MPH Accuracy
Your word against the officers as in how fast you think/really were going. We all know who usually wins that argument.
Good Luck
I..P..
Go to court for two reasons:a. The trooper may not show up; case dismissed.
b. If he does show up, if you had your speedometer accuracy or inaccuracy verified, take the results or repair bill to court with you. When the judge asks how you plead, plead not guilty and challenge the trooper to show that his equipment was in proper working order and calibrated within the specified timelines in Florida. I got a speeding ticket dismissed because the officer did not have the car's speedometer calibrated in the last six months.
And I would not be showing the results of the accuracy check to the supervisor; it accomplishes nothing other than give the trooper a heads-up when he comes to court.
JMHO and best of luck.

In the other 4 you can write a lettter to the DA and he is forced to give you any evidence they possess about the case. It's called discovery. I would be very suprised if CA is really any different in that regard. I know of no states that require discovery to be performed by a lawyer....hence people can still represent themselves.
Thats what I have done and it works to get the information I need.
The state is the custodian of the records of their own equipment, so they need to produce ti for you upon request.
I have seen a guy get his (huge) ticket thrown out in court becasue he requested all these records in writing and didn't get them in a timely fashion from the state. Game. Set. Match.
If you really feel you need an expert for the radar gun, that is up to you. I can count the number of times I have actually seen that on one hand. Actually, one finger. And I suspect the case was actually revolving around a DUI, where the guy got pulled over for speeding. But I didn't stay for all the fun.
Radar is notoriously innaccurate. Its just a nature of the beast. High performance radar costs big bucks, and it just isn't worth it to HWP to pay for that when cheap, innaccurate untis can write just as many (or more) tickets.
This is all "been there, done that" information. Not speculation. (You may address me as Mr. Mason if you like.
)You can find an awful lot of resources at soem larger libraries and certainly from "fight ticket" specific books I am quite certain.
Remember, if about 3% of people fought their tickets the system would fall apart. They count on you NOT fighting them, and as such things liek this go on unchecked. I'm not like an anarchist or anyhting like that
, but that is just what our traffic system has become.





In the other 4 you can write a letter to the DA and he is forced to give you any evidence they possess about the case. It's called discovery. I would be very surprised if CA is really any different in that regard. I know of no states that require discovery to be performed by a lawyer....hence people can still represent themselves.
That's what I have done and it works to get the information I need.
The state is the custodian of the records of their own equipment, so they need to produce ti for you upon request.
I have seen a guy get his (huge) ticket thrown out in court because he requested all these records in writing and didn't get them in a timely fashion from the state. Game. Set. Match.
If you really feel you need an expert for the radar gun, that is up to you. I can count the number of times I have actually seen that on one hand. Actually, one finger. And I suspect the case was actually revolving around a DUI, where the guy got pulled over for speeding. But I didn't stay for all the fun.
Radar is notoriously inaccurate. Its just a nature of the beast. High performance radar costs big bucks, and it just isn't worth it to HWP to pay for that when cheap, inaccurate units can write just as many (or more) tickets.
This is all "been there, done that" information. Not speculation. (You may address me as Mr. Mason if you like.
)You can find an awful lot of resources at some larger libraries and certainly from "fight ticket" specific books I am quite certain.
Remember, if about 3% of people fought their tickets the system would fall apart. They count on you NOT fighting them, and as such things like this go on unchecked. I'm not like an anarchist or anything like that
, but that is just what our traffic system has become.Also, with a DIY approach, one slip up on a legal technical issue and the judge once again sides with LEO.
Although I guess at this point you are not a novice in this area.
Best of both worlds - be retired with a heavy foot and lots of time to beat the tickets!
When he came up to the car he asked if I knew why he pulled me over. I said yes, I was in a group of vehicles that were over the speed limit. He asked if I knew how fast I was going. I said yes, 72 mph. He said try 86. I said to him that he must have gotten the wrong car. His reply was "How many other Corvettes were in that group, do you know??" Of course the answer was zero. I said sir I'm an honest person and I swear that I was driving 72, which I know was 12 mph over the limit. He asked if I knew I was in a construction zone and I said yes.
The guy took my license and registration and left. When he came back he said he gave me a break and didn't put it in a construction zone. I was upset till I called to find out what the fine was. Turns out he wrote the ticket for 85 in a 60 non-construction. 26 over in a non-construction was a $685 fine. 25 over in a non construction was $212. 12 mph in a construction was $356. So he gave me a decent break all around.
I checked my speedometer after that. My cruise shows a different speed than my analog speedometer. My cruise is right on and the analog is 1 mph high between 40 and 65 and from 65-80, the highest I checked the analog is 2 mph faster than I'm actually going.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Last edited by crabby; Aug 28, 2007 at 10:17 PM. Reason: spell





















