When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
A cam does not effect your bottom end. There is no cam only car making enough power to break it, and no cam is going to allow it to breath enough to rev it past 7000. Big cams are crappy to drive and beat the valvetrain harder. That's it.
A cam does not effect your bottom end. There is no cam only car making enough power to break it, and no cam is going to allow it to breath enough to rev it past 7000. Big cams are crappy to drive and beat the valvetrain harder. That's it.
Yes, thats what my impression was. How ever I want to go larger, I have driven big cam cars, and I know some people who have stock bottom end 97-99 LS1 who drive the ***** off them with decent sized cams up at 6000-6800. Can you give one reason why a LS1 wouldnt perform well with a 235/242 .621"/.592" 111+3 cam. I have read the drivability is good for how big the cam is. Or the SNS stage 2 cam. As far as I know both cams make good power under the curve.
What about the Torquer V2 232/234 .595"/.598" Cam doesnt seem that much bigger.
I want the performance part but i also want the, roudy, choppy, lopey cam sound also. I figured if im spending the money I want it to be my way.
who should I have spec me a custom one IF i go that route.
the lope is mostly overlap. you can have that with a 224r on a 112lsa. the lobe separation angle is a lot of what you hear
not sure why you keep selecting cams that are not matched to what you have.
just to clarify the above comment about cams not affecting your bottom end....they don't, not at all, but, you do want to select a cam for the rpm range your bottom end is capable of operating in
Yes, thats what my impression was. How ever I want to go larger, I have driven big cam cars, and I know some people who have stock bottom end 97-99 LS1 who drive the ***** off them with decent sized cams up at 6000-6800. Can you give one reason why a LS1 wouldnt perform well with a 235/242 .621"/.592" 111+3 cam. I have read the drivability is good for how big the cam is. Or the SNS stage 2 cam. As far as I know both cams make good power under the curve.
yes
it won't live long and you would want more head flow to take advantage of those numbers. sometimes people get lucky and get a year out of a combo like that, occasionally even more but going far above the factory redline is never good for longevity. if you're only going to 6000-6200 you're losing cylinder pressure on the lower end vs a smaller cam. i've blown up...let's see...13 engines in my life. over revving is probably tied for danger with too much boost for a given octane.
i'm suggesting how you can make a reliable combo that's quick and snappy
again, you also need to look at the other areas of the car that need to be improved for this power as well. stuff starts adding up
the 228R is a popular drop in for the c5 z06 and often ported heads. very good match with long headers and a good air filter system. usually shifted at 6500-6600
if you can afford to buy the needed parts to optimize for a larger cam and want that, by all means, go for it. but, you need better heads and that bottom end becomes a real liability. a good oil pump is also a wise investment
Chevrolet Performance Lifter Guides LS2 and newer 12595365
Delphi LS7 Lifters X12499225
Chevrolet Performance LS9 Multilayer Head Gasket 12622033
ARP Pro Series Hex Head Head Stud Kit for 1997-2003 LS engines 234-4110
BTR Cam Kit With Your Choice of Cam, Spring Kit, and Pushrods
Choose Your Spring Kit:
Titanium Spring Kit ( + $50.00)
Choose Pushrod Length:
7.400
Choose Your Cam:
BTR LS1 & LS2 N/A Stg III ( - $10.00)
I REALLY APPREIACTE all the advice I know I keeo going back and forth and you all know your stuff I hope I didnt offend/hurt feelings for trying to pick a different cam. Racebum...lol clearly you learned the way...is the 228R the biggest you would go? is there any cam safe with more overlap?
please correct me if I am wrong but your saying I can go any cam but the ones that are big that I want...dont have the compression they need so it wont make the ideal power. And the way most engines let go is the spinning them to high to make the power, in which its lacking the compression its would need.
HOONIGAN, you've been given good advice and I'd follow it. Many good components available but it's matching them up that counts the most. When building a motor you start with the best set of heads you can afford, build a bottom end, select a cam then add FAST intake and LT headers.....not exactly that simple but in that order.....
Yes, thats what my impression was. How ever I want to go larger, I have driven big cam cars, and I know some people who have stock bottom end 97-99 LS1 who drive the ***** off them with decent sized cams up at 6000-6800. Can you give one reason why a LS1 wouldnt perform well with a 235/242 .621"/.592" 111+3 cam. I have read the drivability is good for how big the cam is. Or the SNS stage 2 cam. As far as I know both cams make good power under the curve.
Do you drive around between 6000 and 7000 rpm? If so, go for it. If you use the entire band like a street car, you want something that hits low, or mid-range. 235/242 sounds like a square port head cam first off, and is way to big. It will sound awesome and be dead until 3600 rpm. The biggest I'd go on a 346 is a 230/230ish cam.
Do you drive around between 6000 and 7000 rpm? If so, go for it. If you use the entire band like a street car, you want something that hits low, or mid-range. 235/242 sounds like a square port head cam first off, and is way to big. It will sound awesome and be dead until 3600 rpm. The biggest I'd go on a 346 is a 230/230ish cam.
same
and that's with good heads and a bottom end that will stay alive at the 6500-6600 you shift at with said cam.
a 230/230 or the common 228r work wonderful on z06s with ported heads