2009 Problems
Safety Car
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,642
Likes: 9
From: Dalllas/Ft Worth Area TX
...I honestly believe that GM is committed to resolving all reliability issues that effect the C6, even though their customer service leaves lots to be desired. 
...My hope is that it will eventually evolve into a totally reliable vehicle so that we seldom, if ever, even have to discuss this on the board.
...My hope is that it will eventually evolve into a totally reliable vehicle so that we seldom, if ever, even have to discuss this on the board.
Burning Brakes
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 815
Likes: 1
From: Mesa "highlands" AZ
The problem is GM fault because they ARE ACCEPTING THE LOWEST BID AND THEY ARE GETTING CHEAP AND INFERIOR PARTS, we pay a "Corvette Tax" for those inferior parts. GM wonders why they are having financial problems, they are sure slow learners. If GM keeps up their attitude of business practices, we WON'T have to worry about warranty problems, THERE WON'T BE A WARRANTY OR GM!
This is an absolutely UNINFORMED STATEMENT and probably just displays frustration, more than knowledge.
As a former Purchasing Manager from GM I can say, based on discussions with my competitive colleagues, ALL MANUFACTURERS ACCEPT THE LOWEST BID....AND I MEAN ALL (there are a few very rare exceptions).
The paramount issue to this acceptance is to assure the design specs, by the GM engineer, is accurate in reflecting the ACCEPTED performance of the part. And, to assure the LIST OF BIDDERS contain potential suppliers that have the ability to adequately perform to the requirement.
Unfortunately, GM MAY have failed with these requirements, in some instances.
But, to center this issue, on lowest bidder (per se) is a little misleading. Someone at GM, whether it is engineering, design or administrative, did not do their job adequately.
Advanced
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
I am not being silly 
It's just that I've been reading a lot of the posts here and am starting to wonder if I should pull the trigger. I know this is not a comparison but I purchased a 2004 Honda Accord and I have yet to have a problem with my Honda. Yes there were a few recalls on the car (about 3) that were taken care of from the dealer. I also have a 1990 Nissan 300ZX and never had my T-Top fly off while driving!...LOL
It's just that I've been reading a lot of the posts here and am starting to wonder if I should pull the trigger. I know this is not a comparison but I purchased a 2004 Honda Accord and I have yet to have a problem with my Honda. Yes there were a few recalls on the car (about 3) that were taken care of from the dealer. I also have a 1990 Nissan 300ZX and never had my T-Top fly off while driving!...LOL
Burning Brakes
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 0
From: Evans Georgia
There isn't any reason they can't just put a new module in and keep the same trans in the car. Only reason to replace it would be internal damage. The module is inside the case but not a huge problem. You'll be fine and then life will soon be good again!
I don't believe there are any "dry compartments" in the 6L80.
And if the labor guide says 3 hours, then the trans is not being pulled from the car. I expect it is similar to replacing a valve body on a 400 Hydra Matic. Not a huge job and nothing to worry about.
I don't believe there are any "dry compartments" in the 6L80.
And if the labor guide says 3 hours, then the trans is not being pulled from the car. I expect it is similar to replacing a valve body on a 400 Hydra Matic. Not a huge job and nothing to worry about.
Good luck.
