C5 Tech Corvette Tech/Performance: LS1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Frustrating finding correct pushrod length!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 10, 2012 | 06:17 PM
  #1  
REDZED2's Avatar
REDZED2
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 212
From: Winnipeg
Default Frustrating finding correct pushrod length!!!

Soo.... I had my comp pushrod checker bend on me, after hammering it 99% straight again and using vettenuts method. I had 13 turns to close it, adding in .080 preload for LS7 lifters. It came up with a 7.637. WRONG. Did it twice. made sure I had oil in the lifters and they werent dry.... So then I tried the Shane from Thunder Racing method. I had a 7.500 pushrod and snugged it down to zero lash. I knew when I was there.. did that 5 times just to make sure. Got the old torque wrench out set to 22 lbs. Took 2 and just short 1/4 turns to click it to 22 ft lbs. That meant I needed a pushrod roughly .025 shorter than the 7.500 I was using. So a TFS 59 cc head with a 7.475. I ended up with 2 extremes when everyone say I should be somewhere between 7.500 and 7.550. What the hell am I doing wrong here??? I have brand new HS rockers.

Last edited by REDZED2; Jul 10, 2012 at 07:20 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2012 | 06:56 PM
  #2  
lucky131969's Avatar
lucky131969
Tech Contributor
15 Year Member
Active Streak: 30 Days
Community Builder
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,450
Likes: 1,155
From: Dyer, IN
Default

Originally Posted by wantbluC6
What the hell am I doing wrong here???
For starters, using a measurement tool that was hammered back into shape. Get a new one for christ's sake.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2012 | 07:24 PM
  #3  
REDZED2's Avatar
REDZED2
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 212
From: Winnipeg
Default

Originally Posted by lucky131969
For starters, using a measurement tool that was hammered back into shape. Get a new one for christ's sake.
Yeah thanks smart azz. It was slightly bent... cant handle that much spring pressure obviously. Guess I shouldnt have used my remote starter with the adjustable pushrod installed.... The other method came out to roughly 7.475. Could that be OK?? Since TFS recommends 7.500 and my heads are 59cc so .025 shorter doesnt sound too out of question? Although researching I still find 7.500 - 7.550 on milled TFS heads and a comp cam ( smaller base circle)... hmmm i dunno
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2012 | 08:24 PM
  #4  
Paul 75 L82's Avatar
Paul 75 L82
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 5,245
Likes: 25
From: Blue Ridge Georgia
Default

Post this on the LS1Tech forum.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2012 | 09:36 PM
  #5  
feeder82's Avatar
feeder82
Safety Car
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,757
Likes: 1,215
From: Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by wantbluC6
Yeah thanks smart azz. It was slightly bent... cant handle that much spring pressure obviously. Guess I shouldnt have used my remote starter with the adjustable pushrod installed.... The other method came out to roughly 7.475. Could that be OK?? Since TFS recommends 7.500 and my heads are 59cc so .025 shorter doesnt sound too out of question? Although researching I still find 7.500 - 7.550 on milled TFS heads and a comp cam ( smaller base circle)... hmmm i dunno
If you arent using lite cam checking springs on your heads your numbers are going to be all over your compressing the lifter
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2012 | 09:44 PM
  #6  
lucky131969's Avatar
lucky131969
Tech Contributor
15 Year Member
Active Streak: 30 Days
Community Builder
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,450
Likes: 1,155
From: Dyer, IN
Default

Originally Posted by wantbluC6
Yeah thanks smart azz. It was slightly bent... cant handle that much spring pressure obviously. Guess I shouldnt have used my remote starter with the adjustable pushrod installed....
Refer to the word "Never"......


http://www.jesel.com/Instructions/Tools/INS-29425v2.pdf
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2012 | 01:13 AM
  #7  
LSOHOLIC's Avatar
LSOHOLIC
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,536
Likes: 15
Default

Make sure your on the base circle................
Also the lifter is "pumped" up just sitting there with no pressure against the plunger. There is a spring inside the lifter that pushes up on the plunger. So the easiest method is to get a pushrod checker, collapse it all the way, put cam on base circle, tighten rockers all the way down to 22ft lbs then slowly lengthen the expandable pushrod until you have zero lash but not puting any pressure on the lifter. Pull that back apart and measure the pushrod. The length you get is the length you would need for 0 preload. Add .050" to that and you have your preload.

the pushrod is just a function of proper preload on the lifter. The rocker is a fixed fulcrom in correlation to the vavle tip.


