When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
My car (98 coupe) is a H/C/I car with no plans for boost. My engine builder is about to install the heads. He has ARP bolts he will give me for free. Should I use them or purchase the studs?
"If higher cylinder pressures are seen or planned for in the future (from whatever source), the studs are better at clamping the head evenly."
Please, somebody tell me where this fairytale came from.
The only difference between the ARP head bolts and studs is the price!
They are the same number of clamps (bolts or studs) determined by the number of threaded holes and the same size.
The also use the same size washers under the heads of the bolts as under the nuts on the studs.
The torque is the same and the block material doesn't change, so where is the advantage?
It comes from numerous removals of the heads, you don't wear the threads in the aluminum block.
In fact from a mechanical standpoint they are more prone to failure then bolts since they add 2 more threads per connection!
Last edited by corvettebob1; Jan 17, 2010 at 02:57 PM.
Reason: spelling
Here's another perspective - I used studs when I did my h/c install several years ago. I bought them with the h/c package from a tuner along with several other upgrades like hardened pushrods and Cometic head gaskets.
Turned out I had issues with the head gaskets which took a while to sort out. I ended up removing/reinstalling the heads 4 times in a month to resolve that issue. Considering what a PITA it is to clean out those head bolt holes in the block, and the consequences if it's not properly done, I was extremely grateful for the studs as I didn't have to soak the coolant out of those bolt holes every time I pulled those heads. From that standpoint, I will lean towards the studs when I do my next build. Also, pulling and installing the heads with studs on a C5 with the engine still in the bay is no big deal - the heads go on/come off with no problem. JMHO.
"If higher cylinder pressures are seen or planned for in the future (from whatever source), the studs are better at clamping the head evenly."
Please, somebody tell me where this fairytale came from.
The only difference between the ARP head bolts and studs is the price!
They are the same number of clamps (bolts or studs) determined by the number of threaded holes and the same size.
The also use the same size washers under the heads of the bolts as under the nuts on the studs.
The torque is the same and the block material doesn't change, so where is the advantage?
It comes from numerous removals of the heads, you don't wear the threads in the aluminum block.
In fact from a mechanical standpoint they are more prone to failure then bolts since they add 2 more threads per connection!
From schpenxel's link:
Studs also provide more accurate and consistent torque loading. Here's why. When you use bolts to secure the head, the fastener is actually being "twisted" while it's being torqued to the proper reading. Accordingly, the bolt is reacting to two different forces simultaneously. A stud should be installed in a "relaxed" mode - never crank it in tightly using a jammed nut.
If everything is right, the stud should be installed finger tight. Then, when applying torque to the nut, the stud will stretch only on the vertical axis. Remember, an undercut shorter stud will have a rate similar to a longer, standard shank stud. This provides a more even clamping force on the head. Because the head gasket will compress upon initial torquing, make sure studs and bolts are re-torqued after the engine has been run.
the other thing that needs to be considered when cmparing studs to bolts is the thread angle.Torque is a measurement of friction not stretch.The shallower thread angle on the nut side of the stud will provide more stretch at the same torque reading.The shallower thread also make for more consistant stretch.Studs have many benefits over the bolts.
But to answer the OP's question-the bolts will be fine in your application
Studs also provide more accurate and consistent torque loading. Here's why. When you use bolts to secure the head, the fastener is actually being "twisted" while it's being torqued to the proper reading. Accordingly, the bolt is reacting to two different forces simultaneously. A stud should be installed in a "relaxed" mode - never crank it in tightly using a jammed nut.
If everything is right, the stud should be installed finger tight. Then, when applying torque to the nut, the stud will stretch only on the vertical axis. Remember, an undercut shorter stud will have a rate similar to a longer, standard shank stud. This provides a more even clamping force on the head. Because the head gasket will compress upon initial torquing, make sure studs and bolts are re-torqued after the engine has been run.
And Heres the rest of the story: Using studs will make it much easier to assemble an engine (especially a racing powerplant which must be serviced frequently and quickly!) with the cylinder head and gasket assured of proper alignment. Alamo Motorsports offers the complete line of ARP Head Studs in addition to ARP Head bolts.
In all honesty I like to see a real side by side comparison using objective data proving the "More even clamp load and twist theory."
I used the ARP bolts when I did mine, I did think about the studs but after discussing with ARP, they thought that there might be a problem installing a head over the studs with the engine in the car. Soooo What I am hearing is the heads will clear between the overhang of the cowl and the studs with no problem???