When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I was going to replace my PCV valve in my 2002 Z06 with the LS6 engine with a stock GM LS6 PCV valve. When looking into buying one, the GM LS6 PCV valve is about $100 (way over priced for a PCV valve but I like stock parts).
Looking into things further, I read that on 2004-2005 LS6 engines, GM moved the PCV valve from the external hose between the valley cover and the intake manifold to inside the valley cover itself.
The 04-05 valley cover also costs about $100. I am now thinking of changing out the now as it would give a little bit cleaner appearance under the hood.
Has anyone done this and is this as simple as it seems?
Thoughts? Opinions?
Last edited by Spaceme1117; Apr 25, 2018 at 07:42 PM.
The LS6 cover is a great mod because it eliminates much of the PCV plumbing. The later LS6 cover uses a .1 inch "fixed orifice" instead of an actual PCV valve. I installed the earlier LS6 cover back in 2004. When the external PCV hose rotted, rather than pay for the way over priced replacement hose, I bought the hose for the latter valley cover, which cost only a few dollars. I drilled a .1 inch hole in a short piece of metal rod, and placed it inside the hose, thus converting to a fixed orifice type of PCV system. Works great.
Last edited by fmvette9; Apr 29, 2018 at 10:32 AM.
I was going to replace my PCV valve in my 2002 Z06 with the LS6 engine with a stock GM LS6 PCV valve. When looking into buying one, the GM LS6 PCV valve is about $100 (way over priced for a PCV valve but I like stock parts).
Looking into things further, I read that on 2004-2005 LS6 engines, GM moved the PCV valve from the external hose between the valley cover and the intake manifold to inside the valley cover itself.
The 04-05 valley cover also costs about $100. I am now thinking of changing out the now as it would give a little bit cleaner appearance under the hood.
Has anyone done this and is this as simple as it seems?
Thoughts? Opinions?
I did this change on my 2000 FRC installing to 2004 valley cover. On my LS1 block I had to remove a small piece of the block so the new valley cover would fit. Other than that the mod has worked well and I am happy with the results. Here's a link to a How to for it from LS1Howto. http://www.ls1howto.com/index.php?article=18
I would not bother with updating the valley cover and the required mods to go the LS6 route. I would go with a Mighty catch can that uses both valve covers
Do the pcv valves in the later 04 models (the ones under the valley cover) go bad? Heck of a location to put them as the labor to get to it for such a small, usually cheap, part is crazy.
Last edited by imgn tht; Apr 26, 2018 at 01:46 PM.
Do the pcv valves in the later 04 models (the ones under the valley cover) go bad? Heck of a location to put them as the labor to get to it for such a small, usually cheap, part is crazy.
There is nothing to go "bad" as it is simply a fixed size hole rather than an actual valve. Worst case scenario is that it gets clogged somehow.
So I was pondering the pcv restrictor vs pcv valve thing the other day. Typically a pcv valve is basically a one way check valve, so it doesn't let air flow backwards into the crankcase. For NA applications, that's not a big deal because you normally have vacuum in the intake. But for forced induction guys, a pcv restrictor would be an issue right? That doesn't really affect me as I'm NA, but just curious.
My other thought was regarding the flow capacity of the pcv restrictor. If it uses a 0.1" fixed orifice, can that flow enough? Perhaps for a stock application, but what about applications that inherently have more crankcase pressure?
I just installed the 04+ LS6 valley cover on my motor (just finished the rebuild), and I'm running it with an Elite Engineering catch can. No issues at the moment, but I only drove the car for the first time last night, so it's too early to make any determinations.
I would not bother with updating the valley cover and the required mods to go the LS6 route. I would go with a Mighty catch can that uses both valve covers
I have an Elite Engineering catch can. My car has 97K miles and I wanted to replace the PCV valve just in case but I figured since the price would be the same to just change out the valley cover.
It is more work but will clean up the hoses a little bit and any excuse to turn a wrench on my car is a good thing.
So I was pondering the pcv restrictor vs pcv valve thing the other day. Typically a pcv valve is basically a one way check valve, so it doesn't let air flow backwards into the crankcase. For NA applications, that's not a big deal because you normally have vacuum in the intake. But for forced induction guys, a pcv restrictor would be an issue right? That doesn't really affect me as I'm NA, but just curious.
A lot of PCV valves for NA cars don't actually seal 100%. It's really just designed to be a metering device, and while it only flows well in one direction, it doesn't seal completely and won't prevent boost from leaking into the crankcase. PCV valves for factory forced induction cars are typically designed to seal completely. Yes, with the fixed orifice "restrictor" PCV and forced induction, a one-way check valve must be added to prevent a boost leak into the crankcase.
My other thought was regarding the flow capacity of the pcv restrictor. If it uses a 0.1" fixed orifice, can that flow enough? Perhaps for a stock application, but what about applications that inherently have more crankcase pressure?
On a forced induction engine in boost, the PCV valve stops flowing and crankcase pressure is vented out the breathers (where fresh air would normally enter the crankcase when not in boost).