When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I am ready to purchase some LT headers but can't decide if I should get Hi-Flow cats or not. Can someone give me details on why the extra $400 is worth it? Seems if I go with LG I will still need Sims or Tuning so why bother with cats in the first place?
I don't have an inspection to worry about in my city / state.
Jacksonville must be nice brother
I'm about to do headers, probably Kooks, and am going to do without cats as well. We have inspections in PA, but that's easy to get around.
I posted a few weeks back about this one and most people agreed I'd pick up 10-15 ponies without the cats. One member said he had somewhat noxious fumes that would burn his eyes at stop lights, but to me stop lights with wind going in just the right direction aren't worth giving up the extra horses. I see guys spending $$ on heads and only pick up 20-30 horses.
I'm catless next week. I believe the emissions aren't off the charts anyhow. I'm hoping to get a report after cats so I can post it.
Our cars are ranked as well as 4 cyl Honda's in terms of emissions with cats. Without cats may be a whole different deal.
If you don't have to worry about inspection then I would say go for it. However, if your LEO's tend to have spot inpections then you may want to reconsider. I went with cats cause Jersey is pretty tough on inspections here. But, if I register it "classic" there is no emissions. But I can only put on 2500 miles a year.
I am ready to purchase some LT headers but can't decide if I should get Hi-Flow cats or not. Can someone give me details on why the extra $400 is worth it? Seems if I go with LG I will still need Sims or Tuning so why bother with cats in the first place?
I don't have an inspection to worry about in my city / state.
Err, how about being a responsible member of society? Sorry, but this is a pet peeve of mine (and other CF members as well.) And look at the first response you recvd. Clearly the only "concern" was if the driver could smell / choke on the exhaust, screw everyone else!(?)
I went with the LG's without cats and do not regret it. If you get a good tune, others have even been able to pass sniffer tests even without the cats. If they did a visual inspection you would be hosed, but we don't have to worry about that in Florida either.
Err, how about being a responsible member of society? Sorry, but this is a pet peeve of mine (and other CF members as well.) And look at the first response you recvd. Clearly the only "concern" was if the driver could smell / choke on the exhaust, screw everyone else!(?)
A properly tuned car will pollute no more without cats than with them. This has been proven time and again, and I even know of cars that have passed emissions testing after the cats were removed. Cats were mandated back in 75 when the technology didn't exist to make cars run cleaner. Cars today are efficient enough to not need cats, but the environmentalists wouldn't be happy, so we're stuck with them.
Now, as for the one driver who said there were fumes, I am inclined to believe it was another problem, not the missing cats. All cars built prior to 75 don't even have cats, and I've never heard of anyone getting sick or dying driving one of those cars. Again, it's all about keeping the car tuned right. Cats do little to nothing to actually clean up the cars emissions now a days.
A properly tuned car will pollute no more without cats than with them. This has been proven time and again, and I even know of cars that have passed emissions testing after the cats were removed. Cats were mandated back in 75 when the technology didn't exist to make cars run cleaner. Cars today are efficient enough to not need cats, but the environmentalists wouldn't be happy, so we're stuck with them.
Now, as for the one driver who said there were fumes, I am inclined to believe it was another problem, not the missing cats. All cars built prior to 75 don't even have cats, and I've never heard of anyone getting sick or dying driving one of those cars. Again, it's all about keeping the car tuned right. Cats do little to nothing to actually clean up the cars emissions now a days.
Does that motorcycle of yours have cats?
Hmm, I'm not sure how to respond to this one.. And yes, there are several new HP motorcycle models from multiple manufacturers (2004 Yamaha R1 comes to mind, 160 HP bone stock) that have a catalytic converter. Please don't think for a moment that if today’s cars polluted at pre-1976 levels (and given the fact there are WAY more cars on the road today) that every single day would be a "condition red air pollution warning day" instead of every-other day, like we have here in metro Ga. "Denial" 'ain't just a river in Egypt.
Hmm, I'm not sure how to respond to this one.. And yes, there are several new HP motorcycle models from multiple manufacturers (2004 Yamaha R1 comes to mind, 160 HP bone stock) that have a catalytic converter. Please don't think for a moment that if today’s cars polluted at pre-1976 levels (and given the fact there are WAY more cars on the road today) that every single day would be a "condition red air pollution warning day" instead of every-other day, like we have here in metro Ga. "Denial" 'ain't just a river in Egypt.
