Typical cam/head setup
What LSA should I aim for (more chop = better)?
Also, how do I determine what the valve to piston clearance will be? What is the minimum I should accept? Is there room to factor in carbon deposit?
What LSA should I aim for (more chop = better)?
Also, how do I determine what the valve to piston clearance will be? What is the minimum I should accept? Is there room to factor in carbon deposit?
LESS LSA = more chop. 110 is probably the lowest you'll find, and that's some serious chop...the cam you referenced in your initial post had a 110 LSA. 112 is a bit more of a balance, most cams in the duration we're recommending are 113+
LSA does more than just add chop, it also shifts the power band. Less LSA means a lower power band. It's why a lot of the "smaller" cams run higher LSA because the less duration keeps the powerband lower. BIG cams usually run low LSA to shift the power band down to be more attainable. I don't think you'd want to go lower than 112 LSA with a cam below 230 duration.
Duration is what determines PTV clearance. Under 230 and you won't have to worry about it with stock heads. Significantly over that, or seriously milled heads, and you'll need to check...and the only way to check is pop the heads off.
LSA does more than just add chop, it also shifts the power band. Less LSA means a lower power band. It's why a lot of the "smaller" cams run higher LSA because the less duration keeps the powerband lower. BIG cams usually run low LSA to shift the power band down to be more attainable. I don't think you'd want to go lower than 112 LSA with a cam below 230 duration.
For the duration, ok, somewhere around 228/230, .600@ .050 lift. Can I keep the stock rockers?
Ignoring the want for the chop, what would be the ideal LSA for my application?
With the trans am engine I had, I've been told that I should have gotten a higher compression to maximise the benefits of the cam. Do I end up not having an optimal cylinder pressure with a 228/230 cam or just pulling up a bit more timing advance will make up for it?
As a bonus question, if I want to move up the redline, is the limit in the valvetrain or in the bottom end? (Both?)
Last edited by NoradIV; Jul 18, 2019 at 01:08 PM.
For the duration, ok, somewhere around 228/230, .600@ .050 lift. Can I keep the stock rockers?
Ignoring the want for the chop, what would be the ideal LSA for my application?
With the trans am engine I had, I've been told that I should have gotten a higher compression to maximise the benefits of the cam. Do I end up not having an optimal cylinder pressure with a 228/230 cam or just pulling up a bit more timing advance will make up for it?
As a bonus question, if I want to move up the redline, is the limit in the valvetrain or in the bottom end? (Both?)
Thank you, I'll read the whole thing tonight.
I'd say ideal LSA for the cams you're looking at is 112-114.
More compression is always good...but it's a balance. More compression means higher octane fuel, etc. You'll certainly gain more power with more compression, but is it necessary for the cam to perform at it's best? No. HEADS I think are far more important.
How high are you looking to rev the engine? Valve train stability is the biggest thing, but the bottom end plays a part absolutely. Mine revs to 7k without issue (I have the limiter set at 6,850 because it feels "safer" to me and that's just past peak power at 6,700). Appropriately matched springs to the cam are what matters...and you'd want it all to be as light as possible. Stock rockers are fine BUT you'll want to upgrade the trunnion bearings. Many upgrade to brass bushings (myself included).
More compression is always good...but it's a balance. More compression means higher octane fuel, etc. You'll certainly gain more power with more compression, but is it necessary for the cam to perform at it's best? No. HEADS I think are far more important.
Heads will happen when I redo the entire engine at a later time.
How fast do I want to spin it? I'd love to go all the way up to 8000 RPM, but that won't happen with this engine. That is why I want to do a full build at some point in the future.
Basically, I am going after 2 things here, and it is probably my mistake. More power by moving the RPM band up a bit and getting a different engine "personality". I've always lusted after a choppy, high RPM screamer NASCAR style V8 for a maximum amount of bald eagles.
If I have to make a choice, power and reliability will take precedence over everything else.
Last edited by NoradIV; Jul 18, 2019 at 02:13 PM.
What LSA should I aim for (more chop = better)?
Also, how do I determine what the valve to piston clearance will be? What is the minimum I should accept? Is there room to factor in carbon deposit?
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Playing with this calculator might help:
https://mgispeedware.com/camshaft-calculator/
More overlap = rowdier idle, and more power (all other things being equal). I read a fairly well-respected tuner says that you can up to about 7 degrees of overlap in a street car (at 5.7 liters) before driveability starts to become a problem. I went with 9, and I suspect he's right.
It's lurchy in first gear up to about 1500 RPM. Totally smooth in higher gears though. 232/234 @ 112, +4. But it's lots of fun on the track so I'm not complaining. Idle is pretty tame, but I've heard lopey idles from the same cam so I think the tune has a lot to do with it.
The main reason I want to do this is strictly because I miss having a mean idle. I just don't want to have an engine that perform worse or have a significantly worse gas mileage as I drive this thing quite often.
I will eventually do a better engine build, but I have chassis and brake upgrades to do first.
https://mgispeedware.com/camshaft-calculator/
It's lurchy in first gear up to about 1500 RPM. Totally smooth in higher gears though. 232/234 @ 112, +4. But it's lots of fun on the track so I'm not complaining. Idle is pretty tame, but I've heard lopey idles from the same cam so I think the tune has a lot to do with it.PCM Hammer only works with the 411 / P01 PCMs (which are in your 2002 and mine as well), but P59 support is in the works (2003-2004) and LS Droid does P59s already.
There's no free data logger yet, which is a rather glaring omission, but I hope to change that in a few months.





A used cam which I believe would be a solid choice for your goals. Disclaimer, I don't know the seller.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/market/1924321
PCM Hammer only works with the 411 / P01 PCMs (which are in your 2002 and mine as well), but P59 support is in the works (2003-2004) and LS Droid does P59s already.
There's no free data logger yet, which is a rather glaring omission, but I hope to change that in a few months.
I'll take a look at it. Thanks!







