Need New Engine - Crate Engines (?) - 2001 Base
LS1/6 engines have a siamese 3.898 bore, you're really not supposed to take them beyond .005 over. That one is either .020 or .030 over depending on where you read (differing numbers is allready a red flag). On some Gen III's you can get away with that, but not all. You won't know if this one was "ok" until the block shows up... good luck returning it.
I'd give a call to Thompson Motorsports. When I last spoke with them, they had a couple of Gen III aluminum cores floating around they could build. They DO ship to California now, but you have to sign a waiver that says it's not for a street vehicle. https://thompsonmotorsports.net/coll...remanufactured
What do you think of the iron block? I think I'm just assuming all will be well since these sellers have 99% positive feedback over thousands of sales.
Having had a previous career at a shop that built engines (amongst other things) I have a little more empathy for GM's warranty dept. Frankly the average consumer can be pretty dishonest and does amazingly stupid things mechanically. If someone makes a mistake that frags a $10K motor, they are looking for someone to blame/foot the bill. Most don't really care who they have to lie to for that to happen.
We got to the point that with some builds were were using UV activated ink to draw over bolts so we'd know if someone opened up a project and messed with it. There were some interesting conversations with broken cars where we could see someone had gone into something a messed with it.
I remember one guy who accidentally pushed a car into 1st gear instead of 3rd at WOT on the straight at Laguna Seca. The mechanical overrev was so violent it shoved a pushrod 3" through a SS shaft rocker arm. Guess who was at the shop demanding an engine warranty the next day... God himself couldn't build an engine that would have survived such a mistake.
https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/br...provements-act
Basically says that a company cannot blanket void a warranty on services unrelated systems. IE if you change headlights and the transmission blows out, GM has to honor your transmission warranty.
If you truly just changed valve springs, and a ring land cracked or similar, you have legal recourse
1. Burden of Proof – Aftermarket Parts
- Citation: 15 U.S.C. § 2302(c) (“No warrantor of a consumer product may condition his written or implied warranty... on the consumer’s using, in connection with such product, any article or service (other than an article or service provided without charge under the terms of the warranty) which is identified by brand, trade, or corporate name.”)
- Meaning: GM can’t deny coverage simply because you used aftermarket valve springs. They must prove the part actually caused the damage before they can deny coverage.
2. Prohibition on Tie-In Sales
- Citation: 15 U.S.C. § 2302(c) (same as above).
- Meaning: GM can’t require that you use only GM parts or GM service centers to keep your warranty valid, unless those parts/services are provided free. This is the “anti–tie-in sales” provision.
3. Good Faith / Clear Disclosure Requirements
- Citation:
- 15 U.S.C. § 2302(a): Requires warranties to be written in “simple and readily understood language.”
- 15 U.S.C. § 2304(a): For “full” warranties, the warrantor must remedy defects within a reasonable time and without charge.
- 15 U.S.C. § 2302(a): Requires warranties to be written in “simple and readily understood language.”
- Meaning: Denying coverage after forcing you into unnecessary diagnostics, if unrelated to the failure, may violate these requirements because the warranty must be honored fairly and transparently.
4. Remedies Available
- Small Claims Court
- Citation: 15 U.S.C. § 2310(d)(1)(A): “A consumer who is damaged by the failure of a supplier, warrantor, or service contractor to comply… may bring suit for damages and other legal and equitable relief.”
- Citation: 15 U.S.C. § 2310(d)(1)(A)–(D) clarifies that suit may be brought in “any court of competent jurisdiction in any State,” which includes Magistrate (small claims) courts.
- Citation: 15 U.S.C. § 2310(d)(1)(A): “A consumer who is damaged by the failure of a supplier, warrantor, or service contractor to comply… may bring suit for damages and other legal and equitable relief.”
- Attorney’s Fees
- Citation: 15 U.S.C. § 2310(d)(2): “If a consumer finally prevails… he may be allowed by the court to recover as part of the judgment a sum equal to the aggregate amount of cost and expenses (including attorneys’ fees…).”
- Citation: 15 U.S.C. § 2310(d)(2): “If a consumer finally prevails… he may be allowed by the court to recover as part of the judgment a sum equal to the aggregate amount of cost and expenses (including attorneys’ fees…).”
- State Law Overlay
- Citation: 15 U.S.C. § 2311(b)(1): The Act does not “invalidate or restrict any right or remedy of any consumer under State law or any other Federal law.”
- Meaning: You can pursue Georgia warranty/consumer law claims alongside Magnuson-Moss.
- Citation: 15 U.S.C. § 2311(b)(1): The Act does not “invalidate or restrict any right or remedy of any consumer under State law or any other Federal law.”
5. Your Leverage
- Burden of proof: GM cannot just point to the aftermarket springs — they must prove causation under § 2302(c).
- Escalation options: You can invoke § 2310(d)(1) for a private right of action, and § 2310(d)(2) for attorneys’ fees (if outside small claims).
- Combined strategy: Federal law + Georgia state law gives you multiple legal hooks.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts





Shop wants to put existing LS1 oil pan on the crate LS3.
Is there any reason to do that?
With internal engine damage on the LS1, it's possible that the oil pan is damaged and the shop says they will source an aftermarket pan in that case. What is different between LS1 Corvette pan and an LS3 crate pan?





2 piece C5 pans are fetching decent money. So, if they swap the pan be sure to get it.







