When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The fly-by-wire throttle of the vette is cool, but what is its value over a cable throttle? The FBW system is much more expensive. It apparently has its own computer. It requires the rheostat at the pedal, its own wiring, a stepper motor at the throttle body. What is the benefit of all this complication?
Elimination of additional cables for traction control systems and well as idle air control valve. You also eliminate cruise control hardware. Cruise control hardware and cables.
Not only does that simply the system, it also saves a lot of space and quite a bit of weight!
Elimination of additional cables for traction control systems and well as idle air control valve. You also eliminate cruise control hardware. Cruise control hardware and cables.
Not only does that simply the system, it also saves a lot of space and quite a bit of weight!
Agree with everything except "elimination of additional cables for traction control systems." I honestly cannot think of any cables that have been used for traction control (or ABS). GM traction control systems have been controlled by the EBTCM (Electronic Brake Traction Control Module), along with input and assist from the PCM for many years. (PCM is responsible for turning off injectors and/or spark to cut engine power while the EBTCM controls the brake modulator that pulses the brakes to control anti-lock braking and/or traction control.)
It is also cheaper and more trouble free than the cable system, for normal driving and for cruise operation. Many of GM cars are going this way. Wait till the Corvette gets electronic steering...Saturn currently uses it in the VUE and the ION.
Yeah, I know the ASR in my 98 T/A for throttle control traction control is accent compared to my 99 C5's drive by wire. ;)
(Yes, on the F-bodies, the throttle cable, cruise cable all run to an ASR motor and then one seperate cable from the ASR motor runs to the throttle body.)
I think this question fits here-I've noticed when slowing down in gear (mn6) that the rate of deceleration changes. At first it is nornal then it feels as though the car is free-wheeling. I assume the throttle body opens slightly for some reason(polution control?) but no fuel is fed to the engine. Has anyone else noticed this? It's annoying but not a big deal. :confused:
They have done that for years so emissions could be cut down. My 86 used to do it and it had the old throttle cable.
The C4 ASR included a push back on the pedal. With the FBW the computer can just cut the throttle motor. Overall I can guarantee you that it is cheaper to it this way than the old way. If it wasn't they would not have done it. It also allows the computer to maintain better control over engine operating conditions and still meet the drivers demands.
I just can't accept fly-by-wire steering. Do they have a force feedback system to simulate the bumps in the road. :nonod:
[Modified by split63, 7:32 PM 8/4/2003]
C5's dont have fly by wire steering or brakes. It is conventional rack and pinion.
Steering does have a magnet that stiffens up the feel at speed.
Eric, read what that guy was replying to. The guy above said that in Saturns they are using Electronic steering, just wait till Vettes get it. He wasnt saying C5s had it.....
The fly-by-wire throttle of the vette is cool, but what is its value over a cable throttle? ..... It apparently has its own computer. .....
The computer is the Powertrain Control Module (PCM). It is the PCM that controls the air/fuel meetering system (fuel injectors, ignition, Knock Sensor system, emissions systems, etc) for driveability, fuel economy and emissions.
A mechanical cable system would be a needless complication for the PCM. The PCM makes rapid lean/rich transitions (monitored by HO2S) when in Closed Loop operation. Computer control is the way GM chose to get the driveability, performance, and fuel economy we enjoy with the C5. The throttle input has to become an electronic signal at some point, easiest to do it at the accelerator pedal.
If you guys want to see drive by wire, variable valve train and motor mounted PCM, check out the engine bay of a Trailblazer or Envoy with the I6 engine. It's amazing how little of everything their is, especially bulk wiring. No traction control modules, no cruise models, no coils or wires (coil on plug instead), etc... etc.. Actally there is just plastic all over the place covering stuff up.
Drive by wire is here to stay, electric steering and brakes will be interesting.
The electronic steering I'm talking about is the power assist, and it is standard on the Saturn VUE and ION. Sorry to mislead everyone. Instead of having a hydraulic PS pump, there is an electric motor mounted to the steering column that provides power assist. The computer can be programmed to add/subtract resistance to the steering. The computer also allows for more assist at low speeds, while removing assist at high speeds.
Then, there is electronic variable timing, and I don't mean the VTEC system that Honda utilizes. The Honda system controls a solenoid that when open allows a greater oil flow through the rockers, which allows two (per cylinder) rockers to lock onto a third rocker, thus increasing the lift. The electronic system I'm talking about controls each valve individually and electronically. (More programming for the aftermarket to play around with.)
The electronic age is with us...
Read how magnasteer on the Vette works and you will realize how close you are to drive by wire steering on the C5. A couple of modules and two electric motors and it will be there
Bill
Wait a minute! By now, we were supposed to be traveling
around in personal flying cars with no traffic jams.
Well, according to Popular Mechanics anyway. :D