Blackwing Cover
Can anyone tell me more about it, and what I need to get with it, and where to get the cover, and how much $$$$ it costs , best place to buy etc...Thanks




Nate
Nate
Now the fun starts. The car, as Nate observed above, will most likely surge.
Suggestion: Don't do it. If there's any gain, it will be mitigated by the surging and check engine lights. The Blackwing flows fine as it is, and the God of Ram Air Laminar Flow Bottom Breathers -- Jim Hall, has discontinued his "bottom breather" and now pushing the under the hood model -- with results "just as good." His is basically a smaller filter (less flow) with a sideways mounted powerduct (think Bill Clinton).
Tony
The members that are saying its not worth any gain are incorrect. There is much performance to be had from a Cold Air Intake verses and underhood. When your driving, your underhood is breathing hot air from underneith the car. One vendor tested it and picked up .2 seconds in the quarter with the cover, they had picked up .2 with the Donaldon initially, so the cover was worth the same additional improvment as the filter itself. Of the people I've known to switch between the Donaldson and Vortex (witch is a CAI) they have had noticable gains, according to them, with the Cold Air Intake.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Thanks in advance.
Marc-Bend, Oregon
mschafler@sunriver-realty.com
...I really like the blackwing, but this baby sucks in a lot of hot engine air without the cover. With the cover you can expect a 25 to 30 degree decrease in air intake temps on a hot day.
Tony
"I'm willing to give up a little performance for keeping dirt and water off the filter, so no cutting shrouds. The stock airbox is more restrictive, like a vacuum hose pressed against the carpet. Take it away and the vacuum works better. But to a point.
"I'm not a big fan of cutting the shroud, because there are plenty of areas where air can get to the filter. Like a vacuum cleaner, the engine won't suck more air because it's in a bigger room (or outside for that matter). The MAF flows about 650 cfm per minute, and that's all the access you need. Also, sticking the Halltech TRIC snorkel down to the ground because of a "ram" effect is like running down the hallway with your vacuum cleaner's hose held out in front of you. It will not suck any more air that way either.
"The only way to get more air into a vacuum cleaner (like into an engine -- sheees -- there's that analogy again), is to lock your lips around the hose and blow hard -- on a car that's called turbo or supercharging.
"With regard to the temperature argument, a 10 degree differential is worth about 1% in horsepower. That's the temperature of the air that the engine is sucking, not what it feels like when you touch the exhaust manifold.
"Realistically, when you're moving, the difference in air temperature in the compartment where the stock filter resides vs. outside ambient air is about 0-10 degrees. That equates to a gain of about 2 hp at 30 mph, and 1 hp at 60 mph. Big deal."
So, you pick up about 1-2hp with the cover, and trade a potentially surging car for it. If you go to the Halltech or the Z 0 6 Forum website -- they post results for cars with both the "bottom breathers" and the under the hood models. Looking at the results and differences, I don't think you can draw a clear statistical difference between the two types of intakes. As the man said, "your results may vary."
:cheers:
[Modified by EHS, 11:54 AM 5/21/2002]
This will likely be my next mod. I just recently made Swiss cheese out of my stock airbox, and while I don't have any numbers, I'm convinced I've gained upwards of 10-15HP from essentially converting my air box to an open element filter design. The power increase is evident at the very top end, which makes sense. I tend to be a skeptic, but the thing that tells me I really have gained HP is that I'm now hitting the rev limiter much more frequently than before the mod - it's totally catching me by surprise now.
-Pete
[Modified by DUKE, 11:28 AM 5/21/2002]
Duke, I agree, and I'm going to step out of this thread after this one last post.
If 10 degrees temperature difference is worth 1% more horsepower, then on an otherwise stock 350 hp C5, the difference is about 3.5 hp.
Even if there is a 20-30 degree difference (which there really is not, when you're moving), that's only about 7-10 hp difference (2-3%).
Here's the clincher:
The car weighs 3,246 lbs., which means it has a power/weight ratio of 1 hp for every 9 lbs.
So, for every 9 lbs. you save, you've picked up the equivalent of 1 hp.
Fuel weighs about 6 lbs. per gallon. If you run with 4 or 5 less gallons in your 18.5 gallon tank, you have just picked up more than the difference.
Or, just have the driver lose a couple of pounds.
Now, the question is, can anyone really tell the difference in performance with 4 or 5 additional gallons of fuel? Or for that matter, even with a 150 lbs. passenger?
Food for thought.
:seeya
I tested the air intake temps with an autotap and then also tested the car at the 1/4 mile track. My experiences are for real and my individual testing proved it to me. I guess results may vary, but my AIT IS 25 to 30 degrees cooler with the cover. I also picked up at least 2 tenths and 2-3 mph with the cover.
Tony
Donaldson, Halltech bottom breather, Donaldson with cold air cover, Vortex Rammer, Halltech Air Bridge, Breathless Air Bridge, West Coast Air Bridge.
How's that for wasting some money :lol:
Well I am back to the Donaldson without cold air. Im very pleased with the performance. I didnt see one repeatable .10 of a second between the products at the track. :eek: I ran 12.6's with all the setups listed above. I even ran autotap on the cars intake temp numerous times checking intake air temp. The cold air systems did provide any where from 10-25 F drop in intake temp. However the expected 1%-2.5% increase in HP never showed on a time slip.
There are still some that believe there is a ram air benefit with some of the cold air systems mentioned. Perhaps at 125 mph there is a marginal effect.
:yesnod:
As far as "Real World" results. This isnt the "Real World" its the Corvette Forum
where many who have never popped the hoods of their cars can parrot what they have heard from others until it becomes a truth. :yesnod:
The forum is a great place for sharing experiences but dont believe just because you read here it is "Truth". Popular Opinion Rules Here! :flag
Flame if you must but give it some thought
:cheers:Matthew
Well for what its worth...I have used in the following order.
Donaldson, Halltech bottom breather, Donaldson with cold air cover, Vortex Rammer, Halltech Air Bridge, Breathless Air Bridge, West Coast Air Bridge.
How's that for wasting some money :lol:
Well I am back to the Donaldson without cold air. Im very pleased with the performance. I didnt see one repeatable .10 of a second between the products at the track. :eek: I ran 12.6's with all the setups listed above. I even ran autotap on the cars intake temp numerous times checking intake air temp. The cold air systems did provide any where from 10-25 F drop in intake temp. However the expected 1%-2.5% increase in HP never showed on a time slip.
There are still some that believe there is a ram air benefit with some of the cold air systems mentioned. Perhaps at 125 mph there is a marginal effect.
:yesnod:
As far as "Real World" results. This isnt the "Real World" its the Corvette Forum
where many who have never popped the hoods of their cars can parrot what they have heard from others until it becomes a truth. :yesnod:
The forum is a great place for sharing experiences but dont believe just because you read here it is "Truth". Popular Opinion Rules Here! :flag
Flame if you must but give it some thought
:cheers:Matthew
:yesnod:












