need an alignment


Factory specs will also cause excess wear on the inside of the tires.
Do you want nimble? Use Factory settings.
Do you want maximum wear? Drop all the Camber to -0.1, 0 toe in rear, -0.01 toe in front. My current settings.
Elmer
Last edited by eboggs_jkvl; Mar 6, 2008 at 10:52 AM.


I agree with the "Don't go to the dealer."
I agree on the proper inflation.
I agree on the handling.
I don't agree on the maximum wear. The camber is too much to give a flat wear across the entire tire footprint. Keeping the stock camber will wear out the inside of the tire before the outside. If you are tracking the car, the stock settings are fine and tracking the car says I will accept a large amount of tire wear. If you want maximum mileage on the tires, you need to drop the camber down. The lower camber will give better highway mileage for the tires. I vividly recall the pictures of the guy's tires that had cords showing on the inside lip and still had adequate rubber in the middle and outer edges. This is what I'm referring to: http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show...7&postcount=20
Last edited by eboggs_jkvl; Aug 25, 2007 at 11:15 AM.



BTW, the closest store of that chain is 3/4 mi. from my house but they recommend a store 20 miles away because they had better alignment equipment. Does one need to be aware that some alignment equipment does a better job? I also understood that the local dealer (2 miles) didn't have the better equipment.
Last edited by Forvettes; Aug 25, 2007 at 12:00 PM.


BTW, the closest store of that chain is 3/4 mi. from my house but they recommend a store 20 miles away because they had better alignment equipment. Does one need to be aware that some alignment equipment does a better job? I also understood that the local dealer (2 miles) didn't have the better equipment.
If you drove a lot of twisties and autocross, the turns would have a "flat" foot print for better traction. So drive zigzag all the time and your tires will wear evenly drive in a lot of "straight" and the inside will go before the rest.
That's how I see it. The "pros" can take their shots now.
I agree on the proper inflation.
I agree on the handling.
I don't agree on the maximum wear. The camber is too much to give a flat wear across the entire tire footprint. Keeping the stock camber will wear out the inside of the tire before the outside. If you are tracking the car, the stock settings are fine and tracking the car says I will accept a large amount of tire wear. If you want maximum mileage on the tires, you need to drop the camber down. The lower camber will give better highway mileage for the tires. I vividly recall the pictures of the guy's tires that had cords showing on the inside lip and still had adequate rubber in the middle and outer edges. This is what I'm referring to: http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show...7&postcount=20

Specs;
LF camber -0.2°, caster 2.8°, toe 0.09°
RF ------- -0.3°, ----- 2.9°, --- 0.10°
LR camber -0.4°, toe 0.00°
RR ------ -0.4°, --- 0.01°
I kept the same alignment specs for the BFG KDW2's that replaced the Supercars.


Specs;
LF camber -0.2°, caster 2.8°, toe 0.09°
RF ------- -0.3°, ----- 2.9°, --- 0.10°
LR camber -0.4°, toe 0.00°
RR ------ -0.4°, --- 0.01°
I kept the same alignment specs for the BFG KDW2's that replaced the Supercars.
LF camber -0.45°, caster 7.9°, toe 0.10°
RF ------- -0.45°, ----- 7.9°, --- 0.10°
LR camber -0.45°, toe 0.00°
RR ------ -0.45°, --- 0.00°
Comparing the two, you have less camber in the front than stock calls for. You rears are good. Your front Caster is way off of the stock numbers.
My settings
LF camber -0.1°, caster 8.2°, toe 0.01°
RF ------- -0.1°, ----- 8.2°, --- 0.01°
LR camber -0.1°, toe 0.03°
RR ------ -0.1°, --- -0.03°
So, are you saying you are running "stock" settings or you have "custom" settings per your specific settings requested?
Elmer
Last edited by eboggs_jkvl; Aug 26, 2007 at 01:22 PM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts


Go to any alignment shop. Ask what are you using? Then ask how old is it? Is there anything newer? Then call around and see if anyone has the newer gear. That is what I did and I found the GY dealer. When you "ask" for an specific alignment, stress that is WHAT you want and you don't like +/- variables.
LF camber -0.45°, caster 7.9°, toe 0.10°
RF ------- -0.45°, ----- 7.9°, --- 0.10°
LR camber -0.45°, toe 0.00°
RR ------ -0.45°, --- 0.00°
Comparing the two, you have less camber in the front than stock calls for. You rears are good. Your front Caster is way off of the stock numbers.
My settings
LF camber -0.1°, caster 8.2°, toe 0.01°
RF ------- -0.1°, ----- 8.2°, --- 0.01°
LR camber -0.1°, toe 0.03°
RR ------ -0.1°, --- -0.03°
So, are you saying you are running "stock" settings or you have "custom" settings per your specific settings requested?
Elmer
The "less camber" is 0.05°! 5/100 of a degree! I guess you could call it custom, the settings are what was recommended by the shop owner after he questioned my goals and use of the car. He wanted more caster but couldn't get it with the stock setup.


Ok, your Caster is up high and I agree with it.
I didn't see any changes to your camber numbers but basically my thoughts are get the wheels flat while you go down the highway. The -0.1 is my camber setting as opposed to the -0.45 the book calls for. The numbers you listed were -0.2 and -0.3 on the front of your car and -0.4 on the rear. Is that correct?
Last edited by eboggs_jkvl; Mar 6, 2008 at 10:51 AM.
Ok, your Caster is up high and I agree with it.
I didn't see any changes to your camber numbers but basically my thoughts are get the wheels flat while you go down the highway. The -0.1 is my camber setting as opposed to the -0.45 the book calls for. The numbers you listed were -0.2 and -0.3 on the front of your car and -0.4 on the rear. Is that correct?
Thanks.
Does anyone have any recommendations on alignment place around the SJ/SF Bay Area?






















