C5 Tech Corvette Tech/Performance: LS1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

afr head question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 12:17 AM
  #21  
MTV's Avatar
MTV
Drifting
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 3
From: Ventura, CA Fight On Forever
St. Jude Donor '03-'04-'05
Default

Originally Posted by JerriVette
Stano did hit 409 rwhp in his stock cammed Z06 though with the afr heads with 66cc chambers and no headers as a point of reference.
I'm almost certain Stano has the 62 cc heads. He told me that his compression ratio was 11:1 which I don't think is achievable with 66 cc.

He also replaced the injectors for more power, but stock cam and exhaust. He did make 409 RWHP on a generous dyno. Those numbers might not be too easy to repeat around town. I saw the AFR car that made 480 RWHP make 460 RWHP on a more stingy dyno. Best,

mtv
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 01:09 AM
  #22  
ArKay99's Avatar
ArKay99
Safety Car
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,558
Likes: 2
From: Cape Coral FL
Default

I can understand the production tolerance of +/- 0.025" for the deck to TDC piston height. But I find it difficult to believe that GM's automated engine assembly process has the capability to measure this tolerance and select a different head gasket based on a 6 sigma distribution model for every LS1/6 engine built since '97. . . I also don't think that an extra 0.025" of quench means the difference between zero KR and serious detonation.

Finally, AFR should know enough to mill the intake mounting surface the same amount as the deck to ensure proper intake manifold fit. Otherwise the intake will sit too high between the milled heads.

There's got to be more to the story. . . Do you have that AFR number available? TIA!!
As it was explained to me, having .025 less deck height translates to about 4cc less combustion chamber volume. If you have heads milled .030 and then have a deck on the short side of that tolerance you can have up to an effective milled head of .055" which comes out to around a 56cc combustion chamber. That would put the CR around 13:1. On the other hand if you have heads milled .030 and have a deck on the tall side you could end up with an effective .005 milled head which would put you at around 10.3:1. These are extreme tolerance differences, no doubt, and for the most part more theoretical than real life, but because the tolerance is there the potential for extremes exists.
I too find it difficult that GM would have several different thickness gaskets available at head mounting time, but that is what I was told and I am just passing that on. I basically derived from that info, that one should determine deck height over piston TDC and compute the actual CR based on the two items that one can control. Gasket thickness and head milling. A blueprinter would have no issue with this since those tolerances would be 'blueprinted out'. However, us guys that want to do a h/c swap, have to hope that aftermarket heads would fit without too much post purchase fiddling. What I am wondering, and starting to realize is, for the majority of us weekenders that undertake these projects the tolerances are within reasonable windows and we don't have to worry about the minutia. But there are some that go into a project armed with the best knowledge they have been able to get and have problems that are difficult to correct, mostly because the tolerance was out, or on the hairy edge.
As far as AFR milling the intake port I'm sure they would do that when milling the surface. Those numbers were just what I was given. I'll bet the max figure was probably based on the amount of clearance under the manifold more that the left/right head spacing.
I called the number on the website and asked to speak to a technical rep. Maybe someone else can call and clarify this.
As for me, I am going to buy my heads shaved .015" and use stock LS1 gaskets. I'm going to have the motor out on a stand because I'll be doing some internal work on it and I'm checking the deck height and ptv clearance as well. I will probably have an set of ISKY flycutting tools hanging around just in case. I submitted you would probably want to have the heads milled after you determined the deck height because it is expensive to do a second time, or to have to flycut the pistons to drop CR is a waste. Didn't mean to rewrite the Magna Carta here, just wanted to discuss this at length and explain I am the messenger and I hope I got the message correct.

Last edited by ArKay99; Jul 22, 2004 at 01:13 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 01:54 AM
  #23  
MTV's Avatar
MTV
Drifting
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 3
From: Ventura, CA Fight On Forever
St. Jude Donor '03-'04-'05
Default

I'm having the AFR H/C job done right now. The car is in the shop and work begins tomorrow, I hope, since it didn't start today. I asked about the tolerances reported in this thread and was told that +/ - 0.025 deck thickness is a huge differential and is an unlikely occurance.

