When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I just recently did a run up to 170 with a 02 Z06 at the same time. We were about even from what I could tell but he started in front of me and I wasn't really paying attention to him. Granted his car is stock and I have a few mods (I also have 3.15s not 2.73s) We both ran out of room at about the same time and both got to around 170. I don't know if that helps any :cheers:
actually, the factory quoted Z06 top speed is at red line not rev limit, and since a stock Z06 can achieve revlimit in 5th gear, the actual top speed of a Z06 is an identical 175/176 mph, same as a 3.42 M6 coupe. the coupe can not reach redline, much less revlimit in 5th, it's drag limited at about 5725 rpm, which is 175 mph, as GM quotes.
BTW - the slowest C5 is an auto 2.73, which will only do bout 170, it has a harder time pulling it's slightly lower 4th (compared to M6 fifth ratio) into the wind, and tops out earlier, even with it's superior drag coefficient (compared to the frc body).
the auto 3.15's supposedly will get the same buck seventy five as the stock 6 speeds. The 99/00 FRC's supposedly had a 2 mph or so top end disadvantage to the 6 speed coupes due to their worse cd..
they say, but I've seen no data, that the 01 and especially 02 coupes, both M and A, are good for a lil more than the older ones due to more power. more power damnit, Scotty more power! I'm nota magican captain, that's all she'll take...
so bottom line, the absolute slowest c5, in every category, would be a 97/98 A4 2.73 car :)
If you use a spread sheet to calc the top speed at 6600 rpm rev-limit (5th gear) on the Z06, it is 177.7mph. Actual tire circumference can make a few mph difference.
The 02 Z06 that 99 Corvette was following only went to 6300 rpm on that run (169.6mph) because I, er, ah, I mean't to say the guy that was driving that car didn't want to hit rev-limit. :blueangel:
If you use a spread sheet to calc the top speed at 6600 rpm rev-limit (5th gear) on the Z06, it is 177.7mph.
No, the actual calc is 174.29 mph. you are (slightly) using the wrong tire height. I am using the "actual, as measured tire height" which accounts for sidewall deflection, not the theoretical height (perfect circle on a tangent)..
In the last dyno of my car it was SAE 502rwhp and 491rwtrq through cats and mufflers. The car is on street tires with stock gears. Is this enough to calculate top speed?
The above numbers were with a 229 cam. To improve idle, etc. I am currently in the process of "camming down" just a bit. What would top speed be if power went to SAE 485rwhp/rwtrq?
Thanks!
PS: On the roadcourses I have been to, no one exceeds 160mph or so.
Mako,
hp/tq does not come into play for speed in gears calcs until overcoming wind resistance matters, which for M6 C5's is in 5th gear.
what's needed is tire height in inches, transmission gear ratio, rear axle ratio, engine rpm, so your not including your rev limit means I can't answer your question. I assume you have a raised rev limit. 502 thru cats/muffs is awesome, you have some beast.
which tracks can you get 160?
I'd posted a thread several weeks ago about the R&T March issue which did a shootout between the Z06, 911 and NSX. One of the things I remember about the article (and I can dig it up again if anyone's interested) is what mph numbers they achieved at redline. I distinctly remember the Z06 hitting redline at 170 in 5th gear, and R&T had "estimated" top speed @ 171.
And honestly, for those of us who have been up in that speed range with six speeds, 6th really doesn't feel like the other 5 in the "pull" department. I've always been curious why it felt like 6th really was just a "coasting" gear rather than a gear that you can really use to accelerate much. Anyone else have a 6th that acts that way?
And honestly, for those of us who have been up in that speed range with six speeds, 6th really doesn't feel like the other 5 in the "pull" department. I've always been curious why it felt like 6th really was just a "coasting" gear rather than a gear that you can really use to accelerate much. Anyone else have a 6th that acts that way?
We all do. The 6th gear is an overdrive gear. Top speed is achieved in 5th gear in all of our 6 speed cars.
I'd posted a thread several weeks ago about the R&T March issue which did a shootout between the Z06, 911 and NSX. One of the things I remember about the article (and I can dig it up again if anyone's interested) is what mph numbers they achieved at redline. I distinctly remember the Z06 hitting redline at 170 in 5th gear, and R&T had "estimated" top speed @ 171.
And honestly, for those of us who have been up in that speed range with six speeds, 6th really doesn't feel like the other 5 in the "pull" department. I've always been curious why it felt like 6th really was just a "coasting" gear rather than a gear that you can really use to accelerate much. Anyone else have a 6th that acts that way?
TX405Z06 definately did 175 in 5th at redline and on GPS. You can IM him if you would like to here it from him. I was also there during the run and I also saw the GPS for verification. Just my .02 :D
We all do. The 6th gear is an overdrive gear. Top speed is achieved in 5th gear in all of our 6 speed cars.
Actually, 5th and 6th gears are both overdriven. The T56 is a 4 Speed Double overdrive tranny with 4th as the 1:1 ratio. The reason 6th gear doesn't pull is at high speeds you do not have the power@RPM to overcome the wind resistance. At lower speeds you CAN accelerate in 6th even though you are making less HP at a lower RPM because the wind resistance is much lower.
Sorry about omission of the rev. limiter: the new limit is a safe 6800. I think top speed in this car will be in 6th gear. It will not max out 6th, but should go a ways up 6th before running out of ponies!
Please calculate it for both iterations of power (i.e., SAE 502 and 485).
My A4 with 2.73's has seen 172, with very little mods (in sig) and without the use of the N20. It still had a little more pull, maybe enough to hit 175. I was at about 58-5900 rpm.