FLP header dyno results
Hi Cam,
I agree with you and I think Jon has done a very good thing. I just wanted to point out that the 10rwhp from LS1edit is another test, and therefore, cannot be claimed by the header install, since the same 10rwhp probably could have been attained even before the header install with LS1 edit.
I was just trying to point out that it should not have been included in the header install.
The reason I point this out is that Jon (jmx) have discussed an install article on the installation of my LG Long Tubes. If he does this, then my headers will not start from the same 10hp lower baseline, but rather they will start from the new higher baseline. That would be an LS1edit tuned C5.
Your point about the tuners doing the dyno runs is valid, except when I did them, along with Katech, and others, our numbers were deemed "skewed" because of a conflict of interest. And in many cases that does happen, but not at LGM.
In addition, if my sales are going to be affected by a test, It is my duty to see that the test is correct. And to tune a car after a part change, rather than before, does indeed skew the results.
Thanks
Lou G
I know this is on the edge of "political correctness", but I would say that you would have gotten 10rwhp from LS1edit tuning with or without the headers, and by doing the tuning after the header install, is being slightly misleading.
i dont think jmX was misleading whole heartedly... i can see your point though, based on the TITLE of his thread, and then posting his FINAL results.
unlike others who claimed less peak value gains with before and after results on your headers...
from his graph, he looked like he gained atleast 20rwhp and 30 rwtq, just from the FLPs BEFORE tuning in the heart of his powerband ....
[Modified by johnnyC5, 11:43 PM 3/4/2003]
The real test is how the car with FLPs and tuning compares to the car with LG's and tuning, and that test will still show which headers make the most power, and what RPM's. The comparison against untuned-stock manifolds is a bit less important, most people wanna know how LG stacks up against the competition more than how much it stacks up against the stock stuff.
BTW, the FLP ground clearance is pretty bad due to the V-clamps. If I do go with another set of headers ground clearance differences will be something I report on. Its a big issue with my car, and ranks up there in importance. Maybe the new LG headers without vclamps will have more clearance, I dunno.
I'd be more interested in comparing numbers after tuning is done specifically for the LGM headers, though. When I put my Stainless Works headers on, my A/F ratio dropped to about 11.5:1, before I got tuning done. IMHO, the car should be properly tuned before and after a mod is installed, to see how much a mod is worth. Otherwise you'll get things like changing an air filter cause an increase in HP, just because the car was too rich before and the filter makes it run leaner.
Great numbers though :thumbs:
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
That leaves LG and FLP. Both are self installable without the need for cutting or welding. I can pull my car in, get out a few sockets and a wrench, and drive out a few hours later with no professional help or welding needed. BIG PLUS imo, and offsets the cost since you dont have to pay for labor.
So, between FLP and LG, the FLP's right now have the best ground clearance (by a little bit), but the new LG's coming out very soon may fix that issue totally by using a different style connection, which would be great as it'd lower the cost while increasing the ground clearance. We shall see. :)
for do-it-yourselfers, i agree with you.... TTS are not "user-friendly" as the FLPs or LGs.
should be interesting to see what the new LGs will be like, in terms of clearance, power, quality.... and .... PRICE
hi Lou :seeya :D