Thanks............
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2012 | 07:26 AM
  #8  
vettenuts's Avatar
vettenuts
Team Owner
25 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Photogenic
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 22,025
Likes: 192
From: At the beach in little Rhody
Default

If you use Shane's method, you have to make two corrections when moving off of his one turn number. First, correct for rocker ratio and second correct for the number of turns from the rocker bottoming until full torque is achieved. On my motor with the YT rockers, I found the latter to be 1/3 turn. If I use your 2-1/4 turns and my correction and "assume" a rocker ratio of 1.7 (this may in fact be different on the seat) I get a preload of 0.150" noting that this method is approximate. I spent some time reviewing his method when I did my tapered pushrod swap and when corrected his method and measurements were within a few thousandths but it is also subject to operator error. The best way to measure it to put a dial indicator on the rocker and measure the preload but not sure if you have a dial indicator.

When you are using the adjustable, are you lifting the rocker tip or turning the pushrod to feel for zero lash. Sometimes its helpful to leave a little lifter tick to ensure there is no load on the lifter cup and measure between the rocker tip and the valve stem with a feeler gauge to double check the zero lash number. Whatever you measure you then divide by the rocker ratio to get the amount you need to add to the adjustable pushrod length to obtain the zero lash value.

Were the estimates you have for pushrod length inclusive of the HS rockers and any milling of the head or thinner head gasket (if you used one)?

With this big of a difference, I suspect the adjustable pushrod measurement may be in error and would focus attention on obtaining zero lash.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jul 11, 2012 | 12:29 PM
  #9  
tsts's Avatar
tsts
Drifting
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 9
From: "Philly" Pennsylvania
Default

Read my sig.below; I went with factory preload after there was much debate about the preload and pushrod length with LS7 lifters when they first came out. 7.4's were too tall/tight/noisy. John (deceased) from ECS did an excellent preload measurement and we discarded the 7.4's for 7.35's. 20K miles now, runs great and quiet, no problems.

Last edited by tsts; Jul 11, 2012 at 12:36 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2012 | 12:37 AM
  #10  
REDZED2's Avatar
REDZED2
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 212
From: Winnipeg
Default

Originally Posted by vettenuts
If you use Shane's method, you have to make two corrections when moving off of his one turn number. First, correct for rocker ratio and second correct for the number of turns from the rocker bottoming until full torque is achieved. On my motor with the YT rockers, I found the latter to be 1/3 turn. If I use your 2-1/4 turns and my correction and "assume" a rocker ratio of 1.7 (this may in fact be different on the seat) I get a preload of 0.150" noting that this method is approximate. I spent some time reviewing his method when I did my tapered pushrod swap and when corrected his method and measurements were within a few thousandths but it is also subject to operator error. The best way to measure it to put a dial indicator on the rocker and measure the preload but not sure if you have a dial indicator.

When you are using the adjustable, are you lifting the rocker tip or turning the pushrod to feel for zero lash. Sometimes its helpful to leave a little lifter tick to ensure there is no load on the lifter cup and measure between the rocker tip and the valve stem with a feeler gauge to double check the zero lash number. Whatever you measure you then divide by the rocker ratio to get the amount you need to add to the adjustable pushrod length to obtain the zero lash value.

Were the estimates you have for pushrod length inclusive of the HS rockers and any milling of the head or thinner head gasket (if you used one)?

With this big of a difference, I suspect the adjustable pushrod measurement may be in error and would focus attention on obtaining zero lash.
Vettenuts I always read your posts but sometimes find I get lost technically. LOL.. I did like Shane's method better and I did achieve some credible results. For the record. MLS GM gaskets. 1.7 Harland Sharp non adjustable rockers. TFS 215 heads measure at 59.7 cc. Stock LS6 block and deck. I dont understand what needs revision on Shanes method? Could you explain it in laymans terms please? I got 3/4 of a turn on an intake... and 1 1/2 turns on the same cylinders exhaust valve. So if this is true: I need a 7.525 on the intake and the 7.500 is bang on for the exhaust of this 1 particular cylinder.... Im using a pair of 7.500 pushrods doing this. BTW I dont have a dial indicator and wouldnt have the first idea how to use it.Im a handy turn bolt and assemble kind of guy. Not good with blueprinting tools. LOL