If Arkay's calculations are correct, then GM QC would be out the door with that kind of varriance. I'm running a standard gasket. A very thin gasket could increase the possibility of valve piston clearance, a CR above 11:1 that could ping the engine and or cause timing issues. The last thing I want is to be constantly in the shop trying to get the timing just right or forced to buy only the very best (most expensive) fuel. I like filling up at Costco and want to continue. So it's the 62 cc head, 220/224 581/581 115 LSA, an underdrive pully a better oil pump and 400+ RWHP on an A4 AE. Best,

mtv
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 10:39 AM
  #24  
Shinobi'sZ's Avatar
Shinobi'sZ
Le Mans Master
Veteran: Navy
25 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 6,976
Likes: 527
From: Clouds Over California
Default

Every .006" =s 1cc. So your about .018" higher than average (.007" at least that I have seen or heard) on your deck height. Thats about 3ccs. You can measure the thickness of the AFR heads and compare them to stock. I forgot what the thickness is on LS6 heads but I have measured them before to see whether they had been milled or not. Just for reference my heads have been reworked twice and have had two .005" cleanups done on them which results in .010" shaved off the head. My Deck Height is .014 due to Diamond Pistons w/6.125" rods and a .005" clean up on the block. So that puts me at .024" when considering the piston out of the hole and heads being milled. I run a .581 lift cam...but I also have -2cc valve reliefs. Just make sure the piston to valve clearance is checked you should be ok. If I remember right there shoud be about .005" clearance because things stretch under RPM...go double check that.

Normal deck that I have seen ranges from .003-.009 out of the hole. If the heads are not milled like .030 you should be ok. Nevertheless Piston to Valve Clearance should be OK. Stock 2002 MLS Gaskets are .054". Subtract your deck height and that puts you at .029" quench. I think you will be just fine.

Last edited by Shinobi'sZ; Jul 22, 2004 at 10:50 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 12:14 PM
  #25  
ArKay99's Avatar
ArKay99
Safety Car
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,558
Likes: 2
From: Cape Coral FL
Default

Originally Posted by MTV
I'm having the AFR H/C job done right now. The car is in the shop and work begins tomorrow, I hope, since it didn't start today. I asked about the tolerances reported in this thread and was told that +/ - 0.025 deck thickness is a huge differential and is an unlikely occurance.

If Arkay's calculations are correct, then GM QC would be out the door with that kind of varriance. I'm running a standard gasket. A very thin gasket could increase the possibility of valve piston clearance, a CR above 11:1 that could ping the engine and or cause timing issues. The last thing I want is to be constantly in the shop trying to get the timing just right or forced to buy only the very best (most expensive) fuel. I like filling up at Costco and want to continue. So it's the 62 cc head, 220/224 581/581 115 LSA, an underdrive pully a better oil pump and 400+ RWHP on an A4 AE. Best,

mtv
MTV, just to keep things clear, I didn't state the the tolerance was +-.025 but the TOTAL tolerance is .025. I implied that with my example and was incorrect. Sorry for that error. It was late. That would put the +- figures in the +-.012 range. But that could still acount for enough CR variance to cause detonation with heads milled as small as .030.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 02:38 PM
  #26  
Jason 98 TA's Avatar
Jason 98 TA
Premium Supporting Vendor
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,984
Likes: 19
From: Texas Speed TX
Default

The standard AFRs are 66cc. We offer decking for a additonal $75 when you order the heads. The key like several guys have said is to always check p/v clearance with bigger camshafts. We've run a 224 & 225 camshaft with heads cut 25 before & had no issues. That being said its always better safe than sorry. We have 10 sets of the AFR heads on order, if anyone has any questions or is looking for a set drop me a IM.

Jason
Texas Speed
www.texas-speed.com
806.866.0734
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 03:17 PM
  #27  
Mirek's Avatar
Mirek
Burning Brakes
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 901
Likes: 83
From: Los Angeles
Default

Ok, deck height variance was what led to messed up compression leading to detonation on an AFR built LS engine with AFR heads milled .30 for a 62 CC. The solution is to check deck height and then work backwards. Seems like a lot of work. I am going to go milled .30 for a 62 CC and use a stock gasket (not certain of its exact thickness) & unless I have an “extreme� variance on the low side I hope to be fine with no detonation on 93 octane. P/V clearance should not be an issue with a lift of .566 (I hope). How does duration matter ? (EDIT) duration @.50 or advertised duration? (mine is 286 which is longer than the newer xe lobe 224 cams) What compression does a .25 mill allow ?
Thanks for the tough info guys.

Last edited by Mirek; Jul 22, 2004 at 03:30 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 04:40 PM
  #28  
pdd000's Avatar
pdd000
Thread Starter
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,799
Likes: 11
From: dudley MA
Default

my heads spinnin
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-7

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 06:11 PM
  #29  
Mirek's Avatar
Mirek
Burning Brakes
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 901
Likes: 83
From: Los Angeles
Default

Oh yea and how much HP can I expect from my K&N....Haha J/K
Look what you started.
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:11 AM.

story-0
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-2
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE