243 heads on ls3?
Thread Starter
Instructor
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans Louisiana
243 heads on ls3?
What would the compression be if i put factory 243 heads on an ls3 block?
Also, would the ls6 cam work well with that?
Anybody have a setup like that?
If you're curious, I'm wanting to build a budget motor with ls3 bare block and use parts from my ls6. I know there are other options, but I'd like advice on this at the moment. If it doesn't make sense, ill save for a better set-up.
Also, would the ls6 cam work well with that?
Anybody have a setup like that?
If you're curious, I'm wanting to build a budget motor with ls3 bare block and use parts from my ls6. I know there are other options, but I'd like advice on this at the moment. If it doesn't make sense, ill save for a better set-up.
Team Owner
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 43,084
Likes: 33
From: Raleigh / Rolesville NC
There are several builders do taking off LS3 heads and putting on 243 heads onto an LS3 block.
less likely to have the oiling issues of the LS3 heads, under hard hard high G braking or hard high G left and sweeping corners.
Pro
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 654
Likes: 1
From: chandler az
Isn't the LS3 head a rectangle port head? If that's true, the LS3 head is a bigger flowing head than the 243 head. I believe you lose about 5cc of head volume to increase compression, but you lose flow.
I would rather run the LS3 head and use an L76 manifold.
I would rather run the LS3 head and use an L76 manifold.
Last edited by chevylad; Feb 11, 2012 at 10:52 AM.
Instructor
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: Fredonia Wisconsin
In production form the 243 flows about 260 cfm and the LS3 is just
about 300. The thing that flow numbers don't show is port speed
(runner efficiency). The LS3 head at 265 cc of volume compared to 214
cc for the 243, has much less air velocity at low lifts and low rpms. Now
GM also put the LS3 heads on an engine with 30 more cubic inches;
but with an intake runner volume equal to the old big block oval ports,
they really seem to shine on 427 cid and larger engines. I'd bet you will
gain roughly 7/10s of a point of compression and a bunch more low/mid
range torque and throttle response since the 243 combustion chamber
is 64.45cc. I doubt the 01-04 LS6 cam is much if any larger than the LS
3, IIRC 204/218 .551/.547 117.5 ls. If you do make the switch I'd
consider trying to find a cam in the 224-230 duration range which will
bump another 40 or so rwhp while having stock like driving manners.
about 300. The thing that flow numbers don't show is port speed
(runner efficiency). The LS3 head at 265 cc of volume compared to 214
cc for the 243, has much less air velocity at low lifts and low rpms. Now
GM also put the LS3 heads on an engine with 30 more cubic inches;
but with an intake runner volume equal to the old big block oval ports,
they really seem to shine on 427 cid and larger engines. I'd bet you will
gain roughly 7/10s of a point of compression and a bunch more low/mid
range torque and throttle response since the 243 combustion chamber
is 64.45cc. I doubt the 01-04 LS6 cam is much if any larger than the LS
3, IIRC 204/218 .551/.547 117.5 ls. If you do make the switch I'd
consider trying to find a cam in the 224-230 duration range which will
bump another 40 or so rwhp while having stock like driving manners.
Burning Brakes
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 754
Likes: 15
From: Denton Texas
Senior Member
Cruise-In V Veteran
Cruise-In VI Veteran
Cruise-In VII Veteran
2010 L99 block in 2002 WS6 2003 LS6 243s with valve job
nice cam stock LS6 intake CAI headers 452 rwhp A4 compression 11:1 with stock head gasket.
nice cam stock LS6 intake CAI headers 452 rwhp A4 compression 11:1 with stock head gasket.
Thread Starter
Instructor
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans Louisiana
Excellent info. I read that the ls3 cam is identical on the intake side and very close on the exhaust side, compared to ls6 cam. I think I'll get with a vendor to choose a stronger cam. This should fit my needs well
Last edited by mygiftmycurse; Feb 12, 2012 at 11:07 PM.
Corvette Stories
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!
Joe Kucinski
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter
Joe Kucinski
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)
Joe Kucinski
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!
Brett Foote
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know
Joe Kucinski
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2
Michael S. Palmer
Team Owner
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 43,084
Likes: 33
From: Raleigh / Rolesville NC
again the challenge with the LS3 heads is under hard High G braking Oil pools in the heads, or under high speed high G left hand sweeping corners, again oil pools in the heads.
and runs the bearings dry and BANG the engine blows. Only takes a sec or two and that is all she wrote.
and why some builders are going back to a ported polished 243 head for engine reliability.
and runs the bearings dry and BANG the engine blows. Only takes a sec or two and that is all she wrote.
and why some builders are going back to a ported polished 243 head for engine reliability.
