When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I am not aware of any difference in the design except in 1999 the passenger fuel sender was changed and is different (now 3 wires instead of 4). If you want a 97-98 design then you are into wiring changes and PCM issues.
Some engine delivery fuel is still returned to the passenger tank and a jet pump then transfers fuel to the driver side. The design of all C5's deplete the passenger tank fist and then the driver side.
Forgot to mention that there are differences in where the FPR is located from 99 to 97-98 and that you may have a pulse damper. Not sure when they went to a pulse damper on the fuel rail. They should not relate to whether fuel is returned to the passenger tank.
I was interested in doing the swap of the 98 rails and feed/return lines with the reg and filter separate for my supercharger application. It is said to swap to a return style setup you can run more hp.
I may just run all new stuff since i'll be switching to E85 anyways...
I was interested in doing the swap of the 98 rails and feed/return lines with the reg and filter separate for my supercharger application. It is said to swap to a return style setup you can run more hp.
I may just run all new stuff since i'll be switching to E85 anyways...
Interesting. I'm curious how the change affects flow and/or pressure but you don't need to waste your time bringing me up to speed. I am just curious as engineers are.
If you have a link or write up on it I would be interested in that.
