Why the import hate?
The American vs. Ricer or Chevy vs. Ford kind of mentality is just silly kids stuff imo.
I WON'T EVEN GO INTO THE CLOTHING, SHOES,CAMERAS,FURNITURE, AND EVERYTHING ELSE THAT YOU CAN THINK OF.
The Americans a(and I am a proud veteran) have lost the industrial war.
If we don't get off of our lazy asses and do something other then flip burgers we are domed to be at the mercy of third world countries that have people willing to work harder then we are.
We can't even answer our phones, when you call American Express, Dell,Apple or any other large company you get new delhi or some other third world country.
WHY CAN'T WE EVEN ANSWER OUR OWN PHONES?
Own, drive, and savor whatever you like... within your fiscal means, of course (disregard that codicil at your own peril).
Import - shmimport... We live in a global economy - like it or not. Some components on almost every vehicle manufactured came from somewhere other than the vehicle's presumed country of production... Get over it.
This vehicular "hating" syndrome is no more that artificial "peer pressure" fueled by less than subtle marketing, advertising, and media manipulation. Profit is the goal... everything else is rhetoric.
Personally, I own and drive/ride what I like... and it's an eclectic collection: G35 6MT Coupe, G35 6MT Sedan, Audi CS Turbo Quattro, and an E250 van to haul the bikes (2 Hondas - GL1800, CBR1100XX; 2 Harleys - FLH, XLX; and 2 Confederate Hellcats).
I've had 2 Corvettes ('64 Coupe, '87 Coupe) and am considering acquiring a new one, notwithstanding that I'm running out of space in the shop/garage...
Life is just too damn short for all this "hating" crap... Why waste the time..? Time is all you really have - and that's limited.
Drive & Ride Safe! ... oh yeah, and Savor Life while you can..!
Okay, move along now... Nothin' to see here...
When I buy a Vette, yes, some of the parts and subassemblies are built in Canada and Mexico and even Japan, but the bottom line is that the profit for that car goes to Detroit. Its assembly employs American workers and supports local economies. Think about what would be in Bowling Green if the plant wasn't there.
To me, buying an import means that most of my money is going to a foreign country. Honda builds cars here in Ohio. Toyota builds down in Georgetown, KY. There are plants all over the country, BMW in Spartanburg, Mercedes in Tuscaloosa. Those plants do support the local economy the same way as GM supports KY, but the profit from those sales is going back to the home company. Honda and Toyota of Japan are getting a share of the pie. BMW is a closely held company and all of it's profits go back to Germany.
Furthermore, there's the tariff situation. The reason that most foreign manufacturers started building cars in this country was to get around the tariffs that are imposed on imported goods. We however are not afforded that luxury. A Cadillac imported into Japan costs the rough equivalent of $100K based on the tariffs that are imposed on the vehicles that we try to ship over there.
I could keep going, but to sum up, it's mostly for economic reasons with a hint of patriotism (some will call it xenophobia, but I don't care) that I won't buy an import - at least not a new one.
Local wages count more than profits. Even in break-even years, GM will employ hundreds of thousands of people. If my sole proprietorship taco stand posts a bigger profit (as it well might), would you argue that my taco stand is more important to the United States economy than General Motors?
A dollar paid to an American worker is a dollar paid to an American worker, whether it comes from a manufacturer incorporated in Germany, Japan, or the United States. Those dollars *do* go into the local economy. If GM were to shut down all U.S. engineering and manufacturing and moved all operations to China -- but kept their corporate headquarters in Detroit -- would you still argue for the "American" Chevy and against the "foreign" Toyota made in Kentucky?
The question of which brand is "better" for the U.S. economy is way more complex than where the board meetings are held. I concede that it's probably true that dollars spent on GM products in general benefit the U.S. economy more than dollars spent on Toyotas, in general, but certainly not in all cases -- and it has more to do with where their operations are located, and less to do with where they're incorporated.
And what about the nationality of the shareholders? If foreign banks own a majority share of GM, what then?
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
If you consider an American car as one that is made here, then many Hondas, Toyotas, Hyundais, BMW's, and Subarus, etc. would have to be called American cars. If an imported car is one made of non-American parts, then all American made cars would have to be considered imported. Even the Corvette has lots of foreign made parts.
As U.S. and foreign corporations merge with, buy, and partially take over other companies, the lines between what is domestic and foreign are no longer that clearly defined. Right now, domestic versus foreign, in cars, is merely based on a percentage of non-American made parts. Since many "foreign"car brands are now assembled here, how else can you do it?
Again, I don't see it as a deciding factor in my car purchases. I'll buy whatever car I feel best suits my needs. Whatever that turns out to be, I'm buying it from an American dealership, with American employees, and paying for it with American dollars.

"When I buy a Vette, yes, some of the parts and subassemblies are built in Canada and Mexico and even Japan, but the bottom line is that the profit for that car goes to Detroit. Its assembly employs American workers and supports local economies. Think about what would be in Bowling Green if the plant wasn't there.
To me, buying an import means that most of my money is going to a foreign country. Honda builds cars here in Ohio. Toyota builds down in Georgetown, KY. There are plants all over the country, BMW in Spartanburg, Mercedes in Tuscaloosa. Those plants do support the local economy the same way as GM supports KY, but the profit from those sales is going back to the home company. Honda and Toyota of Japan are getting a share of the pie. BMW is a closely held company and all of it's profits go back to Germany."
