
I cam across this thread after googling spec clutch shim. I just got off the phone with them. They could not give a definitive answer on the shim issue to me either. It is too much damn work swapping these clutches to do it twice. I'll never bother with a spec product.