When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Ok guy I did the search and did not see a lot other than guy put them in. Is this something to consider. I have look at them to bring the temps down some. Then the car is running the 210 mark little more if in slow moving traffic. So the stock one should have been open anyways. I turn the AC on get fans to kick on more and bring temps down.
Put a 160 in mine , no problems and runs around 170-180 most of the time, I also added headers & x- pipe and had it dyno tuned so everything jives. Some people say the LS motors need to run 195+ However PCM in mooresville suggested 160, and they play with these LS motors all the time and get crazy HP# out of them
If I recall, some if the reasons for higher temp is longevity of the engine and efficiency that goes with the temp. I am sure there are more but don't recall right now. Sure you will get more power at the lower temp but are trading off engine life for it. There is plenty of info out there on it and several engineers from the C5 have stated the same thing. So depends on what you are trying to do. Flush out cooling system, blow out radiator/condenser, replace coolant tank cap and ensure no air pockets are in system. Then reprogram fans and see what happens. It is normal for these cars to run in the 220-230 range when sitting still. As long as it drops back down in the high 190's while moving with proper air flow on a stock car.
GL
Chris
210 is not hot and is no where near the boiling point of a proper coolant/water mix especially pressurized. a 160 themostat isn't going to do you any favors and isn't going to fix anything - there's nothing wrong.
it's a known fact LS engines make the most HP with engine temps 195-205. If you don't believe me go over to the HP Tuners Forum and ask these guys, they dyno these everyday. Do some research on fuel atomization .....
Last edited by printmanjackson; Dec 29, 2013 at 01:03 PM.
There are some very good vendor/tuners here on the forum and I can't think of one that doesn't recommend a 160 t-stat and fan adjustment. The lower temperature will help performance but some oils work better at higher temps. You have to decide if you are willing to put up with a little more wear for more performance.
As many long threads as their have been, your search skills must need some work. Try going to Google, type in C5 160 degree thermostat and you'll find lots of pros and cons. I would never run a 160 in my car, but read for yourself and decide.
160 t-stat in mine.. works great! 180 degrees while cruising.. perfect! definitely noticed a difference since its not running so heat soaked.. and the only reason they run the motors hot from the factory is emissions. period.
Thanks guys. I was thinking the fans set lower. I will have it at efi alchemy this week and was just trying to get some in put from the folks that have done the change.
My suggestion is to do a search for "Sweet Spot" here on the forum and read the posts by Evil-Twin who worked for GM during development of the LS1. You can run whatever you like in your car, but you should at least have information from someone who worked on development and testing of the car, which no tuner is going to possess. You may want to simply swap the stock thermostat and lower temperature one in the spring and fall to keep oil temps where they should be.
These engines are designed and blueprinted at running temp, so keep heat and metal expansion in mind. The lower the temp the less metal expansion the more clearance between moving parts the more wear and tear.
I prefer a 180* stat for a street driven car, and have the fans to kick on around 190*.
That's what I run and I never see over 200*, stays at a steady 191* down the road.
You may want to simply swap the stock thermostat and lower temperature one in the spring and fall to keep oil temps where they should be.
what does oil temps have to do with your thermostat? this time of year my coolant is 170-180 with a 160 tstat and my oil temps are 190-210. and no, you're oil doesn't have to be over 212 to flash off water vapor water evaporates VERY quickly at 180+.
Originally Posted by n8dogg
These engines are designed and blueprinted at running temp, so keep heat and metal expansion in mind. The lower the temp the less metal expansion the more clearance between moving parts the more wear and tear.
I prefer a 180* stat for a street driven car, and have the fans to kick on around 190*.
That's what I run and I never see over 200*, stays at a steady 191* down the road.
amazing how much misinformation is spewed in relation to thermostats. on a factory tuned car you can go from 190-230 in minutes and isn't going to cause more or less wear from 165-240. btw, my Z ran 190 with the stock t stat so IDK how a 180 would fare differently, you coulda just ran a 160 and kept your fan temps higher.. there's a reason performance tuned LSx's are running 160 thermostats. lingenfelter and hennessey to name a few all use 160's
Another 160 thermostat here. But it doesn't run at 160. Usually 170's and 180's which is where I like it. Like someone here just said - Your search should have turned up tons of info on this.
amazing how much misinformation is spewed in relation to thermostats. on a factory tuned car you can go from 190-230 in minutes and isn't going to cause more or less wear from 165-240. btw, my Z ran 190 with the stock t stat so IDK how a 180 would fare differently, you coulda just ran a 160 and kept your fan temps higher.. there's a reason performance tuned LSx's are running 160 thermostats. lingenfelter and hennessey to name a few all use 160's
There is a strong debate about 160* being too low for the street due to metal expansion and wear. Driving down the road you should see around 170* with a 160* thermostat. There is a reason why closed loop operation and idle learn starts after coolant temps reach 170*.
There is a strong debate about 160* being too low for the street due to metal expansion and wear. Driving down the road you should see around 170* with a 160* thermostat. There is a reason why closed loop operation and idle learn starts after coolant temps reach 170*.
mine runs fine in closed loop @ 160-165 (on cold days) 175-185 (on warmer days) . I did some digging and closed loop starts at 105-110. so if any problem going into closed loop exists, there will be a CEL first of all and second your tstat is probably stuck open.
mine runs fine in closed loop @ 160-165 (on cold days) 175-185 (on warmer days) . I did some digging and closed loop starts at 105-110. so if any problem going into closed loop exists, there will be a CEL first of all and second your tstat is probably stuck open.
Closed loop may start earlier but a lot of the learn tables (TP, Idle, stft, ltft, etc..) do not learn until closer to operating temp. Yes correct tuning will prevent any problems associated with this. But again there is a strong debate on whether or not 160* is harmful for stock (pistons, rings, block, bearings, etc...) engines.
I don't think there is any support that shows 160*< 180*/190*/200*.
I've yet to come across a GM tune in any system I've looked that required anything close to 170*-180* for closed loop. The 25*C to 35*C range is fairly typical.
Last edited by lionelhutz; Jan 9, 2014 at 05:47 PM.