When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I am changing my LS1 cam to something a little more aggressive,the cam I would like to update to has a .588 lift, should use a single behive for a .600 lift,or go to a dbl spring good for .650 ? Car doesn t see the track and only put on approximatley 3000 mi a year,only drive it on sunny days,wknds,is parked from Nov to May.
Thank you for any input.
PAC 1518 is a good upgrade. It's a beehive that will work with stock retainer and keepers, good to .650 lift, and doesn't increase valvetrain load much beyond what the LS6 springs do. In fact, at .550 lift they only have ~8lbs more open force than the LS6 springs, but higher seat force.
These are well regarded as one of the higher quality replacement springs. I chose them because I was replacing the springs in my stock LS6 after breaking an OEM spring, and I wanted something that would last forever on the stock cam and be able to handle a cam upgrade as well. I'm now running an LPE GT11 cam with .631/.644 lift, but the LS6 has hollow intake and sodium filled exhaust valves... the light weight is a bonus where high revs are considered.
If your proposed cam has really agressive lobes you might need something stiffer; I would talk to the cam manufacturer for specific advice.
PAC 1518 is a good upgrade. It's a beehive that will work with stock retainer and keepers, good to .650 lift, and doesn't increase valvetrain load much beyond what the LS6 springs do. In fact, at .550 lift they only have ~8lbs more open force than the LS6 springs, but higher seat force.
These are well regarded as one of the higher quality replacement springs. I chose them because I was replacing the springs in my stock LS6 after breaking an OEM spring, and I wanted something that would last forever on the stock cam and be able to handle a cam upgrade as well. I'm now running an LPE GT11 cam with .631/.644 lift, but the LS6 has hollow intake and sodium filled exhaust valves... the light weight is a bonus where high revs are considered.
If your proposed cam has really agressive lobes you might need something stiffer; I would talk to the cam manufacturer for specific advice.
Four years on the track with 1518s and no problems whatsoever.
I'm running the double Patriot gold springs for .650 lift. After talking to the guys at Advanced Induction about spring pressure I'm a believer there is HP in having more, not less. With the ramp speeds of these new cam lobes you want the valve train and lifters to stay in place at high RPM. Plus you have the extra spring incase one breaks .... and they do break!
I appreciate the input. the cam mfg, tells me i should go with Precision Race Components .650" double spring kit, I was leaning towards the Pac 1518, which is good to .650". Will have to weigh it all out I guess.
That is the same cam I am looking at 288R, they told me PRC .650 double spring, the one they recommond to you is .600 lift beehive. very interesting scenario. $100. difference, I may as well have the gold as them.
thanks for the vid.
The PAC 1218 or 1518 should do but it also depends on the cam lobes
essentially its the same spring the 1518 is nitrided
True ... BUT, because of the nitrided treatment and nano peened surface, the PAC 1518 is rated for a 0.650" lift whereas the PAC 1218 is rated for a 0.600" lift.
If OP is putting in a cam with 0.588" lift, I'd go with the 1518 for some "safety margin".
If you think about it, the spring only needs to be strong enough to keep the lifter following the cam at whatever rpm you're reving to. Any excess spring force is just making life more difficult for your lifters, pushrods and rocker arms.
There may be a safety benefit to having a double spring in case of failure, but using a .650 lift capable spring on a .588 cam is a pretty good safety margin also.
Make sure, whatever you buy, that it's what you need and not just what happens to be on the shelf and easy to sell.
If you think about it, the spring only needs to be strong enough to keep the lifter following the cam at whatever rpm you're reving to. Any excess spring force is just making life more difficult for your lifters, pushrods and rocker arms.
There may be a safety benefit to having a double spring in case of failure, but using a .650 lift capable spring on a .588 cam is a pretty good safety margin also.
Make sure, whatever you buy, that it's what you need and not just what happens to be on the shelf and easy to sell.
thanks for the input..
mfg suggests the double PRC .650" kit. the pac 1518 is the same only single spring. both do the same job,specs are close to the same,PRC has a little more load pressure. I have seen a lot favouring 1518 and have seen nothing on PRC 650 dbl spring kit.
thanks Al
True ... BUT, because of the nitrided treatment and nano peened surface, the PAC 1518 is rated for a 0.650" lift whereas the PAC 1218 is rated for a 0.600" lift.
If OP is putting in a cam with 0.588" lift, I'd go with the 1518 for some "safety margin".
It really depends on the lobes.. he would have .575 lift and might still should use a double for protection depending on the lobe profile