When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have seen references to the A4 wearing out sooner if you are running ported MAF-ends because of vacuum changes. Does this apply to the A4 in a C5 Corvette, or just the F-bodies? I plan on porting mine and re-tuning with LS1-edit.
Re: Does Porting MAF-Ends Hurt an A4? (Vettepartz)
Not vaccuum so much as load. A few of the line pressure related parameters are functions of delivered torque. An artificially lowered load (e.g. as a result of the MAF ends) causes a corresponding lowering of the computed TQ values, in turn resulting in lower line pressures.
I guess I'm not yet convinced that big cam MAP changes toast the A4. I'd like to see some quantification of that first.
Re: Does Porting MAF-Ends Hurt an A4? (ToplessTexan)
Topless Texan, I agree that I would also like to see something more qualifying that supposed result. Also, I think that all else being equal, more air air from the MAF would signify a higher load and not an artificially lowered one, such as encountred when going up a hill. What am I missing here?
Re: Does Porting MAF-Ends Hurt an A4? (Vettepartz)
Two different issues... a) larger than spec diameter MAF ends and b) reduced vacuum with big cams. The first is a legitimate concern, it's the second (not really what you were asking about) I'm not sure about. (More specifically I just haven't seen the connection yet.) You don't get "more air" with larger ends, you do get reduced velocity through the sensor. I'm in the "don't dork with the MAF ends" camp. :)