Last edited by REDZED2; Jul 12, 2012 at 12:42 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2012 | 01:14 AM
  #11  
RonSSNova's Avatar
RonSSNova
Safety Car
10 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Photogenic
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 409
From: Portland OR
Default

Originally Posted by LSOHOLIC
Make sure your on the base circle................
Also the lifter is "pumped" up just sitting there with no pressure against the plunger. There is a spring inside the lifter that pushes up on the plunger. So the easiest method is to get a pushrod checker, collapse it all the way, put cam on base circle, tighten rockers all the way down to 22ft lbs then slowly lengthen the expandable pushrod until you have zero lash but not puting any pressure on the lifter. Pull that back apart and measure the pushrod. The length you get is the length you would need for 0 preload. Add .050" to that and you have your preload.

the pushrod is just a function of proper preload on the lifter. The rocker is a fixed fulcrom in correlation to the vavle tip.


Thanks............


No counting turns, just a simple direct method of getting the preload right!

Ron
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2012 | 05:48 AM
  #12  
vettenuts's Avatar
vettenuts
Team Owner
25 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Photogenic
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 22,025
Likes: 192
From: At the beach in little Rhody
Default

Originally Posted by wantbluC6
Vettenuts I always read your posts but sometimes find I get lost technically. LOL.. I did like Shane's method better and I did achieve some credible results. For the record. MLS GM gaskets. 1.7 Harland Sharp non adjustable rockers. TFS 215 heads measure at 59.7 cc. Stock LS6 block and deck. I dont understand what needs revision on Shanes method? Could you explain it in laymans terms please? I got 3/4 of a turn on an intake... and 1 1/2 turns on the same cylinders exhaust valve. So if this is true: I need a 7.525 on the intake and the 7.500 is bang on for the exhaust of this 1 particular cylinder.... Im using a pair of 7.500 pushrods doing this. BTW I dont have a dial indicator and wouldnt have the first idea how to use it.Im a handy turn bolt and assemble kind of guy. Not good with blueprinting tools. LOL
I thought you got more turns using Shane's method. In a nutshell, if you think about what is happening when you tighten the bolt. The rocker tip is on the valve stem and the other end is on the pushrod. As you tighten the bolt, the rocker moves downward pivoting on the valve stem (the valve may open a bit while you tighten but ignore this as the lifter will eventually bleed down). So as you tighten the bolt, the pushrod end moves downward more than the bolt by an amount related to the rocker ratio on the seat. Shane has posted he found that 1 turn of the bolt results in approximately 0.049" of preload (can't remember his exact numbers). However, if you find that the bolt takes more or less turns, then the rocker ratio must be used to correct for how much the pushrod end will move.

The second thing is as you tighten the rocker down, the rocker moves downward into the stand and when it seats in the stand you are still tightening the bolt. However, once the rocker seats further turning of the bolt is not actually providing more preload but rather it is preloading the bolt. This portion of the turn counting must be removed from any calculations because it isn't preloading the lifter. On my motor with my rockers, I found this to be 1/3 turn. It may be different on other motor/rocker setups. When I subtracted this from the turns I was counting using Shanes method, I got within a few thousandths of of the measurement I was taking with a dial indicator.

So using Shane's number for one turn, and subtracting the 1/3 turn that I found my motor required to preload the bolt, I would only get 2/3 turn where the lifter is actually being preloaded. In 2/3 turns, the bolt will move (2.3) X 1.25/25.4 = 0.0328 inches. Since the rocker pivots on the valve stem and the ratio is assumed to be 1.7 on the seat (the stock rocker is actually less, not sure on the HS you are using), the distance from the valve stem to the pushrod in relation to the distance from the valve stem to the bolt is (2.7/1.7) = 1.588. This is then used to correct how much the pushrod end of the rocker moves such that in the example 0.0328" X 1.588 = 0.052", which is pretty close to Shane's value considering counting bolt turns itself is subject to error. The nice thing is that the lifters are somewhat forgiving in that the preload doesn't have to be within a couple of thousandths of an inch to work correctly.

Hope this makes sense.

Also, since you see a large difference between intake and exhaust, I would check another cylinder or two to make sure you get consistent measurements. I would also go with larger OD pushrods than 5/16". I believe later TFS heads will accept 3/8" OD pushrods but would verify with Brian Tooley first. This would provide a much stiffer valve train noting that the pushrods act as springs and you want them to be as stiff as possible.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Frustrating finding correct pushrod length!!!





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:26 AM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE