When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
From: You know your drunk when you swerve to miss the tree then you realize its your air freshener! Covington Ga
Vararam Power Duct Installed.
I've been up in th air about getting one to go along with my Vararam. I found one from a local member "phil hunter" for a good price so I figured I would give it a shot.
The install took less than 30min. It was very simple and stright foward. I also moved the MAF in front of the TB. Started the car and let in run for about 5min and then checked the clamps again. No CEL or any off the wall stuff on the start up. I took the car for a test drive and really didnt notice any change in the car. Maybe a little better throttle response, but thats it. I was really just looking for something to do to the car......
It was worth what I paid for it just becasue it looks better than the stock air bridge.
Worth $100+ new? Heck no!!!
Worth buying one used for a good price? I think so.
Look better than stock? Yep
Hard to install? Nope
Power gain? Little if any
Reason to work on the car? Yep
Reason to do some WOT runs to "test it"? Yep
A few cell phone pictures.
Last edited by 0331MARINE; Jul 2, 2011 at 09:44 PM.
Pretty much the same results I got (I paid $87 shipped new) gained 8/100's at the track.I also noticed a bit better throttle response on the street and it looks better.I also relocated my MAF btw,some folks do not.I have had zero problems or codes.
General conception is not to move the MAF location--Reason being is that GM has it programmed to work in it's stock location and moving it may make it read incorrectly---Directly in front of the T-Body would read some turbulant incoming air that is created when the throttle is not WOT--When the blade is only opened slightly the air passes only thu the top and the bottom of the blade and also only the top and the bottom of the MAF-- The MAF wires are in the middle of the MAF !!!!----Of course if you have a tuner you can correct all of this with hours of data logging and MAF table adjustments--But why go thru all that trouble if you don't have to--
JMHO----
From: You know your drunk when you swerve to miss the tree then you realize its your air freshener! Covington Ga
Originally Posted by rebelheart
Pretty much the same results I got (I paid $87 shipped new) gained 8/100's at the track.I also noticed a bit better throttle response on the street and it looks better.I also relocated my MAF btw,some folks do not.I have had zero problems or codes.
Yeah I picked this one up for less than $50. 95% of the people move the MAF. On the Honker you dont have a choice so I dont see a problem with it.
Originally Posted by Joe_Planet
Mine gave me lean codes on front of tb. I moved it back to stock no more codes.
Z06? Or did you de-screen your MAF? Its common to get the codes if you dont have a screen on the MAF.
Yeah I picked this one up for less than $50. 95% of the people move the MAF. On the Honker you dont have a choice so I dont see a problem with it.
Z06? Or did you de-screen your MAF? Its common to get the codes if you dont have a screen on the MAF.
Mine is an 03 z06, no maf screen. I guess these cars are really picky about airflow. I did actually get a CEL even after I got the MAF back to stock location, but apparently it was due to not tightening all the metal band clamps all the way, once I did that the CEL hasnt come back.
Looks good. Glad it was an easy install for you. Sorry you didn't feel any improvement, but I didn't either when it was on my car. Still, you'd think it would add something to the top end HP, give that it has twice the area of the stock one.
From: You know your drunk when you swerve to miss the tree then you realize its your air freshener! Covington Ga
Originally Posted by phil hunter
Looks good. Glad it was an easy install for you. Sorry you didn't feel any improvement, but I didn't either when it was on my car. Still, you'd think it would add something to the top end HP, give that it has twice the area of the stock one.
Phil
No problem Phil, and thanks again. I wasn't really expecting anything power wise, I really did it for the looks. I agree on the top end gain, but we will see once I get a clutch that doesnt slip at 5k.
I'm glad yours fit. The vararam fit great for me and the install was very easy. Until I got to the powerduct. It would NOT fit, it wasnt even close, so I gave up and put the stock bridge back on. Maybe one day i'll try again.
From: You know your drunk when you swerve to miss the tree then you realize its your air freshener! Covington Ga
Originally Posted by ls1vette5
I'm glad yours fit. The vararam fit great for me and the install was very easy. Until I got to the powerduct. It would NOT fit, it wasnt even close, so I gave up and put the stock bridge back on. Maybe one day i'll try again.