Last edited by robbiC5; Mar 12, 2008 at 05:53 PM.
But.... I wont get one for myself, its not my cup of tea! I just like american cars, IMO I think the front end of the american cars have a meaner looking configuration, and the japs basically look happier and more jolly! Happy and jolly dont look to well for a car that accelerates at a high rate of speed. Id rather have a meaner looking front end!
The vettes nose looks like it has a face that says "Dont f*ck wtih me, just move aside"
Last edited by pTr73; Mar 12, 2008 at 05:59 PM.
I don't see the need to look at foreign products if I can find one made in the USA. I prefer to help US workers keep their jobs instead of sending my $$ overseas when I can help it. Heck, we send so much out already, why not try to support one of the major mfg industries that is still doing business in the US?
I'm not going to kick the US companies in the gut when they are down. Maybe it's the internet sites that I read, but it seems like every person out there is out to see the US go down the tubes. I'm not going to contribute by buying big ticket items mfg'd in another country if I can find a similar product made in the US. Plain and simple.
"When I buy a Vette, yes, some of the parts and subassemblies are built in Canada and Mexico and even Japan, but the bottom line is that the profit for that car goes to Detroit. Its assembly employs American workers and supports local economies. Think about what would be in Bowling Green if the plant wasn't there.
To me, buying an import means that most of my money is going to a foreign country. Honda builds cars here in Ohio. Toyota builds down in Georgetown, KY. There are plants all over the country, BMW in Spartanburg, Mercedes in Tuscaloosa. Those plants do support the local economy the same way as GM supports KY, but the profit from those sales is going back to the home company. Honda and Toyota of Japan are getting a share of the pie. BMW is a closely held company and all of it's profits go back to Germany."
Good analysis. I tend to agree with this line of though. I want to add one more point...that each foreign car company plant opened in the US is more than likely replacing a US car plant someplace else in the US (most likely in my state of Michigan). That matters a lot.
Reading between the lines in these magazines really shows me how anti-US car a lot of the writers are. It's either my bias, or it's theirs. A lot of times, when they praise a US car, they also add some cynical remarks.
For example, the ZR1 article in Motor Trend, Feb 2008 issue reads "Whoa, eas off the Red Bull, Tom. This is just a souped-up C6 Corvette, right? Or did you slip a mid-engine V12 in without the blogosphere noticing?"
OK, since it's not the latter, it must be the former. JUST A SOUPED-UP C6....is how I read that. Even though I have been somewhat critical of the zr1, that car is not about flash and glitz or shiny things. It's about an evolution from a great z06 platform to something a few notches above. Lots of refinement and subtle updates. I hope that thing obliterates some of the stupid foreign cars that get a pass in the rags before even competing in a way that is fair and accurate. The magazines (C&D, Motor Trend) seem to have people on staff that are not really American car fans. When I see articles written that go out of their way for something negative to say, it makes me come up with my opinions about the magazines and the writers. Probably not going to renew Motor Trend. More objectivity, less editorials, plz.
Same article:
"The hardware and numbers sound impressive and we're rooting for the home team, but can a car with a front weight bias really smoke a GT3 or F430 Scuderia around the 'Ring? And if it does, will the well-heeled queue up to buy one?"
Now, where the zr1 is being criticized for a front weight bias, other cars (Porches) seem to skate when you see articles talking about that wonderful rear mounted engine. No, on these cars, you have to know how to drive it properly, so it's not a detriment. Also, he questions whether GM will be able to sell them. I didn't think that statement was necessary, and I think it is self-answering. Will people who like German performance cars line up to buy the zr1? No. Will people who are fans of the Vette buy one that can afford to? YES. Anyone here think it will be tough to sell the 2K quantity per year? I don't think so, even with the economic times. I could be wrong, but 2K cars is very small. You get a lot of performance for the dollar, even WITH the (oh, no) forward weight bias.
I also notice where the magazines ridicule the Ford Shelby GT500 as heavy, a pig, etc, for weighing 3800lbs. Looking at the same mag on the GTR, which weighs more than the Mustang and has less power, I did not see any mention of it being a lard-o.
These are the subtle things I see all the time. It's inconsistent across US vs foreign cars, and it happens all the time. Maybe it's just me?
That's what bothers me.. but I guess we can blame the politicians too.
I don't have anything against imports... My wife drives a Honda.. It's a new world...
Now that GM is cranking out world class cars that can compete in most segments of the market... I have no need to buy an import... I would rather keep my money here... as much as possible anyway..
There are cars that contain more Michigan content than the Corvette -- particularly the previous LS2 Corvettes. As a patriotic citizen of Michigan, you could have bought one of those cars instead.
Except you would have wound up with a car you didn't want. So as much as that might "help" some people in Michigan, it would hurt you. And you, too, are part of Michigan, and the United States.
Car manufacturing is not make-work. It is not an end in itself. It is not a charity. If a foreign-made car is cheaper or better (by whatever standard) for a particular American buyer, that buyer benefits. And that, in and of itself, is good for the United States.
That said, I like the idea of owning American-made stuff and supporting an increasingly-bygone tradition of American manufacturing. I have a toolbox full of absurdly-overpriced Snap-On hand tools that backs that up. But charity is not what made this economy what it was, and the only way forward is to continue to make better products.





















