When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Well here's a little nugget of information for you,take it as you will. Check your local laws because here in NC,all an attorney has to show is 1% contribution to an accident to make it a no fault case. And painting your marker lights could easily be proven to have been contributory,however slightly......
Would really suck to get stuck with a totalled car just because of the "cool" factor of painted lights.
Well here's a little nugget of information for you,take it as you will. Check your local laws because here in NC,all an attorney has to show is 1% contribution to an accident to make it a no fault case. And painting your marker lights could easily be proven to have been contributory,however slightly......
Would really suck to get stuck with a totalled car just because of the "cool" factor of painted lights.
With all do respect that's reaching. I would be more concerned about the idiots who are on the phone,texting,eating or applying makeup. I dont see how tinted side markers could be the only cause of someone getting into an accident. That being said if you "play you must pay" if you use blackout kits on your tail lights and side makers you must accept the fact that you could be cited based on your states traffic laws.
With all do respect that's reaching. I would be more concerned about the idiots who are on the phone,texting,eating or applying makeup. I dont see how tinted side markers could be the only cause of someone getting into an accident. That being said if you "play you must pay" if you use blackout kits on your tail lights and side makers you must accept the fact that you could be cited based on your states traffic laws.
Oh,I agree 100% that it's reaching.....but have you ever known a lawyer who didn't bring up anything & everything to exonerate their client?
And it doesn't have to be the only cause to make it a no fault charge,only that it contributed,no matter how slight.
I just wanted to let the OP what he may be opening himself up to by painting his lights. It's his car & he can do with it as he pleases.
Iv been reading myself and from what I understand you have a much better chance of getting a ticket from smoked taillights, aftermarket hids, or clear corners(taking the amber out of the headlight). As long as you have white headlights, amber front blinkers, red tail lights, and red rear blinkers you have nothing to worry about.
I really don't see why everyone is making this big of a deal out of this. Every time someone post pics of their blacked out z06 you all say how sick it looks not how dangerous it is.
Btw if our side markers were blinkers I would agree with you that it is a bad idea.
I think the difference is even with a "blacked out" rear end...when you push the brake pedal the brake lights still light up red. You were pretty clear you wanted to paint the side markers, and thereby knowingly taking away the light/reflective capability of the markers, which is their intended purpose on the vehicle.
As someone said, go right ahead, but don't complain if you get caught and are issued a citation.
The side markers also act as safety reflectors and are there for a reason. Painting them to make your car look better (your opinion) is infantile and shows a gross lack of respect for everyone else on the highway.
I can't believe how stupid some people are
You can't be serious.
Anyways, the Geiger kit completely deletes the side markers...
I like the "side marker delete" look. Since my car's black, I just blacked them out to match. I think even if you painted yours, the light would still show through a little. You could always buy the black side marker covers and paint them. Then, you could remove them with ease if you change your mind.
Dave Lander sites "An Evaluation of Side Marker Lamps for Cars, Trucks and Buses" that concludes, although they have not been effective in reducing fatalaties, their adoption reduced the number of nighttime angle collisions by 16%. I think it reasonable to speculate that clear side markers with yellow bulbs and brilliant white reflectors rather than the hideous amber or red reflectors currently used would be equally effective in reducing accidents without being anywhere near as ugly. Painting over the side markers, however, clearly reduces their effectiveness in helping prevent accidents. One might also reasonably speculate that driving a dark grey or black vehicle at night is significantly more dangerous than driving a lighter colored vehicle.
I really don't see why everyone is making this big of a deal out of this. Every time someone post pics of their blacked out z06 you all say how sick it looks not how dangerous it is.
Yes, and thats the real issue.
People don't say anything because everybody here wants to play NiceNice and not tell anyone they did something fairly stupid like destroy things that are there to protect them, and more importantly, others. In some cases smoked lenses do look better, but that is also not the point. That also applies to people who put in 4 gazillion candlepower lights and blind anyone they meet because they think they look "kool".
You might also get a clue from your statement that "everyone is making this big of a deal". If nobody cared, or agreed with you, it wouldn't be a big deal. Notwithstanding remarks from Curly, Larry and Moe in some of the earlier posts.
Dave Lander sites "An Evaluation of Side Marker Lamps for Cars, Trucks and Buses" that concludes, although they have not been effective in reducing fatalaties, their adoption reduced the number of nighttime angle collisions by 16%. I think it reasonable to speculate that clear side markers with yellow bulbs and brilliant white reflectors rather than the hideous amber or red reflectors currently used would be equally effective in reducing accidents without being anywhere near as ugly. Painting over the side markers, however, clearly reduces their effectiveness in helping prevent accidents. One might also reasonably speculate that driving a dark grey or black vehicle at night is significantly more dangerous than driving a lighter colored vehicle.
Of course, one can speculate as much as one would like...but I presented a study that supported side markers as being effective in their current configuration. I'm interested to find out if you have a similar study showing the effectiveness of the markings you find superior?
Also...while you quote only the fatality conclusion, you left off the other, equally important conclusion:
Side marker lamps reduce the number of personal injuries in nighttime angle collisions by 21 percent. The reduction is statistically significant (confidence bounds: 12 to 29 percent).
Sorry...but I'm always suspicious when someone arguing a singular point ignores other, valid, ones.
People don't say anything because everybody here wants to play NiceNice and not tell anyone they did something fairly stupid like destroy things that are there to protect them, and more importantly, others. In some cases smoked lenses do look better, but that is also not the point. That also applies to people who put in 4 gazillion candlepower lights and blind anyone they meet because they think they look "kool".
You might also get a clue from your statement that "everyone is making this big of a deal". If nobody cared, or agreed with you, it wouldn't be a big deal. Notwithstanding remarks from Curly, Larry and Moe in some of the earlier posts.
You are a pathetic little man. Not to mention a colossal idiot.