When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It's not the heads that used different bolts it's the block. Prior to '04 some bolts were longer (155mm) and some shorter (100mm). "04 and later were equal length (100mm).
Don't go by the model year of the car! Double check!
If you are not sure what block you have measure the depth of the holes. You cant reuse TTY bolts so you could just order what came out of the block.
I installed 799 heads which are the same casting as the 243's and glad I did.
Since the '02 already has the Z06 intake all I needed was a cam and springs.
The shop I took my head to took off .007" from the deck, triple ground the valves and did a little polishing. I decided to go with a thinner head gasket for better quench and slightly higher compression. With a CIA and a tune it is a beast compared to stock.
I see you have been a member here since 1999 so you probably seen it all.
I installed 799 heads which are the same casting as the 243's and glad I did.
Since the '02 already has the Z06 intake all I needed was a cam and springs.
The shop I took my head to took off .007" from the deck, triple ground the valves and did a little polishing. I decided to go with a thinner head gasket for better quench and slightly higher compression. With a CIA and a tune it is a beast compared to stock.
I see you have been a member here since 1999 so you probably seen it all.
Same exact thing the PO did with the original LS1 engine in my '99 FRC. Milling the 243/799 heads 0.007" will remove 1cc from the chambers and using the 0.040" compressed MLS head gaskets will remove another 2.5cc compared to the 0.053" compressed GM head gasket that was stock. if the chambers were polished not sure how much material was removed. The net effect of the head swap with the milling and the gasket change means you have gone from 10.1:1 static to close to 11.1:1 static. That also really helps if you are planning a cam change as well.
Last edited by JHrinsin; Dec 27, 2017 at 09:48 AM.
Same exact thing the PO did with the original LS1 engine in my '99 FRC. Milling the 243/799 heads 0.007" will remove 1cc from the chambers and using the 0.040" compressed MLS head gaskets will remove another 2.5cc compared to the 0.053" compressed GM head gasket that was stock. if the chambers were polished not sure how much material was removed. The net effect of the head swap with the milling and the gasket change means you have gone from 10.1:1 static to close to 11.1:1 static. That also really helps if you are planning a cam change as well.
The 241 heads on a stock LS1 had ~10.1:1 static ratio.
With the smaller combustion ratio of the 243/ 799 heads the stock ratio is higher on a LS1/ 6. More like 10.6 stock and with the above mentioned mods 11.3-ish. Detonation on premium fuel shouldn't be an issue since the thinner gasket reduced quench, especially if you have a 160 deg stat.
Any how, how is your engine running?
It seems like it should add about 20 ponies reliably with a possible increase in fuel economy. The torque should increase across the entire RPM range.
Combined with the benefit of the head upgrade, cam, CIA and tune there should be over a 100Hp gain over stock.
The 241 heads on a stock LS1 had ~10.1:1 static ratio.
With the smaller combustion ratio of the 243/ 799 heads the stock ratio is higher on a LS1/ 6. More like 10.6 stock and with the above mentioned mods 11.3-ish. Detonation on premium fuel shouldn't be an issue since the thinner gasket reduced quench, especially if you have a 160 deg stat.
Any how, how is your engine running?
It seems like it should add about 20 ponies reliably with a possible increase in fuel economy. The torque should increase across the entire RPM range.
Combined with the benefit of the head upgrade, cam, CIA and tune there should be over a 100Hp gain over stock.
It made +400 rwhp ran just fine until he suffered a ring land failure (stock LS1 short block) on #7 at a track event. The current engine has a forged short block along with the same cam, heads, intake, exhaust with higher flow rated injectors. The valve reliefs in the forged pistons dropped a few tenth of a point off the static compression ratio but it still makes +400 rwhp. Just make sure you watched the spark map to keep her out of denotation (and knock sensor induced timing retard) with that much static compression and premium pump gas, as well as duty cycle on the stock injectors.
Sorry for the hijack - now back to your normal programming.
BTW, you can't go wrong with ARP head bolts as long as you get the correct ones for your block as noted by Rob 02.
Last edited by JHrinsin; Dec 27, 2017 at 11:17 AM.
My '99 FRC has a Comp 226/230 0.598"/0.610" lift 113 LSA camshaft with Comp 26926 dual springs (0.675") and trunion upgrade
stock 243 heads - GTO, not C5 Z06
LS6 intake, throttle body and de-screened MAF
LG long tube headers and C5 Z06 Ti cat back
Made 405rwhp @ 6200 RPM and 392 ft-lbs @ 4900 RPM with a conservative tune.
I need to add a thermostatically controlled oil cooler and 4-corner steam tube setup for track duty use to help protect the PO investment in the forged short block.
Last edited by JHrinsin; Dec 27, 2017 at 09:56 PM.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.