I remember reading something about the motors being higher or lower on some of the early C5's.....I think......
Last edited by 0331MARINE; Jul 4, 2011 at 02:34 AM.
Remember that any additional incoming air will swing your LTFT's to go positive dring P/T---However as a safety to protect your engine --
"whatever the positive fuel trim you have just before going to WOT" will be added to your WOT fueling as well---So if your ECM is adding 10% of fuel to correct for a leanness at P/T --It will add that same 10% to your WOT fuel as well--That may explain why your WOT power seems flat
I would check and adjust all your PT fuel trims to be"0" or slightly negative--These changes should be made using your MAF HZ table
A trim that is negative ( correcting for a rich condition during PT) will however lock on "0" during WOT--so the ECM will never remove fuel at WOT via your fuel trims---
Remember that any additional incoming air will swing your LTFT's to go positive dring P/T---However as a safety to protect your engine --
"whatever the positive fuel trim you have just before going to WOT" will be added to your WOT fueling as well---So if your ECM is adding 10% of fuel to correct for a leanness at P/T --It will add that same 10% to your WOT fuel as well--That may explain why your WOT power seems flat
I would check and adjust all your PT fuel trims to be"0" or slightly negative--These changes should be made using your MAF HZ table
A trim that is negative ( correcting for a rich condition during PT) will however lock on "0" during WOT--so the ECM will never remove fuel at WOT via your fuel trims---
I had to adjust my LTFT's after the VR & PD install.Got'em down to the -2 to +2 range.
stupid lean codes came back again.. pretty annoyed and dont want to pay 500 for tune..
going to swap back to stock i think until i do a cam later and get retuned
On a 99 can you relocate the maf to this location? and use the iat sensor grommet as stock with the 99 maf sensor. I dont see how it would change things on f-body ls1 the maf sensor is right infront of the throttle body with a 3" bellow. Not to revive an old thread i was going to do the same. Does the varam power duct come with the coupler to connect the tb-power duct and put the maf in the front of the air duct directly inserted similar to stock or is this not possible?
On a 99 can you relocate the maf to this location? and use the iat sensor grommet as stock with the 99 maf sensor. I dont see how it would change things on f-body ls1 the maf sensor is right infront of the throttle body with a 3" bellow. Not to revive an old thread i was going to do the same. Does the varam power duct come with the coupler to connect the tb-power duct and put the maf in the front of the air duct directly inserted similar to stock or is this not possible?
You can relocate the MAF but it's probably not a good idea. When I did that to my C5 I immediately got lean codes. Not only that, since I have the MAF with the integrated temperature sensor the temperatures reported to the PCM were alot higher when it was located near the throttle body. I was able to connect the Vararam to the MAF in either location.
Last edited by C5MSG2004Vert; Mar 9, 2022 at 01:38 PM.
You can relocate the MAF but it's probably not a good idea. When I did that to my C5 I immediately got lean codes. Not only that, since I have the MAF with the integrated temperature sensor the temperatures reported to the PCM were alot higher when located it was located near the throttle body. I was able to connect the Vararam to the MAF in either location.
so the maf was able to go in either front or back of the plastic housing the varam power duct is made of without damaging the plastic? Do you still have the varam power duct and have pictures of it mounted? I was curious if it came with enough couplers to fit the maf housing infront of the power duct and the rubber 4"-3.5" coupler for the throttle body to the varam power duct.
The f-bodies use the maf sensor similar to the z06 located infront in the throttle body with a 3-4" coupler or bellow. Im curious im the maf tunes are the same calibration or different.
Last edited by Justin Raney; Mar 9, 2022 at 04:10 AM.
When GM was developing the LS1 engine they did extensive testing on where to put the MAF, the air cleaner ducting, the coupler, etc. on both the Fbody and Corvette. once they finalized each of the configurations, they made Firmware calculations for the PCM on the final set up. Because every engine is slightly different in its engine management system the Firmware was designed to average the airflow/engine management parameters to go from Death Valley to Pikes Peak. Many times you can make changes to the air intake to the engine and the car will still live within the parameters but often it will cause changes like lean or rich codes, chugging on decel, etc. Unless you run a scan log after making the changes you will have no idea how they have effective the engine management system.