Do I need a diff brace?





Before I finally decided on the 4.10 gears, I was considering an H/C/I build targeting ~470rwhp, but decided against it. However, during that time, I found a PFADT differential brace for sale and bought it as I stocked up on parts.
Would the car benefit by my installing it? I know most guys install them to cure wheel hop and as their mods cross the 450rwhp mark, but my car is mostly stock as far as HP goes, so I wonder if it serves any purpose to install the PFADT? I don't think it'd help save the differential whatsoever, but I thought I'd ask them who'd know.
Thanks, Guys!
I'd install one if it was in my possession.






It won't hurt to have it on and with 4.10 gears you have increased the likelihood that you might get some wheel hop.
And, who knows, you might get the crazies one day and take it to the strip.





When you have enough traction the differential ring gear and the pinion try to push apart. The brace helps the cases resist that force.
If you are experiencing wheel hop, you need to address the following things to help prevent it:
- Better tires
- Better differential mount
- Better engine mounts
- Better shocks
After all of that, you can still have some drivetrain shake/wheel hop but it will be more controlled..
Once you get all the traction that you can, no wheel hop, your next week link is the weak C5 parts in the differential. (output shafts, belieview springs and clutches.





My brace looks like this:
Duh. I'm sorry for the error. And thanks again for all ya'lls advice!
So... the question again... do you think the car would benefit if I installed this yoke? I don't ever remember ever experiencing any wheel hop when I've hammered it.
Thanks again!
Last edited by dork; Sep 18, 2018 at 06:10 PM.
When you have enough traction the differential ring gear and the pinion try to push apart. The brace helps the cases resist that force.
If you are experiencing wheel hop, you need to address the following things to help prevent it:
- Better tires
- Better differential mount
- Better engine mounts
- Better shocks
After all of that, you can still have some drivetrain shake/wheel hop but it will be more controlled..
Once you get all the traction that you can, no wheel hop, your next week link is the weak C5 parts in the differential. (output shafts, belieview springs and clutches.
should fix you up right......
The light weight flywheel is a NO NO in any street driven car in my opinion for a few reasons.
The brace sound nice, but after you listen to it rattle against your exhaust for a few thousand miles... you'll want to kill yourself.

Unless you simply WHEEL HOP or HAMMER your car to death (both of those reasons cause the same problems) you should have no reason to
install a diff brace or rigid mounts.
Chuck CoW
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
should fix you up right......
The light weight flywheel is a NO NO in any street driven car in my opinion for a few reasons.
The brace sound nice, but after you listen to it rattle against your exhaust for a few thousand miles... you'll want to kill yourself.

Unless you simply WHEEL HOP or HAMMER your car to death (both of those reasons cause the same problems) you should have no reason to
install a diff brace or rigid mounts.
Chuck CoW
I run a Fidanza in my C5 Street car and love it in comparison to the stock feel with my build. However I changed the clutch to a Centerforce at the same time so hard to compare what the difference in driveability would have been with just a flywheel change. My brother runs a stock clutch and flywheel in his car and I hate it. Yet he drives mine and hates mine.
Is your perspective based on the way it engages/drives or mechanical?
I run a Fidanza in my C5 Street car and love it in comparison to the stock feel with my build. However I changed the clutch to a Centerforce at the same time so hard to compare what the difference in driveability would have been with just a flywheel change. My brother runs a stock clutch and flywheel in his car and I hate it. Yet he drives mine and hates mine.
Is your perspective based on the way it engages/drives or mechanical?
The engine NEEDS the MASS to perform well.... Most people (especially me) hate aluminum flywheels because starting off and launching usually suffers.....alot.
Rotating MASS (flywheel & clutch) are necessary to overcome the "moment of inertia" or transition from stationary to moving.... The heavier the mass, the easier it is to transmit that
energy to the vehicle to make it start to move.... When the flywheels get lighter (even only a few pounds...) a huge amount of the energy required to get the vehicle moving quick... IS LOST.
Once you get that mass moving....It likes to stay MOVING.... Aluminum can rev quick.... but with no torque behind it and with a load on it.... usually falls flat.
Aluminum flywheels are marketed under the premise that lighter revs faster and is somehow better..... If you own a car with license plates that drives on a public road... and has an aluminum flywheel....
You know how your clutch suffers and what a drag it is to drive on the street.
There is absolutely NO REASON anyone should have an aluminum flywheel on a street car. A comparable steel and or HEAVY flywheel will always perform better than aluminum.
Cars that benefit from aluminum flywheels are for instance..... NASCAR vehicles that operate in the 8,9, & 10,000 rpm zone and never go below 4,000 rpm.
If you're not a NASCAR driver, then aluminum flywheels are not for you.
A lesson I learned at 19 years old was building my first SERIOUS small block for my 1968 vette. I had a 7,000 rpm small block, high compression, Nascar heads, and a huge roller cam.
In addition, I had a 3.36 (wow, that sounds scary.. he he) rear end........... With a Doug Nash 4+1 5 speed. 3.27 first gear.... 1:1 5th.
At first, the 3.27 does not sound too intimidating.... until you do the math and discover that my first gear was (as if I had a 4 speed in the car.....). 5.15:1 rear end ratio....

