emissions
IMO emission testing is just another excuse for the Government to intrude into everyone's life and yet another bureaucracy designed to take your money. Politicians like to jump on the popularity bandwagon but the fact of the matter is emission testing is a waste!
The over-whelming majority of cars pass the emissions test. The small percentage of vehicles that don't pass the test does not justify the expense and inconvenience of testing. With the natural attrition of older vehicles and newer cars passing the test easily....there is truly no need to test vehicles en masse. Besides, if they ever figured all the pollutants released just by cars waiting in-line to be tested, it would probably exceed all the pollutants released by the small number of cars that fail the test. For the minimal effectiveness of testing; for the man hours of productivity lost; and, for the needless expense to the taxpayer’s emissions testing is unwarranted.
You mention headers. Cars with long tube headers will likely pass a sniffer test but may fail to pass a visual inspection...with relocated, after-market cats. If your car can pass a sniffer test and isn't releasing excessive pollutants...what's the big deal? I've heard the argument that the relocated cats are moved further back...they will take a little longer to heat-up and fire and during this additional time period your car will pollute more. IMO that's still pretty weak. If you can drive into a testing station and pass the 'sniffer' test that should be the important thing. Are they going to go-after motorcycles or big-rig, semi-tractors for polluting...probably not?
Many testing stations are getting away from a sniffer test altogether...they simply plug-into your car to check for codes. If your car isn't exhibiting any fault codes you pass the test. They may, however, still fail you based on a visual inspection. Despite Governmental regulations and emissions testing, I know some Corvette owners that routinely pass emissions test with long tube headers while others may not be so fortunate. Go figure!

One of their biggest asshat moves was a harsh provision in the "Smog Check 2" law that would impund a vehicle if it failed a second smog test. That was repealled.
Another one of their brilliant decisions was mandating MTBE be required in gas to reduce emissions, which ended up poisoning the water all across the state. It was bad news, and they forced it down our throats (literally & figuratively). It cost us more at the pump to pay for gas with it, and then again cost us more to reformulate the refineries to stop using it.
And still to this day, the board is completely independent of the voters in inacting legislation that can greatly effect us economically with gas reformulations (which we pay the costs for).
Hopefully you all in Florida will do things more rationally, with some actual due process - unlike California.
Last edited by djfullshred; Jul 13, 2007 at 01:00 PM.
I don't mind the testing, and think it can be helpful. Just yesterday was behind a last gen-Mustang and right away by sound and smell knew he had no CATs. And it sucked being stuck behind him, because his car stunk. So, I'd personally would like to see guys like him get caught, cause I don't want to have to breath in what he was putting out. It was not pleasant in rush hour traffic being behind him.
But I've done loud exhaust mods and other mods, and know friends who have done a ton of mods to their cars, and all still pass. Just leave the CATs on, and you'll pass.
Here in the People's Republic of Minnesota we actually reversed our emissions testing program - eliminated it altogether. Back in the early-mid 90's, all cars had to be tested annually if they were registered in the 7 county metropolitan area (Minneapolis/St. Paul). It was a joke - if a car failed, it could still be passed if the repairs were to cost in excess of a few hundred dollars. All that did was allow junkers to remain on the street without penalty. We got rid of it, and I can only say
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts











