When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
My guess is simple, reliable, cost effective simplicity. If it rides well and capable of 1g skidpad it is good enough right? Corvette has used the monoleaf for a long time. I would love coil overs stock but am sure it would raise the price..
Re: Why do vettes have leaf springs? (Mike Mercury)
Look at it this way. The Z06 is a world-class supercar, and it uses fiberglass transverse leaf springs. The Z06 is a world class supercar, and it uses two-valves-per-cylinder, cam-in-block technology.
It works. It's 2/3 the cost of the next best car out there.
Besides, if they made it perfect, modders wouldn't like them. :lol:
Well, if it had to do with cost you'd think the camaro platform would use it too, but instead the camaro has coil overs stock, just like lots of CHEAP cars.
I personally dont think its an issue of cost, I think its how they designed the suspension and I think it works great.
I don't know why Vettes still do have leaf springs, though I admit they work, they can be a source of bump steer on curves. Hopefully they will have optional coil overs someday in the future, particularly since composite coils are slowly becoming available saving weight and giving the ultimate in adjustability.
Camaro's use struts and coils in the rear not 1/2 as good as true coil overs. The leaf does keep spring weight down, CG and other smart people handling thingys :crazy: KISS engineering eh' :lol:
I'm not too knowledgable on 'vette history, but I figured it was a historical thing. Don't All Corvettes use leaf springs?
Only C4s and C5s. C2s and C3s use coil springs for the front with a metal leaf (switched to fiberglass in 81, I think) in the rear. It's cheap, saves space, and seems to work pretty well. :cheers:
In his book "Corvette From The Inside", Dave McClellan states that the fiberglass leafspring introduced in 1981 provided the greatest single weight savings design change during his career at Chevy (7lbs. vs. 48lbs.). The fiberglass spring was immune to corrosion and provided 10 times the design life over steel springs. The steel springs were designed to pass a life cycle test of 200,000 full deflection cycles. The fiberglass springs could pass 2 million test cycles. For the C4 the front leafspring was also used because of weight considerations.
Re: Why do vettes have leaf springs? (Mike Mercury)
If it rides well and capable of 1g skidpad it is good enough right?
I'm sorry; that's not good enough.
:)
Sure it is, what's is wrong with a leaf spring, about the only advantage of coil overs is adjustability. Someone mentioned two valves per cylinder implying, I think, that the cars are low tech but work. They are NOT low tech. In the '30s Dusenburgs had double overhead cams, 4 valves per, and a supercharger is that high tech? In the day it was, our vette has some wonderful engineering it. Valve and cam placement and spring design do not decide if something is low or high tech. Rant over.
Well said CPT Z06 :yesnod: . When I had the cobra the ricer crowd still didn't like it, but they "respected" it because it was faster, and becuase it was a DOHC w/ 32 valves. Thus, it was "high-tech" like their four bangers. Because of modern vehicle marketing, most people don't know that multiple overhead cams and superchargers etc. are old-school also. Car manufacturers market certain things as high-tech to differentiate their product. Ever read a comparo between a boxter S and a vette (the local porshe dealer gave it to me when they were trying to get me buy one, I never even considered it, but got a sweet test drive) their all over how high-tech thier engine is, and how the vette engine is low low tech, something a Neandertal would drive :lol: .
From what I've heard the leaf springs are much lighter, and reduce unsprung weight; they're just not adjustable, but neigher are the systems that come on mustangs and camaros, they're not true coil-overs, you have to change springs with them too. :cheers:
And most people when they go to coil overs and then rave about how well the car handles, is because they went up in spring rate, you can do the same thing by getting stiffer leaf springs. Not sure which one is cheaper though?
I don't know, but I hate them, cause they are rubbing the insides of my wheels!!! :mad :mad :mad I guess I have to raise mine back up, and grind on the ends of the springs alittle till the rubbing goes away.