That all sound fun, but going against every bit of advice HOT ROD magazine and the local experts had to give.... I built the motor with a giant THICK 8" iron balancer and a
billet steel explosion-proof flywheel......and had it balanced. Everyone said it would never work......
That was likely the most fun car I ever drove and I owe much of it to the rear end/nash combination..... and the VERY HEAVY rotating mass of the hi-revving 350 engine
which was unstoppable and left the line with the wheels in the air every time..... As if it was a big block..... But it wasn't.
It's a lesson I learned young.....and will never forget. Every car that ever came into my shop with an aluminum flywheel... drove like a loser.... especially off the line.
I think there was maybe 1 or 2 special case exceptions... and they were very over built cars.... which most people are not driving.
DO NOT USE ALUMINUM FLYWHEELS on the street..... They are for RACE CARS ONLY.
Trust me.
Chuck CoW
Last edited by Chuck CoW; Jan 29, 2019 at 11:10 PM.





To Chuck's advice about Lwt flywheels... I don't have any background to argue the point. However, I never ever launch from a stop. I bought it because I wanted it for highway passing. Dunno how a heavier flywheel would have worked and since the swap came at the same time as the 4.10s, I don't know how much difference there would have been, but I'm completely happy with the Lwt flywheel setup. In 5th gear the response is quite decent, and down-shifting into 4th to use the hammer with this combo is completely satisfying. 3rd -> 4th -> 5th WOT seems pretty strong, to me, too for no H/C/I mods. I dunno if an OEM flywheel can do better.
I have a Japanese friend whose English isn't fluent (but his Japanese is). He rode in the car before and after. When I WOT'd it in 2nd and rowed through the gears to 95 on the on ramp, he yelled, "GOBO NU KI !!" with exhilaration. He had to explain it to me... It's a word that has no English equivalent that I can think of; it means 'the power to pass several competitors all at once during a race'. (actually... the power to pull a burdock* out of the ground--*like a BIG carrot) I just wish the word would fit on a license plate...
Rotating MASS (flywheel & clutch) are necessary to overcome the "moment of inertia" or transition from stationary to moving.... The heavier the mass, the easier it is to transmit that
energy to the vehicle to make it start to move.... When the flywheels get lighter (even only a few pounds...) a huge amount of the energy required to get the vehicle moving quick... IS LOST.
Once you get that mass moving....It likes to stay MOVING.... Aluminum can rev quick.... but with no torque behind it and with a load on it.... usually falls flat.
Aluminum flywheels are marketed under the premise that lighter revs faster and is somehow better..... If you own a car with license plates that drives on a public road... and has an aluminum flywheel....
You know how your clutch suffers and what a drag it is to drive on the street.
There is absolutely NO REASON anyone should have an aluminum flywheel on a street car. A comparable steel and or HEAVY flywheel will always perform better than aluminum.
Cars that benefit from aluminum flywheels are for instance..... NASCAR vehicles that operate in the 8,9, & 10,000 rpm zone and never go below 4,000 rpm.
If you're not a NASCAR driver, then aluminum flywheels are not for you.
A lesson I learned at 19 years old was building my first SERIOUS small block for my 1968 vette. I had a 7,000 rpm small block, high compression, Nascar heads, and a huge roller cam.
In addition, I had a 3.36 (wow, that sounds scary.. he he) rear end........... With a Doug Nash 4+1 5 speed. 3.27 first gear.... 1:1 5th.
At first, the 3.27 does not sound too intimidating.... until you do the math and discover that my first gear was (as if I had a 4 speed in the car.....). 5.15:1 rear end ratio....

That all sound fun, but going against every bit of advice HOT ROD magazine and the local experts had to give.... I built the motor with a giant THICK 8" iron balancer and a
billet steel explosion-proof flywheel......and had it balanced. Everyone said it would never work......
That was likely the most fun car I ever drove and I owe much of it to the rear end/nash combination..... and the VERY HEAVY rotating mass of the hi-revving 350 engine
which was unstoppable and left the line with the wheels in the air every time..... As if it was a big block..... But it wasn't.
It's a lesson I learned young.....and will never forget. Every car that ever came into my shop with an aluminum flywheel... drove like a loser.... especially off the line.
I think there was maybe 1 or 2 special case exceptions... and they were very over built cars.... which most people are not driving.
DO NOT USE ALUMINUM FLYWHEELS on the street..... They are for RACE CARS ONLY.
Trust me.
Chuck CoW