Apparently you didn't read what I said. I never said cars that polluted at 1976 levels were O.K. What I said was that Cats are not needed to keep the pollution levels in check since the technology has progressed so far since 1976. Todays cars put out emissions that are a fraction of what they were then, and they don't need cats to do so. If todays cars can pass emissions withot cats (and they can if tuned properly), why have them?
Ever stop to think that the "pollution warning days" you have might not be caused by cars alone?
You didn't answer my question either. Does your bike have Cats? Seems as if you were as genuinely concerned as you say, you'd have added them by now.
I have no scientific data to back my own experience up but I know my car with an aggresive cam and no cats creates a terriable smell. The car is dead nuts on as far as the tune but it will make you cry if your near the exhaust pipes for more than a minute.
I have thought about putting cats on the car but it won't pass emission anyway so I am just going to live with it for now
A properly tuned car will pollute no more without cats than with them. This has been proven time and again, and I even know of cars that have passed emissions testing after the cats were removed. Cats were mandated back in 75 when the technology didn't exist to make cars run cleaner. Cars today are efficient enough to not need cats, but the environmentalists wouldn't be happy, so we're stuck with them.
Environmentalists don't specify that cars have cats. They pressure lawmakers to set emission levels that promote cleaner air and are commercially achievable. Cats are expensive and use scarce and expensive metals. Vehicle Manufacturers would not use them if they were not needed to meet the current standards. Take off your cats and you WILL notice a noxious odor that sure quacks like pollution.
I have no scientific data to back my own experience up but I know my car with an aggresive cam and no cats creates a terriable smell. The car is dead nuts on as far as the tune but it will make you cry if your near the exhaust pipes for more than a minute.
I have thought about putting cats on the car but it won't pass emission anyway so I am just going to live with it for now
Mine will make you cry sometimes if it hits you just right. Car has been tuned and runs great. My interior smells like exhaust every time I open the door to get in. I hate that. I'm getting LT headers soon, but will still be catless. Guess I'll just suck up the exhaust smell b/c I can't see paying 4 hundred bucks for cats.
I pulled my cats and put them back on the next week - I was sick of smelling like gas everytime I got to work!! The smell burned my eyes and made me and my car stink.....mine is a daily driver so I couldn't stand it!!
The smell thing is no rumor. I think it is worth the extra money for the high flow cats if you are running it as a daily driver. I had the offroad x-pipe put in instead of the cats on my 99' and I gained about 10hp across the board to the wheels but then again I was running B&B shorties with a route 66 exhaust. IMO if you are going to go off road and want to drive it on the street make sure you set it up so you can easily bolt in cats at a later date if you change your mind.
Apparently you didn't read what I said. I never said cars that polluted at 1976 levels were O.K. What I said was that Cats are not needed to keep the pollution levels in check since the technology has progressed so far since 1976. Todays cars put out emissions that are a fraction of what they were then, and they don't need cats to do so. If todays cars can pass emissions withot cats (and they can if tuned properly), why have them?
Ever stop to think that the "pollution warning days" you have might not be caused by cars alone?
You didn't answer my question either. Does your bike have Cats? Seems as if you were as genuinely concerned as you say, you'd have added them by now.
..And have you read the last 5+ posts?? As far as my bike goes, a: Motorcycles are such a small percentage of the overall emissions equation (due to the sheer number of vehicles, and the size and efficiency of their motors) that it's a silly argument to say it's o.k. to run your 350 C.I.D. HP motor w/o cats and use motorcycles as a valid example of why it's o.k.; and b: It's a racing vehicle. No where did I state that "dedicated racing vehicles should have cats". IMO racing vehicles (again, an extremely small percentage of the overall population) should get a "free pass", although the world community disagrees, by virtue of continued steps / regulations clearly aimed at reducing the overall pollution output. Over the last 10 years racing orgs have outlawed leaded gas, restricted the fuel payload to force the manufacturers to improve fuel efficiency, etc. If you choose to believe a vehicle produces no additional emissions compared to one without cats, I can't help you. I'll I ask is please do not try to convince others to do likewise.
But if you're going to be a "responsible member of society" like you put it even racing vehicles should have emissions. Why should they get a free pass? Pollution is everywhere, not just on the city streets. Just because a person is racing it doesn't give him any more right to pollute the air. It doesn't seem fair to lay a guilt trip on one person and let another have a free ride.
Wait a minute, it sounds like I'm arguing for the opposite side. You won't get any guilt trip from me. No emissions checks here so no cats for me. Sorry. And I hope they never force emissions on racing vehicles.
I think the answer to pollution is to quit having so many babies.
Last edited by Donovan 572; Aug 24, 2004 at 02:51 PM.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.