When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I was reading the post of a fellow modoholic and I am tossed between headers or cam first. If I remember correctly some one on here posted a tr220 cam I think that put out 40 hp from a cam only install versus headers
being in the vacinity of 20 to35 tops. Dollar for dollar the cam seems like the better choice for 1000.00 or less complete with install(maybe a little over) where as a good quality header at this reading is 9xx.xx not including install.
Any input on this and why you choosed the one you did???? see sig . car is still relatively stock.
problem with cam and stock exhaust manifold is cam will not perform up to expectation...expect only about 20rwhp from cam without headers...but when you do add the LT headers then get hp from cam plus the lost hp from cam running thru stock exhaust....
Headers will accent all mods you do in the future ( no matter weather you go N/A or superchargered, Nitrous, etc..) A cam depends on weather you have heads, What stage, compression, N/A, Superchargerd, etc.....
So I would say do headers first, Do cam WITH the heads unless you only plan to do the headers and cam :party:
problem with cam and stock exhaust manifold is cam will not perform up to expectation...expect only about 20rwhp from cam without headers...but when you do add the LT headers then get hp from cam plus the lost hp from cam running thru stock exhaust....
problem with cam and stock exhaust manifold is cam will not perform up to expectation...expect only about 20rwhp from cam without headers...but when you do add the LT headers then get hp from cam plus the lost hp from cam running thru stock exhaust.... :iagree:
I say it depends on what you want to do. If you are really looking to get as much horsepower as possible or you want to run it at the strip, then you will have to do both eventually. If you just want a little more kick in your seat than do the cam. Dollar for dollar its better. I have talked to many people that did a 220 cam only and got 40rwhp with a tune. I have yet to see any headers put that sort of power out. Personally I feel better spending the money on the cam. $1500 on pieces of metal is absurd. It should tell you something that a cam plus install, which requires you to get into the engine, costs the same as a set of headers, not installed.
I would go with a cam first if you plan on doing headers in the future. If you are only planning one or two mods then I would do the headers and leave the motor alone. A cam makes the car sound so much better. Good luck with your decision. Kaley
I say it depends on what you want to do. If you are really looking to get as much horsepower as possible or you want to run it at the strip, then you will have to do both eventually. If you just want a little more kick in your seat than do the cam. Dollar for dollar its better. I have talked to many people that did a 220 cam only and got 40rwhp with a tune. I have yet to see any headers put that sort of power out. Personally I feel better spending the money on the cam. $1500 on pieces of metal is absurd. It should tell you something that a cam plus install, which requires you to get into the engine, costs the same as a set of headers, not installed.
problem with cam and stock exhaust manifold is cam will not perform up to expectation...expect only about 20rwhp from cam without headers...but when you do add the LT headers then get hp from cam plus the lost hp from cam running thru stock exhaust....
Thanks fellows !!!! I know headers would only enhance the cam but dollar for dollar the cam still wins.And it's a given that eventually I would install headers and do cam first but either way you look at it they would enhance each other :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: Btw the tr220 would that be too much with the 2.73 gears and 3200(2.5) stall?? I'm still on the fence hoping for a deciding factor from you guys.
Btw the tr220 would that be too much with the 2.73 gears and 3200(2.5) stall?? I'm still on the fence hoping for a deciding factor from you guys.
I think your car will perform alright with the TR220 with a 3200 stall and 2.73s. But you will get better performance and driveability if you had at least 3.42 gears. If I were you I would start with a good foundation, T/C, at least 3.42s and headers before I installed a cam.
dang...2:73 gears!, 3200TC and then a cam or headers...spend some time thinking about what you want to end up with (goal) you want to make sure mods match up and compliment one-another...other wise you will find yourself replacing existing mods with "upgrades".... consider 3:42 or at least 3:15 gears, not sure cam and 3200 TC will match to good with 2:73s????
One other thing to consider is your warranty. If your car is still under warranty the headers will not void your engine. But, as soon as you add the cam your engine warranty is gone.
Really depends on what you want to do. Gears (not the subject of your post) will make a real SOTP difference. Bang for buck, I think the cam is the way to go. Headers can certainly accent most engine mods, but I am pretty happy with the H/C system I selected through stock exhaust manifolds.
Z06ufgrad2002 is right about the warranty. Headers [good for 20-30 rwhp] will not void the warranty - a cam might. I'd do headers first as a good base for other mods.
dang...2:73 gears!, 3200TC and then a cam or headers...spend some time thinking about what you want to end up with (goal) you want to make sure mods match up and compliment one-another...other wise you will find yourself replacing existing mods with "upgrades".... consider 3:42 or at least 3:15 gears, not sure cam and 3200 TC will match to good with 2:73s????
:iagree: If you want bang for the buck put 3.42's or 3.90s. You'll feel it in the seat :D